125 Participants Needed
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center logo

Venetoclax + Azacitidine for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Recruiting in Houston (>99 mi)
BO
Overseen ByBetul Oran
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Sponsor: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This phase II trial studies how well venetoclax and azacitidine work for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia after stem cell transplantation. Venetoclax may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking BCL-2, a protein needed for cancer cell survival. Chemotherapy drugs, such as azacitidine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving venetoclax and azacitidine after a stem cell transplant may help control high risk leukemia and prevent it from coming back after the transplant.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial protocol does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. However, it mentions that participants should not have uncontrolled infections or be on certain immune suppressive drugs, so it's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial team.

Is the combination of Venetoclax and Azacitidine safe for treating acute myeloid leukemia?

The combination of Venetoclax and Azacitidine has been studied for safety in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, showing common blood-related side effects. These studies indicate that while the treatment can be effective, it often comes with hematologic toxicities (blood-related side effects), which are important to monitor.12345

What makes the drug combination of Venetoclax and Azacitidine unique for treating acute myeloid leukemia?

The combination of Venetoclax and Azacitidine is unique because it is specifically used for older patients or those who cannot undergo intensive chemotherapy, and it has been shown to improve survival rates compared to Azacitidine alone.23467

Research Team

Betul Oran | MD Anderson Cancer Center

Betul Oran, MD

Principal Investigator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for patients with acute myeloid leukemia who are in remission after a stem cell transplant but have high-risk features like minimal residual disease. They should be within 42 to 100 days post-transplant, have good organ function, and no active graft-versus-host disease or other serious conditions.

Inclusion Criteria

I understand the study's risks and benefits and can consent.
My kidney function is within the required range.
My AML is classified as high-risk based on specific genetic features.
See 20 more

Exclusion Criteria

I have been cancer-free for over a year, except for leukemia.
I have been diagnosed with a type of skin cancer.
I have uncontrolled graft-versus-host disease.
See 11 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive venetoclax and azacitidine for maintenance or minimal residual disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Treatment repeats every 4-8 weeks for up to 12 cycles.

48-96 weeks
12 cycles of treatment

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including incidence of severe infections and other adverse events.

8 weeks
Follow-up visits up to 60 days after last V+V dose

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Azacitidine
  • Venetoclax
Trial OverviewThe effectiveness of venetoclax combined with azacitidine is being tested as a treatment to prevent the return of acute myeloid leukemia after stem cell transplantation. Venetoclax targets proteins that cancer cells need to survive, while azacitidine interferes with their growth.
Participant Groups
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Treatment (azacitidine, venetoclax)Experimental Treatment2 Interventions
Patients receiving venetoclax and azacitidine for maintenance after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, receive azacitidine SC on days 1-5 and venetoclax PO QD on days 1-7. Patients receiving venetoclax and azacitidine for minimal residual disease after allogeneic stem cell transplant, receive azacitidine SC on days 1-5 and venetoclax PO QD on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 4-8 weeks for up to 12 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Azacitidine is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada, Japan for the following indications:

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί
Approved in European Union as Vidaza for:
  • Acute myeloid leukemia
  • Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
  • Myelodysplastic syndromes
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Approved in United States as Vidaza for:
  • Myelodysplastic syndromes
  • Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
Approved in Canada as Vidaza for:
  • Myelodysplastic syndromes
  • Acute myeloid leukemia
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Approved in Japan as Vidaza for:
  • Myelodysplastic syndromes
  • Acute myeloid leukemia

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
3,107
Recruited
1,813,000+

Findings from Research

In a study of 57 elderly patients (average age 69.9 years) with acute myeloid leukemia, the combination of venetoclax and azacitidine (VEN + AZA) showed a high overall response rate of 87.5% and a complete remission (CR) rate of 68.8%, indicating strong efficacy in this population.
The treatment was associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 11.5 months, and achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (<0.1%) was more common with VEN + AZA compared to traditional chemotherapy, although older patients (β‰₯75 years) and those with higher ECOG scores faced more challenges in achieving MRD negativity.
Single-institution experience of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients.Yu, H., Wang, C., Lei, Y., et al.[2023]
In a Japanese subgroup of the phase 3 VIALE-A trial, venetoclax-azacitidine significantly improved overall survival rates compared to placebo-azacitidine, with 67% of patients alive at 12 months versus 46% in the placebo group.
The treatment also resulted in a high complete response (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate of 67%, while maintaining a safety profile similar to the global study, indicating it is a viable first-line treatment for Japanese patients with acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Venetoclax plus azacitidine in Japanese patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.Yamamoto, K., Shinagawa, A., DiNardo, CD., et al.[2023]
In a study of 13 patients with acute leukemia treated with venetoclax and azacitidine, 46% developed COVID-19, highlighting a significant risk associated with this treatment during the pandemic.
The study found that 33% of those who contracted COVID-19 died from the virus, indicating that COVID-19 can lead to severe outcomes in patients receiving AZA-VEN therapy.
SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients Treated with Azacitidine and Venetoclax for Acute Leukemia: A Report of a Case Series Treated in a Single Institution.Drozd-SokoΕ‚owska, J., MΔ…dry, K., Barankiewicz, J., et al.[2023]

References

Single-institution experience of venetoclax combined with azacitidine in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia patients. [2023]
Venetoclax plus azacitidine in Japanese patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. [2023]
SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Patients Treated with Azacitidine and Venetoclax for Acute Leukemia: A Report of a Case Series Treated in a Single Institution. [2023]
Venetoclax in combination with azacitidine in Japanese patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: phase 1 trial findings. [2021]
Venetoclax-based combinations for acute myeloid leukemia: optimizing their use in Latin-America. [2022]
Phase II Study of Venetoclax Added to Cladribine Plus Low-Dose Cytarabine Alternating With 5-Azacitidine in Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia. [2023]
TP53 or Not TP53: That Is the Question. [2023]