231 Participants Needed

NOA VOLUME Gel for Midface Volume Loss

Recruiting at 3 trial locations
AC
Overseen ByABBVIE CALL CENTER
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 3
Sponsor: AbbVie
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial
Approved in 1 JurisdictionThis treatment is already approved in other countries

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests a new treatment called NOA VOLUME, a gel designed to restore fullness in the mid-face and bring back a youthful look. The study compares NOA VOLUME with another treatment, VOLUMA XC, to determine which is safer and more effective. Participants will receive injections and may undergo touch-up treatments over time. This trial suits adults with noticeable facial volume loss who believe treatment could improve their facial fullness. Those with significant skin issues or facial infections might not qualify for the study. As a Phase 3 trial, it represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants a chance to contribute to the potential availability of a new treatment.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. Please consult with the trial coordinators for more details.

What prior data suggests that this gel implant is safe for mid-face volume improvement?

In previous studies, NOA VOLUME, a gel made from hyaluronic acid (a substance naturally found in the body), has proven to be safe and easy to use for improving mid-face volume. This gel also contains lidocaine to reduce pain during treatment. Research shows that hyaluronic acid fillers are generally well-tolerated, with side effects usually mild and temporary, such as swelling or bruising at the injection site.

JUVÉDERM VOLUMA XC, the treatment compared in this trial, is an FDA-approved product for enhancing cheeks. It has a proven safety record with similar mild side effects, like redness or tenderness, which also tend to be short-lived.

Both treatments have been used in other situations, supporting their general safety. However, this trial specifically studies NOA VOLUME for mid-face volume loss, so ongoing research will provide more specific safety information.12345

Why do researchers think this study treatment might be promising for midface volume loss?

Researchers are excited about NOA VOLUME for midface volume loss because it offers a new approach to facial rejuvenation. Unlike traditional fillers like VOLUMA XC, which primarily use hyaluronic acid, NOA VOLUME may incorporate unique components or a different formulation that provides more natural or longer-lasting results. This innovative treatment could potentially enhance facial volume with fewer sessions and maintain the desired look for an extended period, offering patients a more convenient and effective solution.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for mid-face volume loss?

Research shows that gels made from hyaluronic acid, such as NOA VOLUME, can effectively restore facial volume. Previous studies have demonstrated that similar treatments significantly improve the fullness of the mid-face area. Specifically, one study found that participants experienced an average increase in facial volume of about 4.46 mL just 45 days after treatment. This trial will compare NOA VOLUME with VOLUMA XC, both designed to enhance mid-face volume and provide a more youthful look. These treatments are designed to be safe and involve minimal procedures, making them attractive choices for those seeking to refresh their facial appearance.12346

Who Is on the Research Team?

AI

ABBVIE INC.

Principal Investigator

AbbVie

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults with moderate to severe mid-face volume loss who could benefit from facial filler injections. Participants must have a certain level of volume deficit that can be improved by the treatment, as judged by the investigator.

Inclusion Criteria

My mid-face area has a noticeable volume loss.
My mid-face can improve with treatment, as per my doctor's judgment.

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive NOA VOLUME or VOLUMA XC injections in the cheek on Day 1, with optional touch-up treatment on Day 31

1 month
2 visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, with optional repeat treatments at Month 12, 15, or 18

Up to 22 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • NOA VOLUME
Trial Overview The study compares NOA VOLUME, a new Hyaluronic Acid gel implant with lidocaine, against JUVÉDERM VOLUMA XC for increasing mid-face volume. Patients will receive treatments via cheek injections and may get touch-ups or repeat treatments over up to 22 months.
How Is the Trial Designed?
4Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Cohort 2: VOLUMA XCExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Cohort 2: NOA VOLUMEExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group III: Cohort 1: VOLUMA XCExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group IV: Cohort 1: NOA VOLUMEExperimental Treatment1 Intervention

NOA VOLUME is already approved in United States for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as NOA VOLUME Injectable Gel for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

AbbVie

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,079
Recruited
535,000+
Founded
2013
Headquarters
North Chicago, USA
Known For
Immunology treatments
Top Products
Humira (adalimumab), Skyrizi (risankizumab), Rinvoq (upadacitinib)

Dr. Roopal Thakkar

AbbVie

Chief Medical Officer since 2023

MD from Wayne State University School of Medicine

Robert A. Michael profile image

Robert A. Michael

AbbVie

Chief Executive Officer

Bachelor's degree in Finance from the University of Illinois

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a 6-month study involving 60 adults aged 40-65, hyaluronic acid gel significantly improved facial volume loss and contour deficiency, as measured by the Facial Volume Loss Scale (FVLS) and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).
While 100% of participants showed improvement at 3 months, 91% maintained improvement at 6 months, indicating that hyaluronic acid gel is both effective and safe for treating volume loss in the face.
Evaluation of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler for volume restoration.Alessandrini, A., Fino, P., Giordan, N., et al.[2015]
In a six-month study involving multiple centers, HA E Volume injections significantly improved cheek volume in patients with age-related volume loss, with 89.3% of subjects reporting aesthetic improvement at three weeks post-injection.
The treatment demonstrated good safety and tolerability, with 92.1% of participants expressing satisfaction with their results, and 65.8% of the initial volume correction maintained after six months.
Sustained efficacy and high patient satisfaction after cheek enhancement with a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler.Kestemont, P., Cartier, H., Trevidic, P., et al.[2015]
In a study involving 60 subjects, the use of large gel particle hyaluronic acid with lidocaine injected via blunt-tip microcannulas showed a favorable safety profile, with only one mild adverse event reported and no serious complications.
The treatment was highly effective for cheek augmentation and correcting midface volume loss, with over 98% of subjects reporting aesthetic improvements and a 100% responder rate on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale at 8 weeks.
Microcannula Injection of Large Gel Particle Hyaluronic Acid for Cheek Augmentation and the Correction of Age-Related Midface Contour Deficiencies.Jones, DH., Hessler, J., Chapas, A., et al.[2021]

Citations

NCT06734351 | A Study to Assess Safety and ...A Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Injections of NOA VOLUME Injectable Gel in Adult Participants Compared to JUVÉDERM VOLUMA XC for Change of Mid- ...
A Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Injections ...A Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Injections of NOA VOLUME Injectable Gel in Adult Participants Compared to JUVÉDERM VOLUMA XC for Change of Mid- ...
NOA VOLUME Gel for Midface Volume LossResearch shows that hyaluronic acid-based gels, like NOA VOLUME, are effective in restoring facial volume. Studies on similar treatments have demonstrated ...
A Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Injections of ...The purpose of this study is to assess safety and effectiveness of NOA VOLUME in adult participants seeking improvement of mid-face volume compared to JUVÉDERM ...
Volume Restoration in Mid-Facial AgingResults: In total, 39 out of 47 patients completed the study, which showed an overall volume restoration of 4.46 ± 1.34 mL at 45 days (t0–t1) after HA ...
Safety and Effectiveness of Juvéderm® VOLUMA XC ...A Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Injections of NOA VOLUME Injectable Gel in Adult Participants Compared to JUVÉDERM VOLUMA XC for Change of Mid- ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security