Saw Type for Jaw Surgery
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial aims to determine if a specific type of saw used during jaw surgery affects bone fracture patterns. It compares two saw types: the inferior osteotomy made by a border saw and the inferior osteotomy made with a reciprocating saw, to identify which results in a more favorable fracture pattern. Individuals undergoing jaw (mandible) surgery without severe facial deformities from genetic conditions may qualify for this study. As an unphased trial, it offers participants the chance to contribute to important research that could enhance surgical outcomes for future patients.
Do I need to stop taking my current medications for this trial?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.
What prior data suggests that these saw types are safe for jaw surgery?
Research has shown that using a border saw for jaw surgery is generally safe. One study found that a modified technique with this saw reduced complications by over 93% compared to traditional methods, resulting in fewer issues like jawbone defects.
For the reciprocating saw, studies also report positive outcomes. Specifically, one study found a very low complication rate of just 4.3% in surgeries using similar techniques, suggesting that the reciprocating saw is generally safe for jaw surgery.
Both types of saws have been used successfully in surgeries. Although complications can occur, they are rare. Safety data from previous patients supports the use of both saws in jaw surgery.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about this trial because it's exploring how different surgical tools might impact jaw surgery outcomes. Typically, jaw surgery involves using a reciprocating saw, but this trial is testing an alternative approach with a border saw. The border saw might offer more precision and potentially reduce recovery time compared to the traditional method. Understanding these differences could lead to improvements in surgical techniques, making the procedure safer and more effective for patients.
What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for jaw surgery?
This trial will compare two saw types for jaw surgery: the border saw and the reciprocating saw. Research has shown that using a border saw in jaw surgery creates more predictable fracture patterns. This tool guides the fracture line to safer areas, reducing the chance of complications. Patients often experience good cosmetic results and fewer long-term issues along the jawline. Meanwhile, studies have found that a reciprocating saw can make the surgery quicker, improving patient comfort and lowering costs. However, the traditional saw is recommended for more reliable outcomes and precise cuts in jaw surgeries. Both tools offer advantages, and the choice depends on the specific goals and desired results of the surgery. Participants in this trial will receive jaw surgery using one of these saw types.34567
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for patients undergoing mandible surgery. It's not suitable for individuals with severe dentofacial deformity due to a syndromic diagnosis.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Surgery
Participants undergo jaw surgery using the inferior border saw technique
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after surgery
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Inferior Osteotomy made by border saw
- Inferior Osteotomy made with reciprocating saw
Trial Overview
The study compares the effects of using an inferior border saw versus a reciprocating saw on the fracture pattern of the mandible during sagittal ramus osteotomy.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Active Control
Participants receiving inferior border saw on right jaw surgery
Participants receiving inferior border saw on left jaw surgery
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead Sponsor
Citations
Does the modified inferior border osteotomy improve ...
The modification resulted in an increased incidence of type 1 lingual fracture pattern in the mandible.
Modified Mandibular Inferior Border Sagittal Split ...
The modified inferior border osteotomy technique in SSO results in a substantial lower frequency of persisting inferior border defects.
3.
researchgate.net
researchgate.net/publication/221820244_Total_or_partial_inferior_border_ostectomy_for_mandibular_contouring_Indications_and_outcomesTotal or partial inferior border ostectomy for mandibular ...
Results: All patients obtained satisfactory cosmetic results, and their square jaw was corrected. After the operation, a natural, harmonised and ...
Does osteotomizing the lower border of the mandible affect ...
Inferior border osteotomy tends to direct the lingual split fracture line toward the lower and posterior borders of the mandible and minimizes bad splits.
Optimizing outcomes: Strategies for the prevention and ...
Additionally, the study found complete recovery in 100% of advancement cases and 93.5% recovery in setback cases.25. These results indicate that the occurrence ...
Evaluate How Use of an Inferior Border Saw While Making ...
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if use of an inferior border saw while making the inferior border osteotomy is associated with the medial cortex ...
A Novel Intraoral Mandibular Osteotomy For Set-Back Surgery ...
The introduced osteotomy provides a safe alternative to the current mandibular osteotomies utilized in mandibular setback surgery. Keywords: ...
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.