52 Participants Needed

Perampanel for Post-Cardiac Arrest Seizures

(PROSPER Trial)

KB
EA
Overseen ByEdilberto Amorim, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Sponsor: University of California, San Francisco
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial
Approved in 3 JurisdictionsThis treatment is already approved in other countries

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests whether perampanel can safely prevent seizures after a person's heart stops and restarts. Seizures often occur in cardiac arrest survivors and can cause further brain injury. Participants will receive either perampanel or a placebo to determine the treatment's effectiveness and safety. Suitable candidates have experienced a non-traumatic cardiac arrest outside the hospital, are in a coma upon arrival at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, and had their heartbeat return within 45 minutes. As a Phase 2 trial, this research measures the treatment's effectiveness in an initial, smaller group, allowing participants to contribute to important medical advancements.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

Is there any evidence suggesting that perampanel is likely to be safe for humans?

Research shows that perampanel is usually well-tolerated by patients. In earlier studies, perampanel was found to be safe and effective for treating seizures. For instance, one study found that people taking perampanel experienced fewer seizures compared to those taking a placebo, indicating its effectiveness without causing serious side effects.

Long-term users of perampanel have reported a significant drop in seizure activity. Another study found that many patients experienced a major reduction in seizures over several months. However, like any medication, some individuals might experience side effects, especially when adjusting doses.

It is important to note that this trial is in the early stages, so the researchers are still assessing the safety of perampanel specifically for seizures after cardiac arrest. However, past evidence suggests that perampanel is generally safe for controlling seizures.12345

Why do researchers think this study treatment might be promising?

Researchers are excited about Perampanel for treating post-cardiac arrest seizures because it offers a unique approach compared to standard treatments like benzodiazepines or anti-seizure medications such as phenytoin. Perampanel works by blocking AMPA receptors, which play a crucial role in transmitting excitatory signals in the brain, potentially reducing seizure activity more effectively. Additionally, the treatment regimen is short, with an initial oral load followed by a few days of daily doses, which could lead to quicker stabilization of patients. This new mechanism of action and the potential for rapid results make Perampanel a promising option for improving outcomes in patients experiencing seizures after cardiac arrest.

What evidence suggests that perampanel might be an effective treatment for post-cardiac arrest seizures?

Research has shown that perampanel can help reduce seizures. One study reported a 77% to 90% decrease in seizure frequency among participants over 9 months to 2 years. Another study found that 64.9% of patients experienced at least a 75% reduction in seizures after 180 days, with 36.8% becoming seizure-free. In this trial, participants will receive either perampanel or a placebo to evaluate its effectiveness in reducing post-cardiac arrest seizures. These findings suggest that perampanel could significantly lower the chance of seizures, potentially benefiting patients after a heart attack.12356

Who Is on the Research Team?

EA

Edilberto Amorim, MD

Principal Investigator

University of California, San Francisco

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for patients who have survived a cardiac arrest but are at risk of developing seizures due to brain injury. It's not specified who can't join, so it's important to consult with the study team for exclusion criteria.

Inclusion Criteria

I was revived from a cardiac arrest in under 45 minutes.
I experienced a sudden cardiac arrest outside of a hospital without any injury causing it.
I was not able to follow commands upon hospital admission.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

I have had a recent stroke or brain bleed.
My liver function tests are more than five times the normal limit.
Pregnancy
See 3 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

1-2 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive either perampanel or placebo for post-cardiac arrest status epilepticus prevention

5 days
Daily administration in ICU

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

7 days

Long-term follow-up

Neurological function assessed at 180 days post-treatment

180 days

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Perampanel
Trial Overview The trial is testing whether Perampanel can prevent seizures after cardiac arrest. It's a pilot study, meaning it’s in early stages, and participants will be randomly assigned to either receive Perampanel or a placebo without active medication.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Placebo Group
Group I: PerampanelActive Control1 Intervention
Group II: PlaceboPlacebo Group2 Interventions

Perampanel is already approved in European Union, United States for the following indications:

🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Fycompa for:
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Fycompa for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of California, San Francisco

Lead Sponsor

Trials
2,636
Recruited
19,080,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study of 113 patients with refractory focal-onset seizures, early add-on treatment with perampanel (PER) resulted in a 68.1% responder rate and a 26.5% seizure-free rate after 12 months, indicating its effectiveness as an adjunctive therapy.
The treatment was generally well-tolerated, with 30.1% of patients experiencing mild to moderate adverse events, primarily irritability and dizziness, suggesting a favorable safety profile for PER at a median dose of 6 mg/day.
Effectiveness and safety of perampanel as early add-on treatment in patients with epilepsy and focal seizures in the routine clinical practice: Spain prospective study (PERADON).Abril Jaramillo, J., Estévez María, JC., Girón Úbeda, JM., et al.[2021]
In a 52-week observational study involving 483 patients with refractory epilepsy, perampanel was found to have a safety profile consistent with previous clinical studies, with 62.3% of patients reporting at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), primarily mild to moderate in severity.
The most common clinically important TEAEs included dizziness (13.9%) and balance disorders (5.6%), with 31.7% of patients experiencing such events, indicating that while perampanel is effective, monitoring for these side effects is essential in real-world settings.
A post-approval observational study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of perampanel as an add-on therapy in adolescent, adult, and elderly patients with epilepsy.Maguire, M., Ben-Menachem, E., Patten, A., et al.[2022]
In a study of 77 patients with focal-onset seizures, perampanel (PER) as an early add-on therapy resulted in a 60% reduction in seizure frequency for over half of the participants after 12 months, with a retention rate of 79.2%.
PER was particularly effective for patients experiencing focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, achieving a 60% seizure-free rate, although 40.3% of patients reported mild adverse events, leading to a 15.6% discontinuation rate due to side effects.
Perampanel effectiveness and safety as early add-on treatment for focal-onset seizures: PEREAGAL study.Rodríguez-Osorio, X., Lema-Facal, T., Rubio-Nazábal, E., et al.[2022]

Citations

PeRampanel fOr Status ePilEpticus pRophylaxis Post-cardiac ...Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints include incidence of seizures and PCARSE, seizure frequency, time to seizure control, number of anti- ...
Long-term safety of perampanel and seizure outcomes in ...Median percentage reduction in frequency of secondarily generalized (SG) seizures ranged from 77% at 9 months (N = 422) to 90% at 2 years (N = 141). Among the ...
Perampanel as adjunctive therapy in drug resistant ...At 180 days, ≥75% seizure reduction was seen in 64.9% (37/57) of the patients and seizure freedom was achieved in 36.8% (21/57). Drowsiness, ataxia, and ...
Efficacy and safety of perampanel in patients with seizures ...After accounting for the titration of perampanel, median percent reduction in drop seizure frequency per 28 days during the Core Study ...
Eisai Presents Its Largest Real-World Study Of Anti-Epileptic ...Eisai Inc. presented data from PERMIT, a large real-world clinical study evaluating its antiepileptic drug (AED) FYCOMPA® (perampanel) CIII, including as ...
Pediatric Postmarketing Pharmacovigilance Review11 days after increasing the dose of perampanel from 2 to 4 mg daily for seizures. Medical history included traumatic brain injury at age 2 ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security