330 Participants Needed

SAFE Intervention + Telephone Navigation for Suicide Prevention

(IAMSAFE Trial)

Recruiting at 3 trial locations
DK
JA
Overseen ByJacky Au, BSc
Age: < 18
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: The Hospital for Sick Children
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

Suicide is the leading cause of death due to illness among Canadian youth, claiming more lives than any medical illness, including cancer. Suicide prevention is possible, and early intervention is needed. The investigators will examine the effectiveness of a previously-piloted, ED-based suicide prevention intervention, across Canadian sites, using a randomized clinical trial design. The investigators will determine whether the patient- and family-centered intervention is more effective than enhanced usual care in reducing suicide-related behaviors in 330 youth at high-risk of suicide.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the SAFE Intervention + Telephone Navigation for Suicide Prevention treatment?

Research shows that telephone-delivered interventions and safety planning can help reduce suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Studies indicate that these approaches can decrease feelings of depression and hopelessness, and improve treatment engagement, making them promising components for suicide prevention.12345

Is the SAFE Intervention + Telephone Navigation generally safe for humans?

The research articles do not provide specific safety data for the SAFE Intervention + Telephone Navigation, but they do not report any safety concerns or adverse effects related to the intervention in the studies mentioned.56789

How is the SAFE Intervention + Telephone Navigation treatment unique for suicide prevention?

The SAFE Intervention + Telephone Navigation treatment is unique because it combines a safety planning intervention (SPI) with telephone follow-up, providing ongoing support and monitoring for individuals at risk of suicide. This approach is flexible, allowing for both in-person and remote delivery, and is designed to improve treatment engagement and reduce hospitalizations.47101112

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for Canadian youth at high risk of suicide who have shown suicidal behavior or thoughts, attempted suicide, self-harm, or are in an emergency situation due to these issues. Specific eligibility details were not provided.

Inclusion Criteria

I am between 12 and 17 years old.
Living in the catchment area of one of the three hospital sites and access to a telephone
Youth presenting in the Emergency Department with SIQ-Jr score ≥ 31
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

Moderate to severe intellectual disability, and/or autism based on clinical chart
Score of 3 on KSADS screen for current psychosis or elevated mood

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive the SAFE + UC intervention or NAV + UC intervention for 6 weeks

6 weeks
Up to 6 weekly visits (telephone or in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

24 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • NAV
  • SAFE Intervention
Trial OverviewThe study tests a patient- and family-centered intervention called SAFE Intervention against enhanced usual care. It also includes NAV (Telephone Navigation) support. The goal is to see if these approaches reduce suicide-related behaviors more effectively.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: SAFE InterventionExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
This group will receive the SAFE individual youth and family-based intervention.
Group II: NAV (Telephone Navigation)Active Control1 Intervention
This group will receive telephone-based case navigation.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

The Hospital for Sick Children

Lead Sponsor

Trials
724
Recruited
6,969,000+

SickKids Foundation

Collaborator

Trials
10
Recruited
2,200+

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Collaborator

Trials
1,417
Recruited
26,550,000+

Findings from Research

A systematic review of five studies found that telephone-delivered interventions for individuals who attempted suicide did not significantly reduce the likelihood of further suicide attempts or completed suicides.
The use of crisis cards for patients who engaged in deliberate self-harm also showed no significant impact on reducing further self-harm incidents, suggesting that these telephone-based strategies may not be effective alternatives to in-person therapy.
Effectiveness of Telephone-Delivered Interventions Following Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review.Noh, D., Park, YS., Oh, EG.[2018]
The pilot study involving 66 adolescents showed that the ASAP intervention, which includes a smartphone app for emotion regulation, did not significantly reduce suicide attempts post-discharge, but indicated a trend towards fewer attempts (16% vs. 31%).
Participants with a history of previous suicide attempts may benefit more from the ASAP intervention, suggesting that this program could be tailored for those at higher risk, and overall, the intervention and app were well-received by users.
As Safe as Possible (ASAP): A Brief App-Supported Inpatient Intervention to Prevent Postdischarge Suicidal Behavior in Hospitalized, Suicidal Adolescents.Kennard, BD., Goldstein, T., Foxwell, AA., et al.[2023]
The implementation of Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training (ASIST) in crisis hotlines led to significant improvements in callers' feelings of depression, suicidal thoughts, and overall hopefulness, based on data from 1,507 monitored calls.
While ASIST training did not result in more thorough suicide risk assessments, it was associated with effective counselor interventions that helped callers explore reasons for living and connect with informal support, contributing to better outcomes.
Impact of Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training on the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.Gould, MS., Cross, W., Pisani, AR., et al.[2022]

References

Effectiveness of Telephone-Delivered Interventions Following Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review. [2018]
As Safe as Possible (ASAP): A Brief App-Supported Inpatient Intervention to Prevent Postdischarge Suicidal Behavior in Hospitalized, Suicidal Adolescents. [2023]
Impact of Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training on the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. [2022]
The Effectiveness of the Safety Planning Intervention for Adults Experiencing Suicide-Related Distress: A Systematic Review. [2022]
Helping callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline who are at imminent risk of suicide: the importance of active engagement, active rescue, and collaboration between crisis and emergency services. [2022]
The effectiveness of post-discharge navigation added to an inpatient addiction consultation for patients with substance use disorder; a randomized controlled trial. [2022]
An Emergency Department Intervention and Follow-Up to Reduce Suicide Risk in the VA: Acceptability and Effectiveness. [2022]
Helping Callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline Who Are at Imminent Risk of Suicide: Evaluation of Caller Risk Profiles and Interventions Implemented. [2022]
Navigation Services to Avoid Rehospitalization among Medical/Surgical Patients with Comorbid Substance Use Disorder: Rationale and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial. [2022]
Comparing models of helper behavior to actual practice in telephone crisis intervention: a Silent Monitoring Study of Calls to the U.S. 1-800-SUICIDE Network. [2007]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Suicide: issues of prevention, intervention, and facilitation. [2022]
Suicide first aid. [2022]