4200 Participants Needed

Airway & Compression Techniques for Cardiac Arrest

(FACT Trial)

JB
Overseen ByJenny B Shin
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of Washington
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to improve treatments for individuals experiencing sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, where the heart stops beating outside a hospital. It compares two breathing techniques used during emergency care: one with a bag valve mask (BVM) and the other with an i-gel device, a type of airway management device, to determine which improves survival rates. The trial also examines different chest compression rates during CPR to identify the most effective pace. Adults in Seattle and King County who experience sudden cardiac arrest and receive basic life support from emergency responders may meet the trial criteria. As an unphased trial, this study allows participants to contribute to vital research that could enhance emergency care for cardiac arrest patients.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether participants need to stop taking their current medications.

What prior data suggests that these airway and compression techniques are safe for cardiac arrest patients?

Research shows that both the i-gel device and certain chest compression rates used in CPR are safe for people. The i-gel assists breathing when someone cannot breathe independently. Studies have found that paramedics find the i-gel easy to use and effective in delivering air to the lungs.

For chest compressions during CPR, research suggests that about 107 compressions per minute is ideal. This pace helps blood flow to the brain and heart during an emergency. Other studies indicate that a slightly faster rate, between 121 and 140 compressions per minute, can also improve survival chances.

Both the i-gel and the chest compression rates tested in this trial are already used in real-life emergencies by medical professionals. They are generally well-tolerated and considered safe.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores new ways to improve outcomes in cardiac arrest situations. Unlike standard practices that focus on a universal chest compression rate and basic airway management techniques, this trial looks at varying compression rates (100, 110, and 120 compressions per minute) and compares two airway strategies: the traditional bag-valve-mask (BVM) and the i-gel device. The i-gel is particularly interesting because it’s designed for a quick and easy fit, potentially offering more effective airway management without the need for complex procedures. By testing these variables, researchers hope to discover optimal techniques that could enhance survival rates and recovery in cardiac arrest cases.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for sudden cardiac arrest?

In this trial, participants will join different treatment arms to evaluate the effectiveness of various chest compression rates and airway strategies during cardiac arrest. Research has shown that the speed of chest compressions doesn't greatly affect survival rates for sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). However, one study suggested that performing about 107 compressions per minute might be optimal when paired with a certain depth. Participants in the compression rate arm will experience one of three chest compression rates: 100, 110, or 120 compressions per minute.

For the airway strategy arm, participants will receive treatment with either the BVM or the i-gel airway device. Studies indicate that the i-gel is easy to insert successfully and may lead to better outcomes than other airway tools. The i-gel is also known for being cost-effective and efficient in emergencies. Overall, both the chest compression rate and the i-gel device meet established guidelines, making them reliable options for standard care.46789

Who Is on the Research Team?

TR

Thomas Rea, MD

Principal Investigator

University of Washington

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults in Seattle and greater King County who experience a sudden, non-traumatic cardiac arrest outside of the hospital where EMS will attempt resuscitation.

Inclusion Criteria

Adults suffering out-of-hospital non-traumatic SCA in Seattle and greater King County in whom resuscitation will be attempted by first responding EMS personnel.

Exclusion Criteria

Other protected populations (pediatrics)
Known prisoner
Known pregnancy
See 6 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

1-2 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive basic life support treatments including rescue breathing with either BVM or i-gel and chest compressions at varying rates

Immediate intervention during cardiac arrest event

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for survival to hospital discharge and neurological function

6 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Compression Rate
  • i-gel
Trial Overview The FACT Study compares two rescue breathing methods (standard Bag Valve Mask vs i-gel) and three chest compression rates (100, 110, or 120 per minute) during CPR to see which leads to better survival rates after cardiac arrest.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Compression RateActive Control1 Intervention
Group II: Airway StrategyActive Control1 Intervention

Compression Rate is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Chest Compression Rate for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Rate for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Chest Compression Rate for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Washington

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,858
Recruited
2,023,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

The Radarcirc ECG demonstrated significantly better accuracy in detecting ventricular fibrillation during CPR compared to the conventional ECG, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.987 for lead I, indicating its potential for improved clinical outcomes.
In a study involving 41 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients, the Radarcirc ECG provided more reliable rhythm assessments during chest compressions, suggesting it could enhance the effectiveness of CPR by minimizing diagnostic errors.
Diagnostic performance of a new multifunctional electrocardiograph during uninterrupted chest compressions in cardiac arrest patients.Shimpuku, G., Morimura, N., Sakamoto, T., et al.[2019]
The i-gel has a higher success rate for airway management in cardiac arrest patients (94% and 92%) compared to endotracheal tube insertion (90% and 86%), making it a preferred choice for prehospital resuscitation.
The use of i-gel is increasing among emergency staff, as it allows for faster insertion and enables quicker progression to other resuscitation efforts, although some staff still prefer ET tubes due to confidence issues with new equipment.
Introduction of the I-gel supraglottic airway device for prehospital airway management in a UK ambulance service.Duckett, J., Fell, P., Han, K., et al.[2016]
In a study of 222 adult patients experiencing in-hospital cardiac arrest, a chest compression rate of 121-140 compressions per minute was associated with the highest likelihood of achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), with an odds ratio of 4.48.
The findings suggest that increasing the chest compression rate above the current guideline recommendation of 100-120 compressions per minute may improve outcomes in cardiac arrest situations.
Association between chest compression rates and clinical outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest at an academic tertiary hospital.Kilgannon, JH., Kirchhoff, M., Pierce, L., et al.[2022]

Citations

Temporal analysis of continuous chest compression rate ...This analysis investigates the effect of CPR duration on the performance of continuous CCs delivered by firefighters equipped with CPR feedback devices.
CPR with Chest Compression Alone or with Rescue ...The survival rate among patients with a noncardiac cause of arrest was 5.0% with instructions to perform chest compression alone, as compared with 7.2% with ...
The Relationship Between Chest Compression Rates and ...Chest compression rate was not significantly associated with survival to hospital discharge in multivariable categorical or cubic spline models. Conclusions.
Relationship Between Chest Compression Rates and ...Chest compression rate was associated with return of spontaneous circulation but not with survival to hospital discharge in OOH cardiac arrest.
Optimal Combination of Compression Rate and Depth ...The optimal combination of chest compression rate was 107 compressions per minute and chest compression depth of 4.7 cm.
CPR Facts and StatsAccording to 2021 US data for adult OHCA only, survival to hospital discharge was 9.1% for all EMS-treated non-traumatic OHCA cardiac arrests. View more Heart ...
Recent advances and controversies in adult ...For every minute without CPR, survival from witnessed ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest decreases by 7–10%. Ischaemic heart disease is the leading ...
Part 1: Executive Summary: 2025 ...Bystander-witnessed adult arrests where bystander CPR was initiated had a 13.0% survival to hospital discharge compared with the 7.6% survival ...
Association between chest compression rates and clinical ...In this sample of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest patients, we found a chest compression rate of 121–140 compressions/min to have the highest odds ratio of ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security