Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Type 2 Diabetes

(REMIT2D isCGM Trial)

Not yet recruiting at 5 trial locations
RA
MD
Overseen ByManager, Data Science
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.
Must be taking: Non-insulin antihyperglycemics
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to determine if a continuous glucose monitor (a device that tracks sugar levels in real-time) can help people with type 2 diabetes achieve remission (return to normal or near-normal sugar levels) when combined with a low-calorie meal plan and diabetes education. The study compares this method to traditional finger-prick blood sugar tests (capillary blood glucose monitoring). Individuals who have had type 2 diabetes for more than 6 months but less than 6 years, are on no more than three diabetes medications (excluding insulin), and are willing to follow a low-calorie meal plan might be suitable candidates. As an unphased trial, this study provides a unique opportunity to explore innovative diabetes management strategies.

Do I have to stop taking my current medications for the trial?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop your current medications, but it mentions that participants should not be using insulin and should be treated with 3 or fewer non-insulin diabetes medications. It's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial team.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) is generally safe for people with type 2 diabetes. Studies have found that isCGM helps lower HbA1c levels, improving blood sugar control. Users report it is easy to use, with no major safety issues.

For those taking insulin or other diabetes medications, isCGM has proven effective and safe. People using this technology often feel more satisfied compared to traditional methods, suggesting that isCGM is a reliable way to manage diabetes without major side effects.

Overall, evidence supports that isCGM is safe and can be an effective part of diabetes management.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about this trial because it explores different ways to manage Type 2 Diabetes by comparing traditional and newer monitoring methods. The trial looks at capillary blood glucose monitoring, which is a common standard where patients prick their finger to check blood sugar levels, versus an intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitor (isCGM). The isCGM provides more real-time data without the need for constant finger pricking, potentially offering patients a more convenient and comfortable way to track their glucose levels. Additionally, both groups receive a low-calorie meal replacement plan and diabetes self-management education, which could enhance overall diabetes control and quality of life. This trial seeks to find out if these combined approaches can improve diabetes management more effectively than current methods.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for type 2 diabetes?

In this trial, participants will be divided into two groups to evaluate different glucose monitoring strategies. Research has shown that intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM), one of the strategies tested in this trial, can help people with type 2 diabetes manage their blood sugar more effectively. Studies have found that isCGM can lower HbA1c levels, an important measure of long-term blood sugar control. This benefit occurs in patients regardless of insulin use. Additionally, isCGM provides real-time information about glucose levels, aiding patients in making healthier lifestyle choices. Overall, using isCGM alongside lifestyle changes can lead to better diabetes management.34678

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults with type 2 diabetes who are starting a low-calorie meal replacement and diabetes self-management education. Participants should not be using any antihyperglycemic agents for at least three months prior to the study.

Inclusion Criteria

I am between 18 and 75 years old.
BMI 27-44.9 kg/m2
Not currently using a real-time CGM or isCGM
See 4 more

Exclusion Criteria

Uncontrolled mental health disorder
Are pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant in the next 2 years
Active binge eating disorder or other eating disorder
See 7 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Total Dietary Replacement

Participants undergo total dietary replacement as part of the intervention

12-24 weeks

Food Re-introduction

Participants gradually reintroduce food while continuing diabetes self-management education

18-30 weeks

Remission

Participants are monitored for remission of type 2 diabetes

30-44 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Capillary blood glucose monitoring
  • Diabetes self management education
  • Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring
  • Low calorie meal replacement plan
Trial Overview The study compares two monitoring methods: intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) versus traditional capillary blood glucose testing, alongside a low-calorie diet and education program. The goal is to see which method leads to higher rates of type 2 diabetes remission over an 18-30 week period.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: isCGM + LCMR + DSMEExperimental Treatment3 Interventions
Group II: CBG + LCMR + DSMEActive Control3 Interventions

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

LMC Diabetes & Endocrinology Ltd.

Lead Sponsor

Trials
19
Recruited
23,300+

Abbott Diabetes Care

Industry Sponsor

Trials
67
Recruited
25,600+

Robert B. Ford

Abbott Diabetes Care

Chief Executive Officer since 2020

Bachelor's degree from Boston College, MBA from UC Berkeley, Haas School of Business

Dr. Mahmood Kazemi

Abbott Diabetes Care

Chief Medical Officer

Bachelor's and Master's degrees from Stanford University, MD from the University of California, San Francisco

Citations

Efficacy of intermittently scanned continuous glucose ...The outcomes considered in this review included glycemic control, measured by HbA1c (%) and assessed ≥ 12 weeks postintervention; time below ...
Effects of Patient-Driven Lifestyle Modification Using ...Patient-driven lifestyle modification primarily focused on eating behavior using isCGM effectively lowered HbA 1c levels in patients with T2D.
Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring ...Intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring provides no benefit over structured self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes not on prandial ...
Effectiveness and Safety of the Intermittently Scanned ...isCGM proved to be effective and safe in improving glycaemic control in patients with T2DM on basal insulin or non-insulin therapy.
Study Details | NCT05319496 | isCGM With Education and ...Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to reduce hypoglycemia in adults on insulin. The effectiveness of CGM in adults with type 2 ...
6.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38117991/
Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and ...Both CGM and isCGM demonstrated a reduction in HbA1c levels in individuals with T2D, and unlike CGM, isCGM use was associated with improved user ...
Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and ...Both CGM and isCGM demonstrated a reduction in HbA 1c levels in individuals with T2D, and unlike CGM, isCGM use was associated with improved user satisfaction.
Intermittently Scanned and Real-Time Continuous Glucose ...Evidence from some studies suggested there was a significant benefit favouring rtCGM versus isCGM for these outcomes, whereas other studies found no significant ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security