65 Participants Needed

Enema Flush Regimen for Constipation

Recruiting at 1 trial location
EA
AK
Overseen ByAnn Klipsch, RN
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This study will evaluate changes in the fecal microbiome in constipated pediatric patients before and after antegrade continence enema placement and initiation of antegrade enema flushes. Subjects will have their microbiome sequenced prior to placement by obtaining a fecal sample. Pre-antegrade continence enema placement results will be compared to fecal samples obtained at 0, 4, 8 months after placement of the antegrade continence enema and initiation of miralax or golytely flushes to look for changes in bacterial diversity.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but you cannot have used probiotic supplements, prebiotic supplements, or antibiotics in the month before joining.

What evidence supports the effectiveness of the drug for treating constipation?

Research shows that polyethylene glycol 3350 (MiraLAX) is effective for short-term treatment of occasional constipation and has been studied for chronic constipation, demonstrating safety and efficacy over a 6-month period.12345

Is the enema flush regimen using polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 safe for humans?

Polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG 3350), used in products like MiraLAX and GoLYTELY, is generally considered safe for short-term use in treating constipation, with common side effects being nausea and abdominal cramps. However, there are rare cases of severe complications, such as electrolyte imbalances, especially if not prepared correctly, as seen in a pediatric case.12345

How does the enema flush regimen for constipation differ from other treatments?

The enema flush regimen is unique because it involves directly introducing a liquid into the rectum to relieve constipation, which is different from oral treatments like polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 that are taken by mouth. This method can provide more immediate relief compared to oral laxatives that need time to work through the digestive system.12467

Research Team

KH

Kate Hawa, DO

Principal Investigator

Riley Hospital for Children

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for pediatric patients with severe, treatment-resistant constipation who will undergo a procedure called antegrade continence enema at Riley Hospital for Children. They should have normal colonic movement and not have had any GI surgery or used probiotics, prebiotics, or antibiotics in the last month.

Inclusion Criteria

I need a special procedure for my severe constipation not responding to other treatments.
My bowel movements are normal according to tests.

Exclusion Criteria

I have a severe stomach or intestine disease not caused by my chronic constipation.
I have used probiotics, prebiotics, or antibiotics in the last month.
I have a physical reason for my constipation.
See 1 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Pre-MACE Placement

Participants provide a stool sample before MACE placement while abstaining from osmotic laxative therapy for one week

1 week
1 visit (in-person)

Post-MACE Treatment

Participants undergo MACE placement and initiate daily antegrade enema flushes with PEG 3350 or PEG 3350 with electrolytes

8 months
Standard follow-up appointments at 1, 4, and 8 months

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in fecal microbiome diversity after treatment

8 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Glycerin
  • PEG 3350
  • PEG-3350 with electrolytes
Trial OverviewThe study looks at how the fecal microbiome (the community of bacteria in poop) changes after kids start using bowel flushes with PEG 3350 or Golytely following an antegrade continence enema placement. Their poop is tested before and then several times up to 8 months after starting treatment.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: PEG 3350 with electrolytesExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Patients will receive PEG 3350 with electrolytes (Go-Lytely or generic equivalent) for their MACE flushes.
Group II: PEG 3350Experimental Treatment2 Interventions
Patients will receive PEG 3350 (miralax or generic equivalent) for their MACE flushes.

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Indiana University

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1,063
Recruited
1,182,000+

Findings from Research

In a study involving 311 patients, including 117 elderly individuals, polyethylene glycol 3350 (MiraLAX) was found to be safe and effective for treating chronic constipation over a 12-month period, with 80-88% of patients reporting successful treatment outcomes.
The treatment was associated with mild to moderate gastrointestinal side effects, such as diarrhea and nausea, but there were no significant changes in blood chemistry or hematology, indicating a favorable safety profile for long-term use.
An open-label study of chronic polyethylene glycol laxative use in chronic constipation.Di Palma, JA., Cleveland, MV., McGowan, J., et al.[2018]
Polyethylene glycol 3350 (MiraLAX) is an effective and safe osmotic laxative for treating chronic constipation in both children and adults, supported by 21 clinical studies involving 1949 patients.
The American College of Gastroenterology has given polyethylene glycol 3350 a grade A recommendation for its ability to improve stool frequency and consistency, indicating strong clinical support for its use.
Over-the-counter laxative polyethylene glycol 3350: an evidence-based appraisal.Zurad, EG., Johanson, JF.[2019]
In a study involving 403 patients, the standard bowel preparation regimen GoLytely was found to be significantly more effective for bowel cleansing compared to MiraLAX alone or when combined with bisacodyl or lubiprostone, as measured by the Ottawa bowel preparation scale.
Despite being less effective, patients who used MiraLAX reported higher satisfaction with their preparation experience compared to those who used GoLytely, indicating a trade-off between efficacy and patient comfort.
MiraLAX is not as effective as GoLytely in bowel cleansing before screening colonoscopies.Hjelkrem, M., Stengel, J., Liu, M., et al.[2018]

References

An open-label study of chronic polyethylene glycol laxative use in chronic constipation. [2018]
Over-the-counter laxative polyethylene glycol 3350: an evidence-based appraisal. [2019]
MiraLAX is not as effective as GoLytely in bowel cleansing before screening colonoscopies. [2018]
A randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of polyethylene glycol laxative for chronic treatment of chronic constipation. [2022]
Lethal Complication From Inappropriately Prepared Polyethylene Glycol (Golytely) in a Pediatric Patient. [2021]
A randomized, multicenter comparison of polyethylene glycol laxative and tegaserod in treatment of patients with chronic constipation. [2018]
New polyethylene glycol laxative for treatment of constipation in adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. [2018]