320 Participants Needed

Oral Nicotine Products for Nicotine Addiction

JR
Overseen ByJohn R Monterosso, PhD
Age: 18 - 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of Southern California
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Approved in 2 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

There has been a recent proliferation of novel oral nicotine products (ONPs) brought to market, including new nicotine gums and pouches. Unlike electronic cigarettes (ECs) ONPs have no impending regulatory barriers with regard to flavoring or nicotine dose, and manufacturers have capitalized on this by introducing an extensive slate of characterizing flavors and nicotine concentrations. Both sales trajectory and the surge in marketing suggest ONP use is likely to increase in the coming years. Work by the investigators and others indicates that interest in these products is high among current EC users, and among specific demographic groups including those who identify as sexual and gender minority (SGM). ONP use is discrete and so can function as a secondary source of nicotine, encouraging dual use patterns and more severe nicotine dependence. Depending on the use patterns of ONPs that emerge, regulation of ONPs may serve the public health interest. However, very little is known about factors relevant to the actual appeal and abuse liability of these products. The investigators propose to address this important gap by assessing the appeal and abuse liability of gum and pouch ONPs as a function of flavor (mint vs fruit) and nicotine concentration (2mg vs. 4mg). Flavor and nicotine strength, along with product type, are regulatable attributes, and so it is essential to understand their impact on appeal and abuse liability. Evidence from EC use suggests a potential interaction between flavor and nicotine strength, with flavorants in the "mint" category desensitizing receptors integral to the aversive sensory experience of nicotine, leading to greater tolerability of high nicotine concentration. Because of current ONP marketing emphasis on youth, the investigators will recruit young adult exclusive EC users (N = 320; ages 21 - 25). The investigators will target recruitment of a sufficient number of SGM participants (N = 64, 20% of sample) to allow assessment of potential differentiation of this group. Participants will complete one virtual session focused on assessment of the sensory appeal of ONPs. Based on individual participant ratings, the preferred fruit and the preferred mint ONP will be selected (from their randomized product type and nicotine strength) to each be assessed in a single-product session examining factors known to predict abuse liability (relief of withdrawal, liking, behavioral economic indices of demand, and follow-up naturalistic product use). The investigators will pay particular attention to evidence suggesting dual use potential of ONPs, given its association with greater severity of nicotine dependence. The proposed work will inform efforts to mitigate ONPs potential to promote dual-use and more severe nicotine dependence among young adult EC users, by isolating the impact of potential regulatory targets.

Do I need to stop my current medications to join the trial?

The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. However, it does require that you are not using any other tobacco or nicotine products besides electronic cigarettes.

What data supports the idea that Oral Nicotine Products for Nicotine Addiction is an effective treatment?

The available research shows that oral nicotine products like Zonnic pouches can help reduce withdrawal symptoms and increase user satisfaction compared to a placebo. In a study, Zonnic pouches were compared to nicotine gum and a placebo, and they were found to be effective in relieving withdrawal discomfort after not smoking overnight. This suggests that oral nicotine products can be a helpful treatment for nicotine addiction. Additionally, these products may be more acceptable to users, which is important for their success as a treatment.12345

What safety data exists for oral nicotine products?

Existing safety data for oral nicotine products, such as nicotine pouches, gums, and lozenges, indicate that they may serve as a lower-risk alternative to traditional tobacco products like cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. Studies have shown that users of products like ZYN and Velo have significantly lower exposure to harmful tobacco toxicants compared to smokers. Biomarkers of potential harm and exposure are more favorable in users of these products, suggesting a reduced risk of smoking-related diseases. However, the long-term public health impact of these products is still unknown.26789

Is the treatment 'Oral Nicotine Products for Nicotine Addiction' a promising treatment?

Yes, oral nicotine products like pouches, lozenges, and gums are promising because they help people quit smoking by reducing withdrawal symptoms and are becoming popular, especially among young people.45101112

Research Team

JR

John R Monterosso, PhD

Principal Investigator

University of Southern California

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for young adult electronic cigarette users aged 21-25, with a focus on including sexual and gender minority participants. It's designed to understand how flavor (mint vs fruit) and nicotine strength (2mg vs 4mg) in oral nicotine products affect their appeal and potential for abuse.

Inclusion Criteria

I am willing to try the study's oral nanoparticle drugs.
I am between 21 and 25 years old.
I have never used any opioid narcotics.
See 2 more

Exclusion Criteria

Recent COVID-19+ (positive test in the past 30 days)
I was hospitalized for COVID-19 in the last 3 months.
Currently pregnant (based on urine pregnancy test), planning to become pregnant, or breastfeeding.
See 2 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks
1 visit (virtual)

Orientation

Participants complete an orientation session to provide informed consent and confirm eligibility

1 week
1 visit (virtual)

Sensory Appeal Session

Participants rate the appeal and sensory attributes of different ONPs after self-administration

1 day
1 visit (virtual)

Abuse Liability Sessions

Participants undergo two sessions to assess abuse liability of ONPs, including self-administration and monitoring

2 weeks
2 visits (virtual)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for naturalistic use of ONPs and dual use liability

7 days after each abuse liability session
Daily electronic surveys

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Oral Nicotine Products
Trial Overview The study examines the impact of different flavors and nicotine concentrations in gum and pouch oral nicotine products on their attractiveness and risk of misuse. Participants will rate these factors during virtual sessions, which could inform future regulations.
Participant Groups
4Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Low Nicotine GumActive Control2 Interventions
Participants in this arm will only use Lucy brand 2mg nicotine gum
Group II: High Nicotine PouchActive Control2 Interventions
Participants in this arm will only use ON! brand 6mg nicotine pouches
Group III: High Nicotine GumActive Control2 Interventions
Participants in this arm will only use Lucy brand 6mg nicotine gum
Group IV: Low Nicotine PouchActive Control2 Interventions
Participants in this arm will only use ON! brand 2mg nicotine pouches

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Southern California

Lead Sponsor

Trials
956
Recruited
1,609,000+

Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

Collaborator

Trials
184
Recruited
1,553,000+

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

Trials
14,080
Recruited
41,180,000+

Findings from Research

In a study involving 63 smokers, both snus and Zonnic were preferred over nicotine gum, showing greater effectiveness in reducing smoking urges and causing fewer side effects.
Participants experienced significant reductions in smoking (33% for gum, 37% for snus, and 42% for Zonnic), indicating that snus and Zonnic could be promising alternatives for nicotine replacement therapy, warranting further research on their long-term effectiveness.
Randomized crossover trial of the acceptability of snus, nicotine gum, and Zonnic therapy for smoking reduction in heavy smokers.Caldwell, B., Burgess, C., Crane, J.[2022]
ZYN nicotine pouches contain no nitrosamines or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), indicating a potentially lower risk profile compared to traditional tobacco products, which often contain harmful constituents.
The levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) in ZYN were found to be similar to those in nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products, suggesting that ZYN may be a safer alternative for nicotine delivery compared to moist snuff, which had significantly higher levels of harmful compounds.
Harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) in two novel nicotine pouch products in comparison with regular smokeless tobacco products and pharmaceutical nicotine replacement therapy products (NRTs).Back, S., Masser, AE., Rutqvist, LE., et al.[2023]
In a study of 371 participants, those who adhered to wearing the active nicotine patch for at least 20 of the first 21 days had over three times the odds of achieving smoking abstinence at 6 weeks compared to nonadherent users (53.2% vs 21.5%).
Adherence to the nicotine patch did not significantly affect the likelihood of experiencing adverse events, indicating that using the patch as directed is both effective and safe for improving smoking cessation outcomes.
Relationship between adherence to daily nicotine patch use and treatment efficacy: secondary analysis of a 10-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial simulating over-the-counter use in adult smokers.Shiffman, S., Sweeney, CT., Ferguson, SG., et al.[2022]

References

Randomized crossover trial of the acceptability of snus, nicotine gum, and Zonnic therapy for smoking reduction in heavy smokers. [2022]
Harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) in two novel nicotine pouch products in comparison with regular smokeless tobacco products and pharmaceutical nicotine replacement therapy products (NRTs). [2023]
Relationship between adherence to daily nicotine patch use and treatment efficacy: secondary analysis of a 10-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial simulating over-the-counter use in adult smokers. [2022]
A single-blind, randomized, crossover trial of the effects of a nicotine pouch on the relief of tobacco withdrawal symptoms and user satisfaction. [2015]
New Product Marketing Blurs the Line Between Nicotine Replacement Therapy and Smokeless Tobacco Products. [2019]
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of a Novel Non-tobacco-Based Nicotine Pouch (ZYN) With Conventional, Tobacco-Based Swedish Snus and American Moist Snuff. [2021]
Adolescent Use of Flavored Non-Tobacco Oral Nicotine Products. [2023]
Perceptions of oral nicotine pouches & their marketing among Ohio Appalachia smokers and smokeless tobacco users. [2023]
Assessment of biomarkers of exposure and potential harm, and physiological and subjective health measures in exclusive users of nicotine pouches and current, former and never smokers. [2023]
Nicotine delivery systems. [2015]
Use, marketing, and appeal of oral nicotine products among adolescents, young adults, and adults. [2023]
Perceptions of Oral Nicotine Pouches on Reddit: Observational Study. [2022]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security