Condition
Suggested Conditions
- Anxiety
- Depression
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Weight Loss
- Heart Disease
- Cancer
- Asthma
Location
Search Clinical Trials
Conditions
Locations
Treatment Type
Trial Phase
Trial Status
Paid Participation
Clear All
25 Cochlear Implants Trials Near You
Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Cochlear Implants patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.
Learn More About PowerCochlear Implant Stimulation for Usher Syndrome
Columbus, Ohio
Usher syndrome (USH) causes extensive degeneration in the cochlear nerve (CN), especially in CN fibers innervating the base of the cochlea. As the first step toward developing evidence-based practice for managing implant patients with USH, this study evaluates local neural health, as well as the neural encoding of temporal and spectral cues at the CN in implanted patients with USH. Aim 1 will determine local CN health in patients with USH by assessing the sensitivity of the electrically evoked compound action potential to changes in interphase gap and pulse polarity. Aim 2 will determine group differences in neural encoding of temporal and spectral cues at the CN between patients with USH and patients with idiopathic hearing loss. Aim 3 will use supervised machine learning techniques to develop an objective tool for assessing the electrode-neuron interface at individual electrode locations.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Age:1 - 85
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Severe Medical Comorbidities, Electrode Malposition, Others
44 Participants Needed
This study is a prospective, clinical study to determine if it is safe and effective to use a cochlear implant over time in individuals undergoing removal of a vestibular schwannoma (VS), benign tumor of the hearing and balance nerve or undergoing a labyrinthectomy for treatment of Meniere's disease. Individuals undergoing these surgeries will be deaf on the surgical side after the procedure. Currently, cochlear implants are approved for use and not considered investigational in individuals with hearing loss on both sides. However, use of a cochlear implant for these patient populations (single-sided hearing loss) will be considered a new use of an approved device. Participants undergoing surgery to remove a VS or having a labyrinthectomy will have a cochlear implant inserted after the surgical procedure for clinical care. Approximately 4 weeks after surgery, participants will be fitted with an external speech processor on the surgical side that will stimulate the internal cochlear implant. Participants will return at the following intervals after the initial processor fitting: 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months. At each interval, participants will complete questionnaires on how they are hearing with the implant and their quality of life with the implant and be tested on their ability to hear sounds and understand speech. Potential risks are those associated with all cochlear implant surgeries, and include device failure resulting in removal of device, irritation or redness in surgical area and/or area where processor is attached, increased ringing in the ear, facial nerve stimulation and a change in the way speech and other sounds sound through the implant. Potential benefits to individual participants in this study include improvement in detection and speech understanding of the surgical ear. Participants may also experience improved abilities to locate sound and understand speech in noise as the result of having hearing on both sides.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Bilateral Meniere's, Bilateral Schwannomas, Others
15 Participants Needed
Gene Therapy for Congenital Hearing Loss
Cincinnati, Ohio
Regeneron is conducting a study of an investigational new drug called DB-OTO. DB-OTO is a gene therapy that is being developed to treat children who have hearing loss due to changes in the otoferlin gene.
The purpose of this study is to:
* Learn about the safety of DB-OTO
* Determine how well DB-OTO is tolerated (does not cause ongoing discomfort)
* Evaluate the efficacy of DB-OTO (how well DB-OTO works)
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 1, 2
Age:< 17
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cochlear Implants, Malignancies, Meningitis, Others
22 Participants Needed
Drug-Releasing Cochlear Implant for Hearing Loss
Cleveland, Ohio
This clinical study will test a new type of cochlear implant known as CI632D. This experimental cochlear implant has been designed to slowly release a drug called dexamethasone. Dexamethasone works to ease inflammation and reduce tissue injury, which is common after any type of surgery. The goal is to learn if the dexamethasone in the CI632D implant lessens these reactions inside the ear following surgery and if this makes the implant work as well, or even better, in improving hearing than what would be expected with a standard cochlear implant. The study will be conducted in adults with sensorineural hearing loss, a type of hearing loss caused by damage to the inner ear or auditory nerve (the nerve that carries sound signals from the ear to the brain). The study participants will receive the CI632D experimental implant and will complete tests to see how well they are hearing and how well the implant is working.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Autoimmune Disease, Otitis Media, Meniere's, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Corticosteroids
56 Participants Needed
Cochlear Implants for Hearing Loss
Cleveland, Ohio
This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cochlear implantation for adults with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who currently do not meet the FDA-approved indications for cochlear implantation. Following cochlear implantation, participants will complete speech perception assessments and questionnaires over the course of seven visits.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Cochlear Implant, Ear Infection, Others
50 Participants Needed
Personalized Cochlear Implant Mapping for Hearing Loss
London, Ontario
The current standard of care approach for programming cochlear implants uses a generalized pitch-map for all patients. This approach fails to account for individualized inner ear anatomy. As a result, many cochlear implant recipients experience place-pitch mismatch. We have recently developed an automated mathematical tool to produce patient-specific, customized cochlear implant pitch-maps (Helpard et al., 2021). In this study, cochlear implant recipients will be randomized to receive either the clinical default pitch-map (the control group) or a place-based pitch-map (the intervention group).
Assessments will be conducted at multiple time-intervals to account for patient acclimation and plasticity to both the generalized and individualized pitch-maps. Audiological assessments will be tuned to identify patients' ability to discern pitch scaling and variation in sounds, as well as to understand complexities in speech such as mood and tone. Audiological testing will be conducted in collaboration with the National Centre for Audiology (London, ON) to ensure that the most accurate and relevant metrics are applied.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cognitive Issues, Others
30 Participants Needed
Opto-electrical Stimulation for Hearing Loss
Winfield, Illinois
Neural stimulation with photons has been proposed for a next generation of cochlear implants (CIs). The potential benefit of photonic over electrical stimulation is its spatially selective activation of small populations of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs). Stimulating smaller neuron populations along the cochlea provides a larger number of independent channels to encode acoustic information. Hearing could therefore be restored at a higher fidelity and performance in noisy listening environments as well as music appreciation are likely to improve .
While it has been demonstrated that optical radiation evokes auditory responses in animal models, it is not clear whether the radiant exposures used in the animal experiments are sufficient to stimulate the auditory system of humans. The proposed tests are:
1. to demonstrate that light delivery systems (LDSs) can be inserted and oriented optimally in the human cochlea.
2. to show that the LDSs are able to deliver sufficient amount of energy to evoke a compound action potential of the auditory nerve.
3. to validate that the fluence rate (energy / target area) required for stimulation is below the maximal fluence rate, which damaged the cochlea in animal experiments.
4. to show that combined optical and electrical stimulation is able to significantly lower the threshold required for optical stimulation in humans.
The endpoints for the study are either the completion of the experiments proposed or the demonstration that not sufficient energy can be delivered safely in the human cochlea to develop an action potential.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Minors, Prisoners, Others
30 Participants Needed
Remote Auditory Training for Cochlear Implant Users
Toronto, Ontario
Multi-channel cochlear implants have been highly successful in restoring speech understanding to individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss. Optimal programs facilitate access to sound but do not necessarily result in optimal performance. Practiced listening with auditory inputs is required to retrain the brain to hear using a cochlear implant. In some cases exposure to sound in everyday listening is sufficient; however, in others there is a need for the provision of auditory training (AT) by a trained professional. In these cases it is important to have regular visits with a specialist to: 1) facilitate auditory training exercises; 2) work with the family/friends to encourage optimal communication strategies in the home; 3) evaluate and assess achievement of listening goals.
This study seeks to evaluate the feasibility of providing auditory training services remotely for patient populations located outside of Toronto. This study also seeks to evaluate interindividual perspectives regarding access and benefits of these services across remote and in person sessions.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
40 Participants Needed
Revision Surgery for Cochlear Implant Tissue Growth
Nashville, Tennessee
It is known from post-mortem histological studies that a significant portion of individuals who undergo cochlear implantation (CI) have scar tissue form around the implanted electrode array over time. This scar tissue affects the electrical performance of the cochlear implant, affecting how the implant stimulates the auditory nerve. It is possible that if this scar tissue was detected, the implant programming could be adjusted to account for the changing tissue properties. As part of another study, a computational modeling approach for patient-customized simulation of cochlear implant stimulation is being developed. The simulation approach uses as input CT images and electrophysiological measurements from the cochlear implant device to simulate stimulation by the cochlear implant. These computational simulation models also provide a way to estimate tissue growth around the array. Tissue growth estimates are optimized in the computational model so that electrophysiological metrics simulated by the model match measurements acquired from the patient's implant. In this study, the aim is to collect data necessary to validate these model predictions.
While the existence of tissue growth around the implanted array is not typically known for most patients, a subset of cochlear implant recipients need to undergo revision surgery when a device failure or poor placement is suspected. For these individuals, the existence of tissue growth around the array in the base of the cochlea can be visualized in the operating room by the surgeon. Individuals will be recruited who are undergoing CI revision surgery at Vanderbilt University Medical Center to participate in this study. In surgery, the presence of scar tissue growth will be evaluated by visual confirmation by the surgeon.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Age < 18, Others
24 Participants Needed
Image-Guided Programming for Cochlear Implants
Nashville, Tennessee
This trial tests a new method that uses detailed images to fine-tune cochlear implants. It targets patients who haven't improved much with standard programming. By turning off poorly placed electrodes, it aims to provide clearer hearing. This technique is developed to locate the position of cochlear implant electrodes for patient-customized settings.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Enrolling By Invitation
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Non-English Speaking, Pregnancy, Others
150 Participants Needed
Image-Guided Programming for Cochlear Implants
Nashville, Tennessee
Cochlear implants are surgically implanted devices which restore the ability to hear to the hearing impaired. Recent literature has indicated that children receiving cochlear implants (CIs) often have dramatically improved speech and language ability relative to previous generations of children with hearing loss; however, many pediatric CI recipients display persistent speech and language disorders despite early implantation and associated speech/language intervention. Cochlear implants are programmed via mapping - a process in which each individual electrode (FDA approved cochlear implants have between 12 and 22 electrodes) is turned on and the stimulus level adjusted to a level that is comfortable and beneficial to the recipient. At present, this standard of care (SOC) mapping procedure is performed without knowledge of the physical location between the cochlear implant electrodes and the neural interface. Our team has developed a new method of mapping using post-operative CT scans and image processing to specify the physical relationship between the cochlear implant electrodes and the neural interface allowing customized mapping. Using this information, the investigators deactivate sub-optimally positioned electrodes. The investigators term this "Image-guided Cochlear Implant Programming" (IGCIP). This project provides a unique opportunity to examine whether individualized, image-guided CI programming (IGCIP) significantly improves outcomes in pediatric CI patients.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Age:4 - 12
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
47 Participants Needed
Cochlear Implant + Hearing Aid for Hearing Loss
Nashville, Tennessee
Cochlear implants are surgically implanted devices which restore the ability to hear to the hearing impaired. Improvements in surgery and electrodes have results in an increased number of adults and children who have residual hearing and can benefit from electric and acoustic hearing in the same ear. This is called Electric Acoustic Stimulation (EAS). Many studies have shown that adult EAS users show significant benefits for speech understanding in noise and spatial hearing tasks as compared to a CI paired only with a contralateral HA. Even though this type of hearing is becoming more common, there is limited research on how it can be beneficial to children with CIs. The benefits of this study are a greater understanding of the participant's speech understanding, binaural processing, and spatial hearing. The results will help audiologists and researcher better understand how cochlear implants work, specifically when using electric and acoustic hearing in the same ear.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:5+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Autism, Auditory Neuropathy, Neurological Disorder, Others
160 Participants Needed
Electrocochleography for Hearing Loss
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
The purpose of this study is to see how the inner ear responds to sound delivered to the ear canal during and after your cochlear implant surgery. This information may be helpful in telling us how well a cochlear implant performs after surgery.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:1+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Chronic Otitis Media, Malformed Cochlea, Others
88 Participants Needed
Donepezil for Hearing Loss
Nashville, Tennessee
This trial tests whether donepezil can help adult cochlear implant users improve their hearing and cognitive functions. Donepezil boosts brain chemicals important for memory and learning, which may help the brain better process sounds from the implant. The study aims to see if this leads to better speech recognition and cognitive outcomes.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Early Phase 1
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Neurological Disorders, Pregnancy, Nicotine, Others
Must Be Taking:Donepezil
50 Participants Needed
Auditory-Cognitive Training for Hearing Loss
Nashville, Tennessee
The proposed study will investigate whether an auditory brain training program can improve cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in older post-lingually deafened CI users. The study will evaluate the potential benefit of training on speech recognition performance, psychosocial and cognitive function.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:60+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Single-sided Deafness, Non-fluent English
30 Participants Needed
Cochlear Implant Programming for Unilateral Hearing Loss
Durham, North Carolina
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of different audio processor frequency settings on performance outcomes in new cochlear implant users using electric-only stimulation in the implanted ear with normal hearing to moderately severe hearing loss in the opposite ear.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Bilateral Cochlear Implants, Others
50 Participants Needed
Cochlear Implant for Single-Sided Deafness
Durham, North Carolina
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of cochlear implantation in infants and toddlers with single-sided deafness.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* Are cochlear implants an effective treatment of single-sided deafness in infants and toddlers?
* Are cochlear implants a safe treatment for single-sided deafness in infants and toddlers?
Participants will receive a cochlear implant and be followed until they are five years old. During those five years, the investigators will program the device and monitor auditory development.
Children will be asked to:
* Undergo cochlear implantation
* Wear their cochlear implant processor whenever they are awake.
* Participate in traditional hearing tests
* Participate in traditional hearing testing
* Participate in localization testing
* Participate in hearing in noise testing
* Participate in word recognition testing
* Participate in speech, language, and educational evaluations
The researchers will compare results to children with typical hearing in both ears and children with single-sided deafness who have not received an implant to observe any differences between the groups.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:7 - 71
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Conductive Hearing Loss, Cochlear Nerve Deficiency, Others
60 Participants Needed
Cochlear Implant for Unilateral Hearing Loss
Saint Louis, Missouri
This is a two-phase study that compares performance growth pre-implant with current hearing aid (HA) technology versus post-implant with a cochlear implant (CI) in children with either asymmetric hearing loss (AHL) or single-sided deafness (SSD). Post-implant performance with a CI alone is expected to outperform pre-implant performance with a HA. The study also evaluates the effectiveness of bimodal hearing defined as a CI in the poor ear and a HA in the better ear for AHL or a CI in the poor ear and normal hearing in the better ear for SSD compared to pre-implant performance. The study examines factors contributing to CI outcomes.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:4 - 14
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Medical Condition Contraindicating Surgery, Others
80 Participants Needed
Robotics for Cochlear Implant Surgery
Iowa City, Iowa
Robotics-assisted electrode insertion overcomes many surgeon-related kinetic limitations such as insertion speed, tremor, drift, and lack of accurate force control. In human cadaveric cochleae, robotics-assisted electrode insertion causes less intracochlear trauma compared to manual insertion. Whether this technical advance results in functional benefits in CI patients remains unknown. To address this critical knowledge gap, the investigators will compare cochlear trauma assessed using CT scans, cochlear and AN function assessed using ECochG and/or the eCAP, and clinical outcomes quantified by postoperative residual acoustic hearing and speech perception scores between participants randomized to either manual or robotics-assisted electrode array insertion.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Surgery Contraindications, Cochlear Anomaly, Others
100 Participants Needed
Robotics and ECochG System for Hearing Loss
Iowa City, Iowa
Evaluation of the Automated Integration of a Robotics and ECochG System for Use with Cochlear Implant Surgery
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:12+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cochlear Abnormalities, Temporal Bone Fracture, Retrocochlear Etiology, Middle-ear Infection, Others
10 Participants Needed
Why Other Patients Applied
"I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."
WR
Obesity PatientAge: 58
"I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."
FF
ADHD PatientAge: 31
"My orthopedist recommended a half replacement of my right knee. I have had both hips replaced. Currently have arthritis in knee, shoulder, and thumb. I want to avoid surgery, and I'm open-minded about trying a trial before using surgery as a last resort."
HZ
Arthritis PatientAge: 78
"As a healthy volunteer, I like to participate in as many trials as I'm able to. It's a good way to help research and earn money."
IZ
Healthy Volunteer PatientAge: 38
"I've tried several different SSRIs over the past 23 years with no luck. Some of these new treatments seem interesting... haven't tried anything like them before. I really hope that one could work."
ZS
Depression PatientAge: 51
Cochlear Implant for Hearing Loss
New York, New York
The most common cochlear implant intervention provides an electrode array that stimulates less than half of the length of the cochlea, leaving the regions which represent lower frequencies in the normally functioning ear unstimulated. Providing stimulation over the entire cochlea has the potential to improve speech understanding, sound quality, as well as spectral and temporal representation. Increasing the length of the electrode array to cover a greater portion of the cochlea has many potential issues, including increased damage to the cochlea and probability of incomplete insertions. In this study, a new technique is being investigated that allows stimulation across the entire cochlear extent without increasing the length of the electrode array. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of the new technique on speech understanding outcomes. Additionally, the study will investigate the new configuration to explore how the auditory system encodes temporal and spectral information.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Under 18, Pregnancy, Others
40 Participants Needed
Auditory Training for Cochlear Implant Recipients
Rochester, Minnesota
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a free computer-based auditory training program, Sound Success (Advanced Bionics, Valencia, CA), with the current standard of care of patient-directed auditory training in improving common measures of speech recognition and cochlear implant (CI) specific quality-of-life in new adult CI recipients in their first year post-activation.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Revision Implantation, Unilateral Deafness, Others
80 Participants Needed
Visual Evoked Potentials for Hearing Loss
Lebanon, New Hampshire
This research is being done to determine whether a test that measures a "Visual Evoked Potential" can be used in a new way for individuals that have hearing loss. This test measures the participant's brain's response (so called "brain waves") to specific visual images. This study will help the investigators determine whether this test could be used to improve treatments for patients with hearing loss.
The "Visual Evoked Potential" measurement test is already used in the investigator's Neurology clinic at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center for various conditions to measure "early" brain responses that occur in the first 1-2 seconds after a new cue. Our research aims to explore your brain's response just after that early 1-2 second period by looking at a specific response called the "P300". The P300 wave is a brain response to new or different images or sounds. A visual evoked P300 has not been studied in individuals with hearing loss.
The investigators will compare the results of this test to standard auditory tests, tests of cognitive function, and cochlear implant patient outcomes to explore how these factors can predict successful use of a hearing aid or cochlear implant.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Brain Pathology, Severe Neurological Disorders, Seizure History, Blindness, Others
100 Participants Needed
Listening Effort for Hearing Loss
Minneapolis, Minnesota
People with hearing loss experience extra effort when listening, which can lead to severe psychological barriers to communication and social participation. Listening effort can lead to fatigue, mental strain, burnout, medical sick leave, and the need for increased time to recover from regular daily activities. This proposal aims to understand effort changes on a moment-to-moment basis during listening, how long the effort lasts, and how the planning and execution of effort is impacted by the experience of using a cochlear implant.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Eye Disease, Language Disabilities, Others
450 Participants Needed
The goal of this interventional clinical study is to investigate the use of mild therapeutic hypothermia for preservation of residual hearing in cochlear implant surgery. The main questions the trial aims to answer are:
1. Is mild therapeutic hypothermia safe for use during cochlear implantation?
2. Is mild therapeutic hypothermia effective at preserving residual hearing after cochlear implantation?
Participants will receive mild therapeutic hypothermia therapy during cochlear implant surgery. Researchers will compare results from those receiving the therapy to those from a control group (individuals receiving no therapy).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Under 18, Not Meeting Hearing Requirements
54 Participants Needed
Know someone looking for new options?
Spread the word
Learn More About Power
We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.
Bask GillCEO at Power
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do Cochlear Implants clinical trials pay?
Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.
How do Cochlear Implants clinical trials work?
After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Cochlear Implants trials 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length for Cochlear Implants is 12 months.
How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?
Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.
What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?
The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.
Do I need to be insured to participate in a Cochlear Implants medical study?
Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.
What are the newest Cochlear Implants clinical trials?
Most recently, we added Robotics for Cochlear Implant Surgery, Revision Surgery for Cochlear Implant Tissue Growth and Cochlear Implant Programming for Unilateral Hearing Loss to the Power online platform.
Popular Searches
By Condition
By Location
Other People Viewed
By Subject
By Trial
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.