Surgical Techniques + Gas Tamponade for Retinal Detachment
(REDOS Trial)
Trial Summary
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.
What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment for retinal detachment?
Research shows that combining pars plana vitrectomy (a surgery to remove the gel-like substance in the eye) with a scleral buckle (a band placed around the eye) can successfully reattach the retina and improve vision in many cases. Additionally, using gas tamponade (a bubble of gas to hold the retina in place) during vitrectomy has been effective in managing certain types of retinal detachment.12345
Is the combination of surgical techniques and gas tamponade for retinal detachment generally safe for humans?
The research indicates that surgical techniques like pars plana vitrectomy, with or without scleral buckle, and the use of gas tamponade, have been studied for retinal detachment. These procedures are generally considered safe, but as with any surgery, there are risks involved, and outcomes can vary depending on the specific condition and patient.15678
How does the treatment of pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle differ from other treatments for retinal detachment?
Pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle is unique because it combines two surgical techniques: removing the vitreous gel from the eye (vitrectomy) and adding a supportive band around the eye (scleral buckle) to help reattach the retina. This combination is particularly useful for more complex cases of retinal detachment, offering a more comprehensive approach compared to using either technique alone.4791011
What is the purpose of this trial?
Background: Few large randomized controlled trials provide strong evidence to guide surgical repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. The purpose of this factorial, single-blind, randomized controlled trial is to analyze and compare the surgical outcomes, functional visual outcomes, complications, and quality of life associated with RRD repair using (A) pars plana vitrectomy only (PPV) or PPV with scleral buckle (PPV-SB) and (B) sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF6) or perfluoropropane gas (C3F8) tamponade.Methods: Eligible patients with moderately complex RRD will be randomized 1:1 to PPV or PPV-SB and 1:1 to SF6 or C3F8 gas tamponade. Approximately 560 patients will be recruited to be able to detect a difference of around 10% in SSAS rate between groups. Patients will be followed using multimodal imaging and quality of life questionnaires before and after the surgical repair until 1 year postoperative. The primary outcome will be single surgery anatomic success (SSAS), defined as absence of reoperation for recurrent RRD in the operating room. Secondary outcomes will be pinhole visual acuity (PHVA) at 8-10 weeks and 6 months, final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), final retina status (i.e., attached or detached), time to onset of RRD recurrence, severity and number of complications, and questionnaire results.Discussion: This will be the first 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial examining repair techniques in primary RRD. It will also be the first randomized controlled trial to compare gas tamponade between the two most common agents. Notably, it will be adequately powered to detect a clinically significant effect size. The use of multimodal imaging will also be a novel aspect of this study, allowing us to compare head-to-head the impact of adding an SB to the retina's recovery after RRD repair and of differing gas tamponades. Until now, the treatment of RRD has been largely guided by pragmatic retrospective cohort studies. There is a lack of strong evidence guiding therapeutic decisions and this trial will address (1) whether supplemental SB is justified and (2) whether longer duration gas tamponade with C3F8 is necessary.
Research Team
Ali Dirani, MD MSc MPH
Principal Investigator
CHU de Québec - Université Laval
Mélanie Hébert, MD MSc
Principal Investigator
CHU de Québec - Université Laval
Eligibility Criteria
This trial is for adults over 18 with a recent diagnosis of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. It's not suitable for those with advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy, long-standing detachments over 3 months old, or other complex eye conditions like severe diabetic retinopathy, macular holes, or history of certain eye surgeries.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Surgical Treatment
Participants undergo surgical repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using pars plana vitrectomy with or without scleral buckle and gas tamponade
Postoperative Follow-up
Participants are monitored using multimodal imaging and quality of life questionnaires to assess surgical outcomes, visual outcomes, and complications
Treatment Details
Interventions
- Pars plana vitrectomy
- Pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle
- Perfluoropropane gas
- Sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade
Pars plana vitrectomy is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada for the following indications:
- Ovarian cancer
- Small cell lung cancer
- Cervical cancer
- Ovarian cancer
- Small cell lung cancer
- Cervical cancer
- Ovarian cancer
- Small cell lung cancer
- Cervical cancer
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
Lead Sponsor
Fighting Blindness Canada
Collaborator