Your session is about to expire
← Back to Search
Fluorescence Imaging for Breast Cancer
Study Summary
This trial will help to determine if PD G 506 A can help surgeons to more effectively remove all cancerous tissue during breast conserving surgery, potentially reducing the need for additional surgeries.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
You may be eligible if you check “Yes” for the criteria belowTimeline
Treatment Details
Study Objectives
Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.Trial Design
Find a Location
Who is running the clinical trial?
Media Library
- Group 1: PD G 506 A + Fluorescence-Guided Resection Arm
- Group 2: Standard of Care Arm
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the conditions that Aminolevulinic Acid Hydrochloride is indicated for?
"Aminolevulinic Acid Hydrochloride is commonly used to improve the condition of the scalp. However, it can also be given as a treatment for face and squamous cell carcinoma."
Are there other precedent medical studies involving Aminolevulinic Acid Hydrochloride?
"Aminolevulinic Acid Hydrochloride was first studied in 2013 at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. So far, there have been a total of 18,291 completed trials. There are presently 20 live studies, with a large number being performed in Orlando, Florida."
Has the FDA issued a judgment on Aminolevulinic Acid Hydrochloride?
"There is some efficacy data and multiple rounds of safety data, so we have estimated the safety of Aminolevulinic Acid Hydrochloride to be a 3."
Are there still any unfilled participant positions in this experiment?
"According to the latest update on clinicaltrials.gov, this study is still enrolling patients. The trial was posted on April 27th, 2021 and was edited on August 29th, 2022. There are 370 total spots open for recruitment across 3 sites."
What primary endpoint is this research trying to establish?
"This study will last for 2 weeks and focus on the diagnostic performance of the intervention. Additionally, the study will measure secondary outcomes including the percentage of orientations where in vivo and ex vivo fluorescence assessments are discordant, the orientation-level diagnostic performance of PD G 506 A-induced fluorescence to determine the presence or absence of cancer in the surgical cavity as compared to margin histopathology, and the patient-level false positive rate."
Share this study with friends
Copy Link
Messenger