312 Participants Needed

Antibiotic Beads vs Negative Pressure Therapy for Open Tibia Fracture

(BeadsvsVac Trial)

Recruiting at 27 trial locations
AL
HP
Overseen ByHeather Phipps, MPS
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 3
Sponsor: University of Maryland, Baltimore
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)This treatment is in the last trial phase before FDA approval
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests two treatment methods for severe open tibia fractures, where the bone pierces the skin. One method uses antibiotic beads in the wound to prevent infection, while the other uses a vacuum-sealed dressing to aid healing. The goal is to determine which treatment improves leg healing over six months. Suitable participants have a severe open tibia fracture requiring multiple surgeries to clean the wound. As a Phase 3 trial, this study represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants a chance to contribute to potentially groundbreaking treatment advancements.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Previous studies have shown that antibiotic cement bead pouches help prevent infections in open fractures. This treatment places small beads filled with antibiotics directly into the wound to combat bacteria. Research has found these beads effective in controlling infections, particularly in severe bone infections like chronic osteomyelitis, a long-lasting bone infection.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has also been studied and shown to reduce infection risk and speed up healing in open fractures. This method uses a vacuum to aid wound healing by removing fluid.

Both treatments have been tested and are considered safe for managing open fractures. Patients using antibiotic beads and NPWT have generally tolerated them well, with no significant increase in side effects reported.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about these treatments for open tibia fractures because they offer new ways to prevent infection and promote healing. The Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch delivers antibiotics directly to the wound site using handmade beads loaded with vancomycin and tobramycin, which can be tailored to the size of the wound. This method contrasts with standard systemic antibiotic treatments by concentrating the antibiotics right where they're needed most. On the other hand, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) uses a vacuum seal to remove excess fluid and shrink the wound, which helps in faster healing by maintaining an optimal wound environment. These innovative approaches could potentially improve recovery times and reduce complications compared to traditional methods.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for open tibia fractures?

This trial will compare the effectiveness of two treatments for open tibia fractures. Research has shown that antibiotic cement bead pouches, one of the treatments in this trial, can greatly lower the risk of infection and reduce the need for additional surgeries due to infections. Meanwhile, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), the other treatment option, helps wounds heal faster by removing fluid and keeping the wound closed. Studies also indicate that NPWT can lower infection rates and reduce the need for additional surgeries. Both treatments have shown promising results in treating severe open tibia fractures.23678

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults over 18 with severe open tibia fractures needing multiple cleanings and debridement surgeries. They must plan to have internal or external fixation, receive initial surgery within 72 hours of injury, and all procedures done by a participating surgeon.

Inclusion Criteria

I am scheduled for surgery to fix a bone fracture.
Informed consent obtained
My fracture surgery will be done by a participating surgeon.
See 2 more

Exclusion Criteria

I cannot use antibiotic beads due to health reasons.
My surgeon thinks saving my limb is unlikely to succeed for more than 6 months.
Incarceration
See 9 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either an antibiotic bead pouch or negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for open fracture wound management

6 weeks
Multiple visits for irrigation and debridement surgeries

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

6 months
Assessments at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch
  • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Trial Overview The study compares two treatments for managing temporary wounds in severe open tibia fractures: an antibiotic cement bead pouch versus negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Participants are randomly assigned to one of the treatments and followed up at several intervals post-surgery.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Antibiotic Cement Bead PouchExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)Active Control1 Intervention

Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch is already approved in European Union, United States for the following indications:

🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Antibiotic Bead Pouch for:
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Lead Sponsor

Trials
729
Recruited
540,000+

McMaster University

Collaborator

Trials
936
Recruited
2,630,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

Antibiotic bead pouches (ABPs) can deliver high concentrations of local antibiotics, potentially reducing infection rates in patients with open fractures, which is crucial for improving outcomes and lowering healthcare costs.
Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy enhances the success of surgical procedures for severe traumatic wounds, helping to minimize complications and improve healing when primary closure is not possible.
Wound management for severe open fractures: use of antibiotic bead pouches and vacuum-assisted closure.Prasarn, ML., Zych, G., Ostermann, PA.[2010]
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) did not reduce local antibiotic concentrations in wound drainage when used with antibiotic-impregnated PMMA beads in a study involving 20 anesthetized pigs.
However, when the fascia was left open, NPWT resulted in significantly lower total elution of vancomycin and tobramycin, suggesting that fascial closure may be important for optimizing antibiotic delivery in this treatment context.
Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on the elution of antibiotics from polymethylmethacrylate beads in a porcine simulated open femur fracture model.Large, TM., Douglas, G., Erickson, G., et al.[2016]
In a study of 60 children with acute hematogenous osteomyelitis, treatment with vancomycin-loaded calcium sulfate beads combined with negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) showed a similar success rate (75%) compared to conventional treatment (71.4%).
The vancomycin group experienced a significantly faster reduction in inflammatory markers (CRP levels) to 50% of initial levels in an average of 4.8 days, compared to 13 days in the conventional group, suggesting improved recovery and potentially reducing the need for prolonged antibiotic therapy.
Efficacy and safety of vancomycin-loaded calcium sulfate versus conventional surgical debridement for pediatric acute osteomyelitis: a retrospective study.Wang, B., Cheng, W., Liu, F., et al.[2023]

Citations

The antibiotic bead pouch – a useful technique for ...The antibiotic bead pouch technique is a reasonable surgical approach for managing temporary soft tissue defects following adequate surgical debridement.
Antibiotic bead pouch versus negative pressure wound ...Antibiotic bead pouch for initial coverage of type IIIB open tibial shaft fractures requiring flap coverage was associated with a lower risk of FRI requiring ...
Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch Versus Negative Pressure ...The Beads vs Vac trial is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial of 312 participants with a severe open tibia fracture requiring multiple ...
Antibiotic Cement Bead Pouch Versus Negative Pressure ...The primary objective of this trial is to determine if the antibiotic bead pouch, compared to NPWT application, is more effective at reducing ...
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Antibiotic Cement ...Emerging comparative studies suggest that the antibiotic bead pouch may significantly reduce the risk of open fracture infection and its related ...
Basic science and current management for fracture ...Antibiotic bead pouches have been demonstrated to outperform negative pressure wound therapy in the management of severe open fractures.
Outcome analysis of antibiotic-loaded poly methyl ...Antibiotics containing PMMA beads are effective in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis and in preventing the recurrence of infection.
The Production of Antibiotic Cement BeadsAntibiotic beads have demonstrated decreased rates of infection in open fractures. 1 Other indications include severe soft tissue infections and bone defects ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security