Bias Mitigation Training for End-of-Life Care

(BRiDgE-Sim Trial)

No longer recruiting at 1 trial location
EC
Overseen ByElizabeth Chuang, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Montefiore Medical Center
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial explores how doctors communicate with families of seriously ill patients, with a focus on reducing racial bias. Researchers are testing two types of training: one combines communication skills with bias reduction (Communication and Bias Mitigation Training), and the other focuses solely on communication skills. The goal is to determine if adding bias reduction helps doctors communicate better with Black family members. This trial suits physicians who work with seriously ill patients in hospitals and specialize in areas like oncology or critical care. As an unphased study, it offers a unique opportunity to improve communication and reduce bias in healthcare settings.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether participants need to stop taking their current medications.

What prior data suggests that this training intervention is safe for improving communication in end-of-life care?

Research has shown that training can help doctors communicate better with patients and their families at the end of life. This training teaches doctors to listen carefully and share important information clearly. It also helps them understand and respect the wishes of patients and families.

Studies have found that this training makes discussions about end-of-life care easier and more effective, reducing stress for both patients and doctors. Regarding safety, these training sessions have not shown any negative effects. They primarily involve role-playing and discussions, which are generally safe.

Bias mitigation training helps doctors recognize and reduce hidden biases. This training has been successfully adapted from programs used with medical students. Although specific safety data for this training is lacking, the methods used—such as discussions and exercises—are similar to other safe training programs.

Overall, both types of training aim to improve communication and understanding, and they appear safe based on past research.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about this trial because it aims to enhance end-of-life care by addressing biases that may affect patient interactions. Unlike standard communication training, which focuses on general palliative care techniques, the experimental training incorporates bias mitigation strategies adapted for clinicians. This includes transformational learning methods like critical reflection and perspective-taking exercises, which are designed to tackle racial bias and improve communication with diverse patient groups. By potentially improving clinician-patient interactions, this approach could lead to more personalized and equitable care in end-of-life situations.

What evidence suggests that this trial's training interventions could be effective for improving communication in end-of-life care?

Research has shown that training programs for end-of-life care, including activities like role-playing and reflection, can enhance healthcare professionals' communication skills. For example, one study found that oncologists who received communication training were more effective at discussing end-of-life issues with patients. Another study demonstrated that such training improved doctors' ability to deliver bad news to patients and their families. In this trial, participants will join one of two groups: one group will receive Communication and Bias Mitigation Training, which includes strategies to reduce bias and improve communication with Black patients and their families, while the other group will receive Communication Training Only, focusing on standard palliative care techniques. Although direct evidence of the combined training's effectiveness is limited, the individual components have shown positive results in similar situations.16789

Who Is on the Research Team?

EC

Elizabeth Chuang, MD

Principal Investigator

Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for physicians specializing in oncology, critical care, hospitalist medicine, emergency medicine or geriatrics who frequently care for seriously ill patients. It's not open to those trained in Hospice and Palliative Medicine or doctors who spend less than 10% of their time with critically ill hospitalized patients.

Inclusion Criteria

Practicing physicians specializing in oncology, critical care, hospitalist medicine, emergency medicine, or geriatrics

Exclusion Criteria

Physicians who do not care for seriously ill patients in the hospital at least 10% of their working time
Physicians trained in Hospice and Palliative Medicine

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Phase 1: Simulated Clinical Encounter

Physicians participate in a simulated clinical encounter with a standardized caregiver to assess communication behaviors and implicit bias.

1 day
1 visit (in-person)

Phase 2: Communication Training

Randomized training session to mitigate implicit bias and improve communication skills, including a VR experience and role-play exercises.

1 half-day workshop
1 visit (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in communication behavior and bias mitigation effectiveness post-training.

4 weeks

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Communication and Bias Mitigation Training
  • Communication skills training
Trial Overview The study tests a training program designed to improve how doctors communicate with families of critically ill patients by reducing racial biases. Doctors will be randomly assigned to either bias mitigation plus communication training or just communication training and then evaluated on their interactions.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Communication and Bias Mitigation TrainingExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Communication Training OnlyActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Montefiore Medical Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
468
Recruited
599,000+

University of Nebraska Lincoln

Collaborator

Trials
40
Recruited
13,200+

Tulane University School of Medicine

Collaborator

Trials
35
Recruited
117,000+

Dartmouth College

Collaborator

Trials
93
Recruited
1,415,000+

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)

Collaborator

Trials
473
Recruited
1,374,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

A systematic review of 10 studies found that communication-skills training for noncancer acute-based healthcare staff positively impacts their behavior when discussing end-of-life care with patients and families, enhancing confidence and self-efficacy.
Despite the positive outcomes, the studies varied in quality and design, indicating a need for more rigorous research, such as randomized controlled trials, to better assess the effectiveness of these training interventions.
The effectiveness of communication-skills training interventions in end-of-life noncancer care in acute hospital-based services: A systematic review.Lord, L., Clark-Carter, D., Grove, A.[2018]
There is a significant gap between patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the handling of medical errors, as well as between existing disclosure policies and their actual implementation in practice, highlighting the need for improved communication and transparency in healthcare.
Barriers to full disclosure of adverse events include fear of consequences, lack of skills, and insufficient institutional support, which not only affect patient safety but also traumatize healthcare workers, known as the 'second victim' phenomenon. A comprehensive approach involving multiple levels of the healthcare system is necessary to address these issues.
Disclosure of adverse events in the United States and Canada: an update, and a proposed framework for improvement.Wu, AW., Boyle, DJ., Wallace, G., et al.[2021]
Online communication skills training (CST) significantly improved health professionals' self-assessed communication skills, confidence, and objective knowledge, based on a review of 19 studies involving 1116 health professionals and patients.
While the training showed promise in enhancing communication skills in oncology settings, the direct impact on patient outcomes remains unclear and requires further research to establish effectiveness.
Effectiveness of online communication skills training for cancer and palliative care health professionals: A systematic review.Berg, MN., Ngune, I., Schofield, P., et al.[2021]

Citations

1.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28782701/
A Systematic Review of End-of-Life Care Communication ...This review found that end-of-life care training often uses didactics, reflection, and role play, but has weak evaluation designs and poor reporting.
Effects of a communication training for oncologists on early ...Findings indicate that the compact communication skills training PALLI-COM increases oncologists' competencies in early addressing PC/EoL-related issues from ...
Efficacy of Communication Skills Training for Giving Bad ...The primary outcomes were observable participant communication skills measured during standardized patient encounters before and after the workshop in giving ...
Communication tools for end-of-life decision-making in the ...For this paper, which focuses on the ICU setting, our primary outcomes were: (1) proportion of patients with documented goals of care ...
Navigating end-of-life decision-making in nursing: a ...This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the ethical dilemma's nurses encounter in end-of-life care and effective palliative care practices.
Improving Communication by Preparing Patients and Doctors ...For patients with serious illness, communication about goals of care is associated with improved patient outcomes and reduced intensity of end-of-life care, ...
Improving serious illness communication: a qualitative study of ...We studied the clinical culture-related factors that supported or impeded improvement in serious illness conversations.
Managing Bias in Palliative Care: Professional Hazards in ...This is the first study identifying palliative care clinicians' biases and bias management strategies in end-of-life goals of care discussions.
Improving training in end of life care communication among ...A workplace based training intervention for junior doctors to improve their skills and confidence in undertaking EoLC conversations.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security