40 Participants Needed

AMIC Surgery for Hip Cartilage Injury

(REPAIR Trial)

NS
Overseen ByNicole Simunovic, MSc
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 2 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This is a pilot multi-centre RCT of 40 patients (ages 18-55 years, inclusive) undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with a focal articular cartilage defect of the acetabulum to compare the effect of using autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) in comparison to microfracture on hip function, health-related quality of life, hip pain, cartilage regeneration, health utility, and any adverse events at 2 years. Follow-up will occur at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months post-surgery.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but it excludes those using immunosuppressive or anti-proliferative medications. It's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial team.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) for hip cartilage injury?

Research shows that AMIC is effective for treating cartilage defects in the knee, with good clinical results maintained over several years. This suggests it may also be beneficial for similar cartilage issues in the hip.12345

Is AMIC surgery generally safe for treating cartilage defects?

AMIC surgery, which combines microfracture surgery with a collagen membrane, has been studied for knee cartilage defects and shows good clinical results over several years, suggesting it is generally safe for humans.13567

How is the AMIC treatment for hip cartilage injury different from other treatments?

AMIC is unique because it combines microfracture, a technique that creates small holes in the bone to stimulate healing, with a collagen scaffold that helps stabilize the area and support new cartilage growth. This one-step approach is different from other treatments that may require multiple procedures or do not use a scaffold to aid in cartilage repair.12357

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for men and women aged 18-40 with hip pain from a specific type of cartilage damage in the hip socket, confirmed by MRI and surgery. They must have struggled with this pain for at least six months without relief from non-surgical treatments. Participants need to be able to follow the post-op rehab plan, understand the local language, give informed consent, and not have any conditions that exclude them like previous hip surgeries or certain medical issues.

Inclusion Criteria

I have had hip pain for over 6 months without relief from non-surgical treatments.
My MRI shows full thickness cartilage defects in my hip joint.
I agree to follow the study's rehab plan after surgery.
See 4 more

Exclusion Criteria

I suffer from long-term pain.
I have cartilage damage in my hip joint.
Any other reason(s) the investigator feels is relevant for excluding the patient
See 16 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo primary hip arthroscopy with either autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) or microfracture for focal articular cartilage damage

Surgery and immediate recovery

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for hip function, quality of life, hip pain, cartilage regeneration, and adverse events

24 months
Visits at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months post-surgery

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC)
Trial OverviewThe study compares two surgical techniques for repairing damaged hip cartilage: autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) versus microfracture. It aims to assess which method better improves hip function, quality of life, pain reduction, and cartilage regeneration over two years with check-ups every few months.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC)Experimental Treatment1 Intervention
Those allocated to the AMIC treatment group will also receive microfracture. Once the walls of the debrided lesion are confirmed to be stable with a probe, the exact size of the defect will be measured for templating of the scaffold. The dry Chondro-Gide® matrix will be prepared by cutting it to 10% smaller than the focal defect (as it increases in size about 10% after moistening). Once the cartilage lesion is dried manually, the implant will then be secured to the defect in a press-fit fashion to the surrounding cartilage. Manual pressure is then applied to secure the implant into the defect and the hip is released from traction and rotated to facilitate further fixation of the graft. Traction is then applied to arthroscopically confirm position and fixation of the implant.
Group II: MicrofractureActive Control1 Intervention
As per current standard of care for focal articular cartilage lesions of the acetabulum, the unstable cartilage will be debrided and removed from the subchondral bone using a mechanical shaver until a stable margin is obtained. A ring curette will be used to remove the calcified cartilage layer and create a border of healthy cartilage tissue that can support the marrow clot. Through the mid-anterior portal, specialized 90˚ awls will then be placed with the tip perpendicular to the subchondral bone of the acetabulum, and a mallet will be used to penetrate the subchondral bone with perforations 3 mm deep to access the bone marrow elements. This is done until the defect is homogeneously covered with micro-perforations 2-3 mm apart.

Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) is already approved in European Union, United States for the following indications:

🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as AMIC for:
  • Focal articular cartilage defects of the hip
  • Chondral lesions on the acetabulum or femoral head
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as AMIC for:
  • Cartilage repair in the hip
  • Chondral defects in the acetabulum or femoral head

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

McMaster University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
936
Recruited
2,630,000+

Geistlich Pharma AG

Industry Sponsor

Trials
45
Recruited
2,300+

Findings from Research

The AMIC technique for treating full-thickness knee cartilage defects larger than 2 cm² resulted in significant long-term improvements in knee function, with IKDC scores increasing from 31.7 to 80.6 points and Lysholm scores from 38.8 to 72.6 points over a median follow-up of 7 years.
A majority of patients (76.2%) reported satisfaction with their outcomes, and 66.6% showed good quality repair tissue on MRI, indicating that the positive effects of the treatment were maintained over time.
Good clinical results with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (Amic) technique in large knee chondral defects.Schiavone Panni, A., Del Regno, C., Mazzitelli, G., et al.[2018]
The Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) technique showed significant improvement in knee function and pain reduction over a 2-year follow-up period in 57 patients with full-thickness cartilage defects, with Lysholm scores increasing from an average of 50.1 preoperatively to 85.2 at 2 years post-surgery.
Patients reported a substantial decrease in pain levels, with VAS scores dropping from 7.0 before surgery to 2.0 two years after the procedure, indicating that AMIC is both effective and safe for treating symptomatic chondral defects.
Outcome of Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) in cartilage knee surgery: data of the AMIC Registry.Gille, J., Behrens, P., Volpi, P., et al.[2022]
In a randomized controlled trial involving 41 patients, both autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI-C) showed significant improvement in knee function scores after 2 years, with no significant differences between the two methods.
However, two patients in the AMIC group required total knee replacement by the 2-year follow-up, while none in the ACI-C group did, suggesting a potential safety concern with AMIC that warrants further investigation.
Collagen-Covered Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Repair of Cartilage Defects of the Knee.Fossum, V., Hansen, AK., Wilsgaard, T., et al.[2022]

References

Good clinical results with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (Amic) technique in large knee chondral defects. [2018]
Outcome of Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) in cartilage knee surgery: data of the AMIC Registry. [2022]
Collagen-Covered Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Repair of Cartilage Defects of the Knee. [2022]
Treatment of isolated chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee by autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC). [2022]
Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects in the Knee: A Follow-up Study. [2022]
Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) for Focal Chondral Lesions of the Knee: A 2-Year Follow-Up of Clinical, Proprioceptive, and Isokinetic Evaluation. [2022]
Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Knee: A Review. [2022]