99 Participants Needed

Functional Task Practice + Electrical Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury

CT
PB
Overseen ByPatricia Bartelt
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Craig Hospital
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial is testing three different types of physical therapy exercises to help people with spinal cord injuries regain movement in their arms and stabilize their trunk. The goal is to retrain the body to move correctly, improving overall function and stability. Participants will undergo multiple sessions and be evaluated at different stages to track their progress.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of this treatment for spinal cord injury?

Research shows that using functional electrical stimulation (FES) can help improve voluntary grasping and lower extremity function in people with spinal cord injuries. Additionally, combining wide-pulse high-frequency FES with task-specific practice has been shown to enhance upper body strength and function.12345

Is Functional Task Practice with Electrical Stimulation safe for humans?

Research on functional electrical stimulation (FES) for spinal cord injury shows it is generally safe, with studies reporting improvements in balance, strength, and cardiovascular fitness without significant safety concerns.46789

How does the treatment Functional Task Practice + Electrical Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury differ from other treatments?

This treatment combines functional task practice with electrical stimulation, which is unique because it uses electrical currents to stimulate nerves and muscles, potentially enhancing motor recovery by promoting neural plasticity (the brain's ability to reorganize itself). Unlike standard rehabilitation, this approach may offer more significant improvements in voluntary motor function by targeting both spinal and cortical networks.15101112

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for individuals with a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) who are currently in rehabilitation. They must have some movement response to electrical stimulation in their upper body muscles and no severe physical or cognitive issues that would make the treatment unsafe. It's not for those with unstable heart/lung conditions, skin injuries affecting the arms, pregnancy, recent Botox injections, or certain implanted devices.

Inclusion Criteria

SCI categorized as AIS B-D
My spinal cord injury occurred less than 5 months ago.
My spinal cord injury is between levels C1 and C8.
See 6 more

Exclusion Criteria

Implanted devices including pacemaker, spinal cord stimulator, ventriculoperitoneal shunt, deep brain stimulator, or intra-thecal pump
Pregnant
I have received Botox injections in the past 3 months.
See 2 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Baseline Evaluation

Participants undergo baseline evaluation to assess initial capabilities and gather demographic and injury information

1 week
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment

Participants receive 40 sessions of intervention focusing on functional task practice with or without functional electrical stimulation

8 weeks
40 sessions (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • FTP Alone
  • FTP+Con-FES
  • FTP+WPHF-FES
Trial OverviewThe study compares three treatments aiming to improve arm function and trunk stability after SCI: Functional Task Practice (FTP) alone; FTP combined with conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation (Con-FES); and FTP paired with Weight-Prompted Hand Function FES (WPHF-FES). Participants will undergo 40 sessions of their assigned intervention.
Participant Groups
3Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: FTP+Con-FESActive Control1 Intervention
Functional Task Practice + Conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation - Participants allocated to this group will complete 40 minutes of training focused on improving functional tasks supplemented with conventional parameter (200µs; 40Hz) functional electrical stimulation (FES). followed by 10 minutes of functional training/carryover in a relevant environment.
Group II: FTP+WPHF-FESActive Control1 Intervention
Functional Task Practice + Wide Pulse, High Frequency Functional Electrical Stimulation - Participants allocated to this group will complete 40 minutes of training focused on improving functional tasks supplemented with wide pulse, high frequency (1000µs; 100 Hz) functional electrical stimulation (FES) followed by 10 minutes of functional training/carryover in a relevant environment.
Group III: FTP AloneActive Control1 Intervention
Functional Task Practice Alone - Participants allocated to this group will complete 40 minutes of training focused on improving functional tasks followed by 10 minutes of functional training/carryover in a relevant environment without functional electrical stimulation (FES).

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Craig Hospital

Lead Sponsor

Trials
45
Recruited
8,400+

National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research

Collaborator

Trials
83
Recruited
10,500+

Findings from Research

In a study involving 72 spinal cord injury patients, functional electrical stimulation (FES) combined with robot-assisted training significantly improved both FES-assisted and voluntary muscle strength in the lower limbs, indicating enhanced motor function.
The results showed a strong correlation between increases in FES-assisted strength and voluntary muscle function, suggesting that this combined approach may effectively support recovery of residual functions after spinal cord injury.
Robot-assisted training with functional electrical stimulation enhances lower extremity function after spinal cord injury.Bersch, I., Alberty, M., Fridén, J.[2022]
In a study involving 12 individuals with complete spinal cord injury, FES-assisted dynamic load-shifting exercises led to significant increases in trabecular bone mineral density (vBMD) in the proximal and distal tibia after 29 weeks of training, indicating potential benefits for bone health in this population.
While improvements were noted in the tibia, there was no increase in vBMD in the distal femur, suggesting that the effectiveness of FES exercises may vary by bone location and type of exercise performed.
The effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation-assisted posture-shifting in bone mineral density: case series-pilot study.Armengol, M., Zoulias, ID., Gibbons, RS., et al.[2022]
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the spinal cord (TESS) significantly enhances motor-evoked potentials in arm muscles for up to 75 minutes after stimulation, indicating its potential to promote functional recovery in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI).
The study found that TESS has a dual effect: it excites spinal networks while inhibiting cortical activity, which may contribute to improved hand and arm function, especially when using a specific 5 kHz carrier frequency during stimulation.
Cortical and Subcortical Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Humans with Tetraplegia.Benavides, FD., Jo, HJ., Lundell, H., et al.[2021]

References

Functional electrical stimulation therapy of voluntary grasping versus only conventional rehabilitation for patients with subacute incomplete tetraplegia: a randomized clinical trial. [2022]
Robot-assisted training with functional electrical stimulation enhances lower extremity function after spinal cord injury. [2022]
The effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation-assisted posture-shifting in bone mineral density: case series-pilot study. [2022]
Improving Upper Extremity Strength, Function, and Trunk Stability Using Wide-Pulse Functional Electrical Stimulation in Combination With Functional Task-Specific Practice. [2023]
Cortical and Subcortical Effects of Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Humans with Tetraplegia. [2021]
Functional electric stimulation-assisted rowing: Increasing cardiovascular fitness through functional electric stimulation rowing training in persons with spinal cord injury. [2019]
A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: Effects on walking competency. [2021]
Functional Electrical Stimulation Plus Visual Feedback Balance Training for Standing Balance Performance Among Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series. [2020]
A novel paired associative stimulation protocol with a high-frequency peripheral component: A review on results in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. [2021]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Improvements in hand function in adults with chronic tetraplegia following a multiday 10-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation intervention combined with repetitive task practice. [2018]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Targeted, activity-dependent spinal stimulation produces long-lasting motor recovery in chronic cervical spinal cord injury. [2018]
12.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Effect of functional electrical stimulation (FES) combined with robotically assisted treadmill training on the EMG profile. [2020]