Learn More About Power

Why We Started Power

We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

Bask
Bask GillCEO at Power
Learn More About Trials
How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
1045 Sansome St, Suite 321, San Francisco, CA
hello@withpower.com(415) 900-4227
About UsClinical Trials by ConditionAll Clinical TrialsWork With Us
1
Directories
Conditions
Cities
States
Popular Categories
Depression & Anxiety
Neurology
Psychiatry
Pain
Metabolism
Treatments
Locations
Florida
New Jersey
North Carolina
Texas
Ohio
California
Pennsylvania
Kentucky
New York
Indiana
Psychology Related
Depression
Schizophrenia
Anxiety
PTSD
ADHD
Autism
Bipolar Disorder
Addiction
OCD
Eating Disorder
Treatments
Psilocybin
IVF
Dental Implant
Weight Loss
Smoking
Platelet-Rich Plasma
Testosterone
Saxenda
Melatonin
Entresto
Cities
Saint Louis
Columbus
Portland
Ann Arbor
Aurora
Salt Lake City
Rochester
Birmingham
Detroit
New Haven
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies
Cookies & Data Use Policy

At Power, we believe in using data responsibly to help you find the right clinical trials — without compromising your privacy. This page explains how we use cookies and personal data across www.withpower.com.

Before You Create a Profile

When you browse Power's website, you're opting in to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to improve your experience and help us understand how the site is used so that we can make improvements for you in the future. Specifically, we use cookies to:

Personalize Your Experience

We use cookies to customize your visit based on basic information like your general location (determined by your IP address). This allows us to:

  • Show you clinical trials that are geographically relevant to you
  • Tailor search results to match the conditions or keywords you've explored before
  • Pre-fill certain fields or remember your previous searches, so you don't have to repeat them

Save Your Preferences

We remember what you interact with during your visit — for example:

  • The conditions you search for
  • Whether you prefer certain types of studies (e.g., paid trials, trials for a specific age group)
  • Your sorting or filtering preferences when browsing trials

This helps us make your experience more efficient and personalized the next time you visit.

Understand How the Site Is Used

Cookies help us collect anonymous usage data so we can make Power better. We use these insights to:

  • Monitor how users move through the site — for example, which pages get the most traffic and where users tend to exit
  • Track how long visitors stay on each page and whether they find what they’re looking for
  • Identify points of friction or confusion so we can improve usability
  • Test design changes (like different page layouts or buttons) and measure which version performs better
  • Detect and fix bugs or slow-loading pages to maintain site reliability

These analytics are aggregated and do not include personal identifiers. We use tools like Google Analytics to process this data, but we don't use it to target ads or sell your information.

We do not:

  • Sell or share your personal data with advertisers
  • Use your behavior on our site to target you with third-party ads

All cookie use is designed to support your experience on Power — never to track you across the internet or monetize your information.

After You Create a Profile

When you sign up for a Power account, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service. Creating a profile allows us to better serve you by tailoring the platform to your specific needs.

Once you create a profile:

  • We may collect additional information about your health and clinical interests to help us match you to the most relevant studies.
  • We continue to use cookies to remember your session, keep you logged in, and personalize your dashboard.
  • You have full control — you can delete your profile at any time, and we'll remove your personal data in accordance with our privacy practices.

We use your data solely to fulfill our mission: helping you find clinical trials that could be a fit — not for advertising or resale.

·Security
Condition
Suggested Conditions
  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Alzheimer's Disease
  • Weight Loss
  • Heart Disease
  • Cancer
  • Asthma
Location

    Implementation

    Current Location

    Search
    Implementation
    Show Map
    Map View
    Your Location

    Popular Searches

    By Condition

    Depression Clinical Trials

    Anxiety Clinical Trials

    Schizophrenia Clinical Trials

    ADHD Clinical Trials

    Bipolar Disorder Clinical Trials

    Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials

    Autism Clinical Trials

    Treatment Resistant Depression Clinical Trials

    Borderline Personality Disorder Clinical Trials

    Social Anxiety Disorder Clinical Trials

    Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials

    Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials

    By Location

    Clinical Trials in California

    Clinical Trials in Florida

    Clinical Trials in Texas

    Clinical Trials in New York

    Clinical Trials in Ohio

    Clinical Trials in Illinois

    Clinical Trials in Pennsylvania

    Clinical Trials in Michigan

    Clinical Trials in North Carolina

    Clinical Trials in Massachusetts

    Clinical Trials in Missouri

    Clinical Trials in Minnesota

    Other People Viewed

    By Subject

    Top Clinical Trials near Kearney, NE

    Top Clinical Trials near Connecticut

    Top Clinical Trials near Cypress, CA

    Top Atherosclerosis Clinical Trials

    Top Clinical Trials near Omaha, NE

    Top Fallopian Tube Cancer Clinical Trials

    Top Clinical Trials near Crossville, TN

    11 Leiomyosarcoma Trials near Glendale, AZ

    218 Clinical Trials near Bryan, TX

    26 Leiomyosarcoma Trials near Boston, MA

    170 Clinical Paid Trials near Long Beach, CA

    Top Clinical Trials near Indiana

    By Trial

    MRI Screening for Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer

    Trans-Amniotic Suture Placement for TTTS

    Gemcitabine + Vitamin C + Radiation for Pancreatic Cancer

    Geriatric Assessment for Cancer

    CGM Use for Diabetes

    ARC Intervention for HIV/AIDS

    Guselkumab for Crohn's Disease

    Family-Based Weight Loss Program for Childhood Obesity

    Ibrutinib + Fludarabine for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

    Tailored Therapy for Endometrial Cancer

    Proton Therapy for Recurrent Cancer

    Search Clinical Trials
    Conditions
    Suggestions
    • Anxiety
    • Depression
    • Alzheimer's Disease
    • Weight Loss
    • Heart Disease
    • Cancer
    • Asthma
    Locations
    Suggestions
      Treatment Type
      Suggestions
      • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
      • Medication Management
      • Group Therapy
      • Psychotherapy
      • Mindfulness-Based Therapy
      • Exposure Therapy

      Trial Phase

      Trial Status

      Paid Participation

      Filters

      0

      Suggestions
      • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
      • Medication Management
      • Group Therapy
      • Psychotherapy
      • Mindfulness-Based Therapy
      • Exposure Therapy

      Paid Participation

      Trial Status

      Trial Phase

      Clear All
      Why We Started Power

      We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

      Bask
      Bask GillCEO at Power
      Learn More About Trials
      How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?

      106 Implementation Trials Near You

      Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Implementation patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.

      Learn More About Power
      No Placebo
      Highly Paid
      Stay on Current Meds
      Pivotal Trials (Near Approval)
      Breakthrough Medication

      Preschool and Me for Developmental Delay

      Chicago, Illinois
      This proposal aims to test whether a proposed community-clinical linkage (CCL), an educational-medical linkage model, improves access to school-based services and subsequent child, parent, family and health service outcomes and offers a promising strategy to address longstanding racial, ethnic and income health care disparities among families with preschool children with developmental delays and disabilities. The investigators designed an educational-clinical linkage model, Preschool and Me (PreM) which incorporates key components of a CCL. It also utilizes a personalized medical-education care plan with remote lay navigator support to increase access to school-based services.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Age:36+

      320 Participants Needed

      Measurement-Based Care for Opioid Use Disorder

      Chicago, Illinois
      The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of measurement-based care, which involves the systematic use of client self-report data to inform and enhance treatment, in opioid treatment programs using a pilot hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design. The main questions this study aims to answer are: 1) is measurement based care effective for improving patient treatment attendance and opioid abstinence, and 2) can measurement based care be implemented with fidelity in opioid treatment programs? Participants in this study will be opioid treatment program leaders and treatment providers. Leaders and treatment providers will participate in measurement-based care implementation strategies such as training and consultation to help them use measurement-based care with their patients. There is no comparison group for this study, however researchers will compare effectiveness outcomes prior to and post measurement-based care implementation and will evaluate changes in measurement-based care use with fidelity post implementation.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Non-English Speakers, Under 18, Others

      40 Participants Needed

      Mi Quit Care for Quitting Smoking

      Chicago, Illinois
      The over-arching research question is: Does message (Advise) and referral approach (Refer) influence a patient's willingness to "opt-in" to receive a call from an Illinois Tobacco Quitline (ITQL) smoking cessation coach in patients at MSHC. Primary UH3 study aim: Compare the effect of the portal-delivered Choice message (Arm 1) to the Information-only message (Arm 3) on linkage to the Illinois Tobacco Quitline (i.e., spoke to a Quitline coach). Secondary UH3 aims are to: Examine the reach of the patient portal for delivering "Advise" and "Refer" at 4 weeks. Reach is defined as a patient opening the portal-delivered provider message across all three Arms. Compare the effect of the Quit message (Quit, Arm 2) to Information-only (Arm 3) on linkage to ITQL. Compare the effect of the Facilitated-referral messages (opt-in link in the message: Arm 1 \& 2) vs. Self-referral (Information-only, Arm 3) on linkage to the ITQL (speaking to an ITQL coach) at four weeks. Compare the effect of the portal-message content of the Choice message (Arm 1) vs. the Quit message (Arm 2) on linkage acceptance (opting in to be called by the ITQL) at 4 weeks. Compare the effectiveness of re-engagement message 1 to message 2 for linkage to the ITQL among patients who opted-in to an ITQL call but who were not reached after 3 attempts. Evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using a patient portal to advise patients to change their smoking behavior and refer them to the ITQL. We will compare the costs associated with our project to the costs associated with advising and referring patients during clinical appointments.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Under 18, Non-smoker, Others

      3000 Participants Needed

      Genetic Counseling Chatbot for Kidney Donors

      Chicago, Illinois
      Living donor (LD) kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, LDs take on a higher risk of future ESKD themselves. African American (AA) LDs have an even greater, 3.3-fold, risk of ESKD than white LDs post-donation. Because evidence suggests that Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) risk variants contribute to this greater risk, transplant nephrologists are increasingly using APOL1 testing to evaluate LD candidates of African ancestry. However, nephrologists do not consistently perform genetic counseling with LD candidates about APOL1 due to a lack of knowledge and skill in counseling about APOL1. Without proper counseling, APOL1 testing will magnify LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, jeopardizing their informed consent. Given their elevated risk of ESRD post-donation, and AAs' widely-held cultural concerns about genetic testing, it is ethically critical to protect AA LD candidates' safety through APOL1 testing in a culturally competent manner to improve informed decisions about donating. No transplant programs have integrated APOL1 testing into LD evaluation in a culturally competent manner. Clinical "chatbots," mobile apps that use artificial intelligence to provide genetic information to patients and relieve constraints on clinicians' time, can improve informed treatment decisions and reduce decisional conflict. The chatbot "Gia," created by a medical genetics company, can be adapted to any condition. However, no chatbot on APOL1is currently available. No counseling training programs are available for nephrologists to counsel AA LDs about APOL1 and donation in a culturally competent manner. Given the shortage of genetic counselors, increasing nephrologists' genetic literacy is critical to integrating genetic testing into practice. The objective of this study is to culturally adapt and evaluate the effectiveness of an APOL1testing program for AA LDs at two transplant centers serving large AA LD populations (Chicago, IL, and Washington, DC). The APOL1 testing program will evaluate the effect of the culturally competent testing, chatbot, and counseling on AA LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, preparedness for decision-making, willingness to donate, and satisfaction with informed consent. The specific aims are to: 1. Adapt Gia and transplant counseling to APOL1 for use in routine clinical practice 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention on decisional conflict, preparedness, and willingness to donate in a pre-post design 3. Evaluate the implementation of this intervention into clinical practice by using the RE-AIM framework to longitudinally evaluate nephrologist counseling practices and LDs' satisfaction with informed consent. The impact of this study will be the creation of a model for APOL1 testing of AA LDs, which can then be implemented nationally via implementation science approaches. APOL1 will serve as a model for integrating culturally competent genetic testing into transplant and other practices to improve patient informed consent.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Not Listed

      12 Participants Needed

      APOL1 Genetic Testing for Kidney Disease

      Chicago, Illinois
      Living donor (LD) kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, LDs take on a higher risk of future ESKD themselves. African American (AA) LDs have an even greater, 3.3-fold, risk of ESKD than white LDs post-donation. Because evidence suggests that Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) risk variants contribute to this greater risk, transplant nephrologists are increasingly using APOL1 testing to evaluate LD candidates of African ancestry. However, nephrologists do not consistently perform genetic counseling with LD candidates about APOL1 due to a lack of knowledge and skill in counseling about APOL1. Without proper counseling, APOL1 testing will magnify LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, jeopardizing their informed consent. Given their elevated risk of ESRD post-donation, and AAs' widely-held cultural concerns about genetic testing, it is ethically critical to protect AA LD candidates' safety through APOL1 testing in a culturally competent manner to improve informed decisions about donating. No transplant programs have integrated APOL1 testing into LD evaluation in a culturally competent manner. Clinical "chatbots," mobile apps that use artificial intelligence to provide genetic information to patients and relieve constraints on clinicians' time, can improve informed treatment decisions and reduce decisional conflict. The chatbot "Gia," created by a medical genetics company, can be adapted to any condition. However, no chatbot on APOL1 is currently available. No counseling training programs are available for nephrologists to counsel AA LDs about APOL1 and donation in a culturally competent manner. Given the shortage of genetic counselors, increasing nephrologists' genetic literacy is critical to integrating genetic testing into practice. The objective of this study is to culturally adapt and evaluate the effectiveness of an APOL1 testing program for AA LDs at two transplant centers serving large AA LD populations (Chicago, IL, and Washington, DC). The APOL1 testing program will evaluate the effect of the culturally competent testing, chatbot, and counseling on AA LD candidates' decisional conflict about donating, preparedness for decision-making, willingness to donate, and satisfaction with informed consent. The specific aims are to: 1. Adapt Gia and transplant counseling to APOL1 for use in routine clinical practice 2. Evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention on decisional conflict, preparedness, and willingness to donate in a pre-post design 3. Evaluate the implementation of this intervention into clinical practice by using the RE-AIM framework to longitudinally evaluate nephrologist counseling practices and LDs' satisfaction with informed consent. The impact of this study will be the creation of a model for APOL1 testing of AA LDs, which can then be implemented nationally via implementation science approaches. APOL1 will serve as a model for integrating culturally competent genetic testing into transplant and other practices to improve patient informed consent.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Non-African Ancestry, Pregnancy, Others

      206 Participants Needed

      Mobile App for Firefighter Mental Health

      Hamilton
      The goal of this clinical trial is to test how best to implement a mobile peer support app called PeerOnCall in Canadian fire services. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Do firefighters use the app more with a structured implementation compared to standard implementation? 2. Does using the app improve mental health and workplace outcomes? Researchers will compare a standard implementation approach with basic onboarding to more structured implementation with weekly reminders, new content, and feedback reports to see if these features encourage more consistent app use. Participants will: 1. Use the PeerOnCall app to access private peer support and wellness resources. 2. Participate in surveys, interviews, and focus groups about their app experience and workplace environment.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Not Able To Access App

      2000 Participants Needed

      Take a Break + NRT for Smoking Cessation

      Winston-Salem, North Carolina
      The study team proposes a multi-level trial to test 1) novel implementation programs in rural counties designed to increase access to 2) recent advances in tobacco control services for people who are not-yet-ready-to-quit smoking. In this field, most trials have focused only on those already ready-to-quit. Thus, the proposed trial addresses an important knowledge gap critical to advance tobacco control in rural areas.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Actively Quitting, Prisoners, NRT Contraindications, Others

      800 Participants Needed

      GRACE-Augmented Wellness Visits for Aging

      Winston-Salem, North Carolina
      This study consists of three aims focused on examining the feasibility of adding the Geriatric Resources and Assessment for the Care of Elders (GRACE) model to structured Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) to improve patient and caregiver outcomes and reduce hospitalizations in older adults with complex health needs. The objectives are to: 1. Co-design a community-centric implementation strategy for the AWVs vs AWVs + GRACE -augmented care (AWV GRACE) study arms 2. Develop a referral pathway and algorithm to optimize enrollment of eligible participants 3. Conduct a pilot clinical trial to assess the feasibility of the AWV GRACE intervention.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Diabetes, Hypertension, Bipolar, Others

      6080 Participants Needed

      Mobile Health Support for Colorectal Cancer Screening

      Winston-Salem, North Carolina
      This study assesses the effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening intervention, mobile Patient Technology for Health (mPATH™-Cloud), compared to usual care among subjects who are overdue for CRC screening according to recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Taskforce (USPSTF). The trial randomly selects and enrolls 1,000 eligible subjects served by one federally qualified health center (FQHC) in North Carolina. Subjects are randomized to two study arms, Usual Care (Arm 1) or Mobile Health Decision Support (Arm 2). Usual care consists of a visit-based screening recommendation to complete a stool test (e.g., FOBT, FIT, Cologuard) or referral to a screening colonoscopy. Subjects randomized to the Mobile Health Decision Support (Arm 2) are sent a message by text or US mail, depending on their preferred communication mode as indicated in the electronic health record (EHR), to visit the mPATH™-Cloud website. Subjects who engage with mPATH™-Cloud are invited to answer brief questions to confirm their eligibility and then view a short decision aid video designed to help people choose the CRC screening test (FIT or colonoscopy) that they would like to receive. After watching the video, subjects can choose a CRC screening test. Their primary care provider at the FQHC orders the appropriate test and, where indicated, refers the subjects to a colonoscopy. Subjects who request FIT screening and subjects who do not select any test receive a FIT mailed to their home address. The primary outcome of interest is CRC screening completion within 6 months after randomization as assessed by EHR chart review. A completed screening is any of the following: colonoscopy completion (regardless of indication); 2) at least one FIT test with a normal result; or diagnostic colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT result. We hypothesize that we will observe a higher CRC screening completion rate in the Mobile Health Decision Support intervention arm (Arm 2). This study includes up to three annual rounds of screening eligibility assessment and outreach. Repeated intervention rounds allow us to evaluate whether the intervention can improve adherence to USPSTF recommendations over time. During the 3-year intervention phase, Arm 1 receives usual care only.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Age:45 - 73

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Age, CRC History, Inflammatory Bowel, Others

      1000 Participants Needed

      Fit Together Program for Childhood Obesity

      Winston-Salem, North Carolina
      The proposed project will test an implementation strategy (the "TrailGuide") for delivering an existing model of pediatric obesity treatment ("Fit Together") that has demonstrated ability to meet published recommendations for improving health outcomes of children with obesity.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Age:5 - 12

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Injuries, Disabilities, Others

      400 Participants Needed

      Functional Electrical Stimulation for Cerebral Palsy

      Toronto, Ontario
      Physical rehabilitation interventions that promote activity-dependent neuroplasticity are desired for children with CP as this will result in improved motor skill and function. In adult neurological populations, such as stroke and spinal cord injury, FES is a recommended, evidence-based intervention that addresses motor and sensory impairments and promotes neuroplasticity. The evidence base supporting the safety, feasibility and efficacy of FES for youth with CP is rapidly growing, yet FES is not commonly used in Canadian pediatric rehabilitation. Through interviews with Canadian pediatric physical and occupational therapists, we identified numerous barriers to FES implementation, including a lack of knowledge and training in FES, difficulty accessing FES equipment, and a perceived lack of time to deliver FES within a treatment session. To address these barriers, we have developed an implementation intervention for FES that consists of an online course and toolkit for physical and occupational therapists. As a next step, we will evaluate the effects of the implementation intervention on pediatric therapists' knowledge, confidence and use of FES.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Non-therapists, Non-Canadian, Others

      18 Participants Needed

      Telehealth for Sleep Apnea

      Bethesda, Maryland
      The long-term goal of this research is to improve military health and operational readiness among military service members with sleep disorders. The overall objective of the current study is to 1) determine the clinical effectiveness (non-inferiority) and cost-effectiveness of OSA telehealth care, including a human sleep navigator (vs private sector care), and 2) to perform a formative evaluation of the implementation of the OSA telehealth care intervention within the National Capitol Region (NCR) market. The central hypothesis is that OSA telehealth care including a human sleep navigator is clinically non-inferior to private sector care and also more cost-effective than private sector care. The investigators plan to achieve the objectives via these 3 Specific Aims: Specific Aim 1: To determine the clinical effectiveness (non-inferiority) of OSA telehealth care, relative to private sector care. Hypothesis 1a: Relative to private sector care, OSA telehealth care is non-inferior for achieving PAP adherence (primary endpoint). Hypothesis 1b: Relative to private sector care, OSA telehealth care is non-inferior for reducing OSA symptoms and for patient satisfaction (secondary endpoints). Specific Aim 2: To engage participants via qualitative focus groups and conduct a formative evaluation of the implementation of the OSA telehealth care intervention, using a standardized approach based on the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Specific Aim 3: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of OSA telehealth care from the DHA perspective. Hypothesis 3: Relative to private sector care, OSA telehealth care is more cost-effective.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Age:18 - 64

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Prior OSA Care, Substance Dependence, Others

      160 Participants Needed

      Brief Family Therapy for Child Mental Health

      Toronto, Ontario
      Background. Children are vulnerable to mental health challenges during development. Given that youth are reliant on their parents for support, understanding the child's symptoms within the family context is critical for promoting positive change. This proposal focuses on "systemic therapy", or family-based therapy, which seeks to enhance children's mental health by improving the relationships and communication between family members (1). Most family-based therapies for treating child mental health problems are intense in duration and frequency (2), which is a barrier to access for many families. Shorter-term family therapies or what will be referred to hereafter as brief family-based therapies are effective in treating a variety of child symptoms, while also minimizing participant burden and therapy dropout (3). One type of brief family-based therapy model is the Lausanne Family Play - Brief (LFP-B), a three-session service that utilizes a play-based family observational assessment with video feedback to draw attention to and catalyze change in challenging family interactions. The LFP has been widely researched as a clinical assessment tool and has been implemented as a brief family-based therapy program (4). The current project represents the implementation and evaluation of the program in the York University Psychology Clinic (YUPC), which services children, adults, couples, and families in the Greater Toronto Area (and Ontario, broadly). The current study will be the first to evaluate the implementation, acceptability, and effectiveness of the LFP-B as a clinic service. Objectives. The aim of this project is to evaluate the LFP-B as a brief family-based clinical service offered in the YUPC. The first objective is to explore program acceptability for both clients and therapists. The investigators are interested in whether clients and therapists are satisfied with this clinical service and its processes. The second objective is to assess program effectiveness, specifically whether coparenting, family functioning, and child mental health problems improve across the course of the program and in the months following. Importance. Brief therapies with a systemic lens can increase cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and treatment retention. They also have potential to fill an apparent gap in service needs as up to three-quarters of youth with psychological concerns never receive treatment (5). Thus, brief services can provide more timely access to mental health care in Canada which have potential for reducing wait times, preventing further deterioration in mental health, and avoiding more intensive and expensive higher levels of care (e.g., acute inpatient mental health services; (6)). The LFP-B has potential to be widely used as a brief family-based therapy program with Canadian families to support child and family functioning in a timely and non-intensive manner.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Age:2 - 9

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Imminent Risk Of Harm

      30 Participants Needed

      Best Practice Advisory Alerts for Heart Failure

      Falls Church, Virginia
      A randomized, single-blind intervention trial to test the comparative effectiveness of an electronic health record best practice advisory system that informs clinicians of guideline-indicated and FDA-approved heart failure medications currently not prescribed to their patients with heart failure versus usual care (no alert and how things are done currently). The purpose of the alert is to stimulate appropriate medication prescription for patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction. This will be done across outpatient Inova clinics and at the five Inova hospitals.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Hospice, Prior Heart Transplant, Others

      5000 Participants Needed

      Nudge Communication for Flu Vaccination

      Bethesda, Maryland
      In randomized clinical trials and observational studies, influenza vaccination is effective in reducing influenza-related illness and hospitalizations and potentially cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality in select populations. However, the potential population-level benefit of influenza vaccination is limited by its uptake. Novel implementation strategies to improve vaccination uptake are needed. KP VACCINATE is a multicenter, sequential, individual-level randomized controlled implementation trial examining the effectiveness of a CV-focused nudging communication vs. usual care communication on influenza vaccination uptake among Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) and Kaiser Permanente Mid Atlantic States (KPMAS) eligible members during the 2024-2025 influenza season.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Messaging Opt-out, Unknown Service Area, Others

      3668428 Participants Needed

      PositiveLinks mHealth Platform for HIV/AIDS

      Washington, District of Columbia
      To achieve the end of the HIV epidemic, concerted efforts will be needed to address the HIV care continuum, including improving retention in care (RIC) and viral suppression (VS) among persons with HIV (PWH). In the U.S., less than 50% of PWH are RIC and even fewer are VS. Studies have shown that these PWH have poorer clinical outcomes and are at risk of transmitting HIV to others, hence the need for innovative solutions to improve retention in care and subsequent viral suppression. Theory-based mHealth interventions have been shown to be promising in reaching these at-risk groups and improving HIV-related outcomes. PositiveLinks is a clinic-deployed mHealth platform that includes patient and provider smartphone apps, a web portal for clinic staff and providers to manage patient cohorts, an online implementation guide, and a learning management system to train and certify clinic staff. It has theory-based features including daily queries of adherence, mood, and stress, graphical feedback for self-monitoring, secure messaging with staff, appointment reminders, anonymized peer support, information resources, and document upload capability to support insurance re-enrollment. A 12-month prospective study in poorly retained PWH found that PL increased RIC and VS, with app use related to benefit as well as improved social support and stigma. PL is a promising existing mHealth tool for PWH, yet its efficacy has not been tested in a randomized trial, nor in urban populations. The investigators will test the efficacy of PositiveLinks to improve RIC and VS among a cohort of PWH in a high HIV prevalence city of Washington, DC. Participants will be identified from the DC Cohort, a longitudinal prospective cohort of PWH receiving HIV care at 15 clinics in DC. First, the investigators will conduct formative research to assess the feasibility, acceptability and usability of PositiveLinks among this urban cohort and conduct subsequent adaptations based on these findings. The investigators will then conduct an efficacy study through a cluster randomized controlled trial at 12 DC Cohort sites among 482 PWH. Clinics will be randomized to PL or usual care. Primary outcomes will include VS, RIC, and visit constancy at 12 months. Finally, the investigators will conduct mixed methods implementation science research guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and RE-AIM to identify site, patient, provider, and system factors that characterize best practices in program implementation. If successful, this research will lead to the development of a novel and efficacious approach to improving RIC and VS among PWH which could lead to dissemination research that will contribute to HIV epidemic control. This project is responsive to NIH priorities, National HIV/AIDS Strategy, and Ending the HIV Epidemic goals as it is cross-cutting, seeks to reduce health inequities, and to improve health outcomes to achieve sustained viral suppression in a geographic hotspot for HIV.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Age:16+

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Age Below 16, Others

      753 Participants Needed

      Referral Program for Cardiac Rehabilitation

      Nashville, Tennessee
      This study will test whether the Veterans Cardiac Rehabilitation Referral Program (VCR2P) improves cardiac rehabilitation participation by studying 816 Veterans across three VA medical centers in Nashville, Dallas, and Gainesville over 12 months. The trial compares referral rates from the 6 months before implementing the program to 6 months after, using a "before and after" design since randomization would be impractical. The study will measure whether the program increases the proportion of eligible Veterans who receive cardiac rehabilitation referrals and whether more Veterans actually attend rehabilitation sessions. Additionally, focus groups with physicians, nurses, and Veterans will identify what helps or hinders the program's success, providing essential insights for expanding this intervention to other VA facilities nationwide if it proves effective.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Death, Cognitive Impairment, Arrhythmias, Others

      816 Participants Needed

      Multidisciplinary Care Planning for Surgery in Veterans with Frailty

      Nashville, Tennessee
      The PAUSE Trial is a pragmatic, randomized clinical trial for Veterans scheduled for elective surgery at 3 large VA facilities (Palo Alto, Houston, and Nashville). The PAUSE Trial focuses on cooperation between providers of various disciplines in order to provide better care. Veterans identified as frail upon standardized will be referred to a multidisciplinary "PAUSE Board" comprised of members from surgery, anesthesia, geriatrics, palliative care, case management, rehabilitation, and nutrition. Diverse specialists will come together in a team environment to discuss care options, scientific evidence, and patient goals and expectations, creating individual patient recommendations. The investigators hypothesize that the PAUSE Board model will improve quality and outcomes by promoting guidelines and evidence-based care recommendations as well as constructive team-based discussions to align care with patient goals and expectations.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Non-veteran, Refusal, Others

      35015 Participants Needed

      Education Strategies for Concussions

      Milwaukee, Wisconsin
      The purpose of this study is to develop and validate ways to provide better patient education and clinical management for individuals who go to the emergency department (ED) with concussion or mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Psychiatric Hold, Dementia, Terminal Cancer, Others

      5831 Participants Needed

      Advance Care Planning for Affordable Housing Residents

      Nashville, Tennessee
      Affordable housing residents continue to experience multi-faceted insecurity and advance care planning (ACP) challenges even after obtaining secure housing, resulting in significant inequities in quality of care during times of cognitive incapacity. To promote proactive planning for affordable housing residents, this proposal is for a pilot study to test a novel trauma-informed care adapted advance care planning intervention with the following aims: to test initial efficacy of the intervention on ACP outcomes (Aim 1) and determine resident perceptions of intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility and perceived implementation barriers and facilitators (Aim 2). These data will support the development of a larger scale study of ACP interventions within a resiliency-based hub model to comprehensively support whole-person care and proactive planning for times of cognitive incapacity.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Not Listed

      30 Participants Needed

      Why Other Patients Applied

      "My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."

      HZ
      Arthritis PatientAge: 78

      "I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer three months ago, metastatic to my liver, and I have been receiving and responding well to chemotherapy. My blood work revealed that my tumor markers have gone from 2600 in the beginning to 173 as of now, even with the delay in treatment, they are not going up. CT Scans reveal they have been shrinking as well. However, chemo is seriously deteriorating my body. I have 4 more treatments to go in this 12 treatment cycle. I am just interested in learning about my other options, if any are available to me."

      ID
      Pancreatic Cancer PatientAge: 40

      "I've tried several different SSRIs over the past 23 years with no luck. Some of these new treatments seem interesting... haven't tried anything like them before. I really hope that one could work."

      ZS
      Depression PatientAge: 51

      "As a healthy volunteer, I like to participate in as many trials as I'm able to. It's a good way to help research and earn money."

      IZ
      Healthy Volunteer PatientAge: 38

      "I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."

      FF
      ADHD PatientAge: 31
      Match to a Implementation Trial

      Virtual Reality Dietary Counseling for Fatty Liver Disease

      Hershey, Pennsylvania
      Metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease, often referred to as "fatty liver disease", is a leading cause of liver failure. Dietary weight loss is a cornerstone of treating fatty liver disease, but access to traditional in-person nutritional education is often limited by cost, availability, and transportation. Immersive virtual reality (iVR) has the potential to not only overcome these barriers, but also provide an interactive learning experience, such as measuring and preparing foods. Therefore, the investigators have created and validated an iVR dietician program known as the Immersive Virtual Alimentation and Nutrition (IVAN) using evidence-informed practices from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. The goal of this project is to translate the IVAN program from human and patient research to practice and community research. The investigators plan to accomplish this by performing a randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of the IVAN program in combination with synchronous audio/video dietary counseling on self-reported dietary intake and weight compared to in-person counseling. Concurrently, the investigators will provide a survey assessing implementation outcomes to both groups as well as the dietician at each study visit, and crossover the intervention at study completion so all participants assess the IVAN program. Additionally, the investigators will have clinic health care providers experience the IVAN program and assess implementation outcomes.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Pregnant, Institutionalized, Other Liver Disease, Others

      24 Participants Needed

      Video Gaming Technology for Arm Recovery After Stroke

      Baltimore, Maryland
      The investigators are investigating ways to incorporate new technologies that can enhance functional outcome after neurological insult into the patient recovery space. In order to accelerate the translation of these technologies to patient care spaces, the investigators need to identify the locations that are feasible for its use. Currently the investigators are using video game technologies that are used to maximize motor recovery of impaired upper extremities after neurological insult in the outpatient (clinic) setting. These technologies interface with robotics and other hardware to create a therapy experience that is fun, engaging, dynamic, challenging, and promotes repetitions that are otherwise difficult to achieve during conventional post-stroke rehabilitation. The investigators think early use of these technologies could enhance recovery of the arm, but It is not known if use of these technologies in the early post-stroke recovery period is safe and feasible.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Age:21 - 90

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Vision Impairment, Heart Condition, Seizures, Others

      60 Participants Needed

      Customized Handoff Protocols for ICU Patient Safety

      Baltimore, Maryland
      The investigators will leverage implementation science and engineering to adapt, implement, and rigorously evaluate tailored postoperative handoff protocols and implementation strategies. In doing so, the investigators will develop a vital understanding of the factors needed for successful and sustained use of evidence-based interventions in acute care. This knowledge will inform approaches to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap that prevents effective interventions from realizing the promise of improved patient outcomes in acute care settings.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Research Staff

      4000 Participants Needed

      Beauty Salon Program for High Blood Pressure

      Baltimore, Maryland
      CROWN is a two-arm, cluster-randomized pilot trial testing the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a salon-based cardiovascular intervention - training stylists as Heart Health Stylists to conduct in-salon blood pressure screenings, home monitoring with telehealth support, community health-worker coaching, and pharmacist-led medication management - among Black and Hispanic women with hypertension.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Sex:Female

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Renal Disease, Cognitive Impairment, Others

      144 Participants Needed

      Antibiotic Stewardship Strategy for Sepsis

      Baltimore, Maryland
      This trial aims to reduce the overuse of the antibiotic vancomycin in children's intensive care units by creating guidelines, educating doctors, and monitoring their usage. This approach targets both patients and clinicians to prevent kidney damage caused by unnecessary antibiotic use. Vancomycin has been frequently overused, leading to different methods aimed at reducing its inappropriate use and preventing resistance.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Volunteers, Limited English Proficiency

      52500 Participants Needed

      Ultrasound Training for Emergency Medicine

      Durham, North Carolina
      The aim of this study is to assess emergency medicine physician and advanced practice provider (APP) knowledge and technical skill in performance of a point-of-care ultrasound simulation and just-in-time training pathway to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and usability of the ultrasound training program. By performing this study, we hope to create a standardized training model which could potentially facilitate point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) clinical performance and thereby improve patient care.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Non-APPs

      75 Participants Needed

      Secure Firearm Storage Program for Child Safety

      Springfield, Illinois
      This randomized controlled trial will take place in up to 15 community health centers across the state of Illinois. Researchers will be studying S.A.F.E. Firearm, a program that aims to increase secure storage of firearms in homes with children. Specifically, S.A.F.E. Firearm includes a brief conversation between pediatric clinicians and parents about secure firearm storage and an offer of a free cable firearm lock within the well-child visit. Researchers will also study a package of strategies to help pediatric clinics incorporate this new practice. The strategies include training for clinic personnel and facilitation, or tailored problem-solving support. The questions the study aims to answer are: * How effective is the package of strategies at helping pediatric clinics adopt this new practice? * How effective is the S.A.F.E. Firearm program at changing parents' and guardians' firearm storage behavior? Some parents and guardians will be invited to complete a brief survey after their visit about their experiences receiving S.A.F.E. Firearm. Some community health center personnel will also be invited to complete an interview about their experiences with S.A.F.E. Firearm and the package of strategies.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased

      666 Participants Needed

      Hospital-Based Walking Program for Early Mobilization

      Durham, North Carolina
      Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0 aims to compare implementation strategies for large-scale spread of STRIDE, a supervised walking program for hospitalized older Veterans. The overall goal is to implement, evaluate, and sustain STRIDE in 32 additional VA hospitals using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Age:60+

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Not Listed

      35 Participants Needed

      Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia

      Durham, North Carolina
      Implementing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia with Older Veterans (SWELL): Function QUERI 3.0 aims to compare implementation approaches while also gathering information on clinical effectiveness of the EBP in its new context. The overall goal is to address a key priority within the implementation science field - identifying and refining metrics for equity and impact. The overall goal is to implement, evaluate, and sustain SWELL in 20 VA facilities using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid study framework and parallel CRT design.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
      Trial Phase:Unphased
      Age:60+

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Under 60, Uncontrolled Seizures, Bipolar I, Others

      20 Participants Needed

      Group Physical Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis

      Durham, North Carolina
      Implementing Group Physical Therapy (PT) for Veterans with Knee Osteoarthritis (OA): Function QUERI 2.0 (Group PT) aims to implement, evaluate and sustain Group PT in 16 VA sites using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework, which will compare implementation strategies while also gathering information about the clinical intervention and related outcomes.
      No Placebo Group

      Trial Details

      Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting

      Key Eligibility Criteria

      Disqualifiers:Not Listed

      18 Participants Needed

      1234

      Know someone looking for new options?
      Spread the word

      Why We Started Power

      We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.

      Bask
      Bask GillCEO at Power
      Learn More About Trials
      How Do Clinical Trials Work?Are Clinical Trials Safe?What Can I Expect During a Clinical Trial?
      Match to a Trial
      Match to a Trial

      Frequently Asked Questions

      How much do Implementation clinical trials pay?

      Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.

      How do Implementation clinical trials work?

      After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Implementation trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Implementation is 12 months.

      How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?

      Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.

      What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?

      The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.

      Do I need to be insured to participate in a Implementation medical study?

      Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.

      What are the newest Implementation clinical trials?

      Most recently, we added Referral Program for Cardiac Rehabilitation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia and Mobile Health App for Urinary Incontinence to the Power online platform.