High-Dose vs Low-Dose Cisplatin with Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer

Not currently recruiting at 431 trial locations
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 2 & 3
Sponsor: NRG Oncology
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests two approaches to using cisplatin with radiation therapy for advanced head and neck cancer. Researchers aim to determine if weekly cisplatin administration manages side effects better than the three-week schedule while maintaining effectiveness in extending life. Cisplatin, a chemotherapy drug, kills or slows cancer cells, and radiation therapy uses high-energy rays to target tumors. Individuals with metastatic head and neck cancer who have not received prior chemotherapy for this cancer may qualify for the study. As a Phase 2, Phase 3 trial, it evaluates treatment effectiveness in an initial group and represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants a chance to contribute to potentially groundbreaking cancer treatment advancements.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss your specific medications with the trial team to understand any potential interactions with cisplatin and radiation therapy.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research has shown that both high-dose and low-dose cisplatin, when combined with radiation therapy, are generally well-tolerated by patients. Studies have found that the standard high-dose cisplatin, administered every three weeks, is effective but often causes significant side effects like hearing loss. In contrast, low-dose cisplatin given weekly usually results in less hearing damage, making it potentially easier on the ears.

A study comparing these two dosing schedules found no major differences in overall side effects, although low-dose cisplatin may lead to less severe hearing loss. However, side effects such as painful swelling, mouth sores (mucositis), and difficulty swallowing were more common with the high-dose schedule.

Overall, both dosing strategies appear safe, but each has its own set of side effects. This information can guide decisions based on individual tolerance and side effect preferences.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about these treatments because they explore different dosing schedules of cisplatin combined with radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Unlike most treatments that typically involve a standard dosing frequency, this trial compares a high-dose regimen given every three weeks against a more frequent, lower-dose weekly regimen. By investigating these two strategies, researchers aim to find out if adjusting the timing and dosage can improve effectiveness and reduce side effects, potentially offering a more personalized approach to treatment. This exploration could lead to better outcomes and quality of life for patients with head and neck cancer.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for head and neck cancer?

This trial will compare high-dose versus low-dose cisplatin combined with radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Research has shown that both weekly and every three-week cisplatin treatments, when combined with radiation therapy, are effective for this type of cancer. Participants in Arm I will receive radiation therapy with every three-week cisplatin, while those in Arm II will receive radiation therapy with weekly cisplatin. Studies indicate that both schedules offer similar survival rates and safety. One study found that survival outcomes are comparable, but the every three-week schedule tends to cause more severe side effects. For weekly cisplatin, completion rates can vary, but the overall survival rate is about 72%. Choosing between the two options may depend on how well a patient tolerates the treatment, as both aim to shrink or control the cancer effectively.678910

Who Is on the Research Team?

PM

Paul M Harari

Principal Investigator

NRG Oncology

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

Adults with advanced head and neck cancer, including oral, laryngeal, oropharyngeal cancers but not oral cavity or nasopharynx cancers. Participants must have measurable disease, no history of cisplatin treatment for the current cancer, no distant metastases, and organ function within certain limits. HIV-positive patients are eligible if well-controlled. Pregnant or nursing individuals are excluded.

Inclusion Criteria

- One of the following imaging studies is required within 60 days prior to registration:
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) =< 1.5 x institutional ULN (within 30 days prior to registration)
Total bilirubin =< 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) (within 30 days prior to registration) (not applicable to patients with known Gilbert's syndrome)
See 37 more

Exclusion Criteria

I have had chemotherapy for this cancer but not with cisplatin.
You have a serious health condition that is currently active.
I am not pregnant or nursing, or I am willing to stop nursing.
See 13 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants receive radiation therapy and cisplatin. In Arm I, cisplatin is administered every 3 weeks, and in Arm II, it is administered weekly.

7 weeks
5 visits per week for radiation therapy

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety, effectiveness, and toxicity after treatment, including assessments of overall survival and progression-free survival.

Up to 9 years

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Cisplatin
  • Radiation Therapy
Trial Overview The trial is comparing two dosing schedules of cisplatin chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy to treat locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: high-dose every three weeks versus low-dose weekly. The goal is to determine which regimen offers better outcomes.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Arm II (radiation therapy, weekly cisplatin)Experimental Treatment7 Interventions
Group II: ARM I (radiation therapy, every 3 week cisplatin)Active Control7 Interventions

Cisplatin is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada, Japan for the following indications:

🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Platinol for:
🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Platinol for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Platinol for:
🇯🇵
Approved in Japan as Platinol for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

NRG Oncology

Lead Sponsor

Trials
242
Recruited
105,000+

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Collaborator

Trials
14,080
Recruited
41,180,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

In a study of 53 patients with untreated head and neck cancer, weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m²) combined with radiotherapy resulted in a high 2-year overall survival rate of 93.7% and a local progression-free rate of 88.0%.
The weekly regimen was associated with manageable toxicity, with 96.2% of patients completing the full course of radiotherapy, suggesting that this approach may be safer and easier to monitor compared to the traditional high-dose three-weekly cisplatin regimen.
Concomitant weekly cisplatin and radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.Homma, A., Inamura, N., Oridate, N., et al.[2022]
In a study of 142 patients with high-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, postoperative radiotherapy combined with low-dose cisplatin (75 mg/m² every 3 weeks) resulted in a 5-year overall survival rate of 68%, indicating its efficacy as a treatment option.
While the treatment showed lower toxicity compared to higher doses of cisplatin, with 53% experiencing severe mucositis and 14% facing grade 3 hematologic toxicity, only 48% of patients completed all planned chemotherapy cycles, highlighting challenges in treatment adherence.
Postoperative reduced dose of cisplatin concomitant with radiation therapy in high- risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Franchin, G., Minatel, E., Politi, D., et al.[2013]
In a study involving 17 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, treatment with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) at a dose of 2.5 mg/kg resulted in one complete response and five partial responses, indicating its potential efficacy as a treatment.
The treatment was associated with only moderate toxicity, suggesting that CDDP may be a relatively safe option for patients with this type of cancer.
Cis-disamminedichloroplatinum (II) CDDP: single agent in the treatment of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Tranter, RM., Howell, A.[2019]

Citations

Comparison of Weekly and Triweekly Cisplatin Regimens ...Overall, both schedules appear to be equally effective and safe. Our findings indicate that the treatment plan should be based on the individual ...
Review Article Comparing efficacy and safety of weekly vs. ...Both weekly and triweekly cisplatin regimens show comparable survival outcomes and safety profiles in patients with head and neck cancers, except for short term ...
Cisplatin every three weeks versus ...High dose once every 3 weeks cisplatin (HDC; 100 mg/m 2 ) added to curative radiotherapy (RT) prolongs survival, but is associated with severe toxicities.
Six-year follow-up from the weekly-three-weekly study ...The estimated 5-year locoregional control rates were 48.2% and 55.2% in the once-a-week and once-every-3-weeks cisplatin arms respectively; absolute difference, ...
NCT05050162 | Comparing Cisplatin Every Three Weeks ...This phase II/III trial compares whether cisplatin given weekly with radiation therapy is better tolerated than cisplatin given every three weeks with ...
A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Aggregate DataThree‐weekly high‐dose cisplatin (100 mg/m2) is considered the standard systemic regimen given concurrently with postoperative or definitive radiotherapy in ...
A comparative study between cisplatin weekly versus every ...Thus, this study aimed at comparing high and low dose of cisplatin treatment concomitantly administered with radiation therapy regarding safety and efficacy in ...
Efficacy and safety of weekly versus triweekly cisplatin ...Cisplatin-based regimens have been established as the most effective, and a dose of 100 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks is the most common (Tang et al., 2018).
9.nrgoncology.orgnrgoncology.org/HN009
NRG-HN009: Cisplatin and Radiation for Advanced Head ...This study compares two schedules of the chemotherapy drug, cisplatin, given every three weeks versus every week with radiation for patients with this type of ...
Lower, more frequent cisplatin dosing minimizes hearing ...Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity is dose dependent, often more severe with higher cumulative doses, and can significantly impact quality of life ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security