35 Participants Needed

ACTM-838 for Cancer

Recruiting at 1 trial location
AT
AS
S'
Overseen ByShouryadeep 'Deep' Senior VP, Clinical Development, MD, PhD
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This is a first in human (FIH) 2-part study using ACTM-838 in patients with advanced solid tumors resistant to standard of care treatment. Part 1a will evaluate dose escalation and Part 1b will evaluate dose expansion.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment ACTM-838 for cancer?

The research suggests that improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) in cancer treatments are strongly linked to better overall survival, which could imply that ACTM-838 might be effective if it shows similar improvements in PFS or TTP.12345

What safety data exists for ACTM-838 or similar treatments?

The research mentions MK886, a similar treatment, which has low toxicity in animal studies, suggesting it might be safe for humans. However, Actinomycin D, another related treatment, has a known toxicity profile, especially affecting neurons, indicating potential safety concerns.678910

How is the treatment ACTM-838 different from other cancer treatments?

ACTM-838 is unique because it involves adoptive cell transfer (ACT) using CD8+ T-cells that are specifically stimulated with an anti-OX40 antibody, enhancing their ability to fight cancer by promoting long-term memory and persistence, which is not a feature of traditional chemotherapy or radiation treatments.1112131415

Research Team

SC

SVP, Clinical Development, MD, PhD

Principal Investigator

Actym Therapeutics, Inc.

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for adults with advanced solid tumors that no longer respond to standard treatments. Participants must be in good physical condition (ECOG 0-1), have a CD4 count over 500/mL, at least one tumor visible on CT or MRI scans that can be biopsied, and their blood, liver, and heart functions should meet specific medical standards.

Inclusion Criteria

I have an advanced cancer with no standard treatment options left.
I am fully active or can carry out light work.
I have a tumor that can be measured and biopsied, visible on CT or MRI scans.
See 2 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Dose Escalation

Part 1a evaluates the safety, tolerability, and activity of escalating doses of ACTM-838 to estimate the maximum tolerated dose and/or the optimum biological dose as a monotherapy

8-12 weeks

Dose Expansion

Part 1b further evaluates ACTM-838 in patients with advanced specific tumor types at the recommended dose determined in Part 1a

12-16 weeks

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment

4 weeks

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • ACTM-838
Trial Overview ACTM-838 is being tested in this study. The first part of the trial will find the right dose of ACTM-838. Once the dose is determined, more people will join the second part to see how well it works at that dose against various solid tumors.
Participant Groups
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: ACTM-838 MonotherapyExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Escalating doses of ACTM-838 in Part 1a followed by expansion in Part 1b at the recommended dose determined in Part 1a

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Actym Therapeutics, Inc.

Lead Sponsor

Trials
1
Recruited
40+

Findings from Research

In a review of 36 randomized trials involving 10,484 patients with advanced gastric cancer, progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) were found to strongly correlate with overall survival (OS), suggesting they could serve as reliable indicators of treatment effectiveness.
The study revealed a higher correlation for PFS compared to TTP, particularly in trials conducted outside Asia and those involving patients with measurable lesions, indicating that PFS may be a more effective endpoint for evaluating new chemotherapy agents in future trials.
Progression-free survival and time to progression as surrogate markers of overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer: analysis of 36 randomized trials.Shitara, K., Ikeda, J., Yokota, T., et al.[2021]
The IePRO model of care utilizes electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) data to actively monitor and manage symptoms in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors, aiming to improve quality of care and patient outcomes.
This model is currently being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial, demonstrating a structured workflow where triage nurses respond to patient-reported symptoms, facilitating timely interventions and enhancing collaboration among care teams.
Development of an eHealth-enhanced model of care for the monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.da Silva Lopes, AM., Colomer-Lahiguera, S., Darnac, C., et al.[2023]
Phase II trials traditionally rely on tumor shrinkage as a measure of effectiveness, but recent findings suggest that some targeted therapies may still provide survival benefits even with low response rates, highlighting the need for better evaluation methods.
The review discusses the exploration of alternative endpoints for phase II trials, such as progression-free survival and continuous tumor size measurement, which may help identify effective treatments without prematurely halting promising agents.
Alternate endpoints for screening phase II studies.Dhani, N., Tu, D., Sargent, DJ., et al.[2022]

References

Progression-free survival and time to progression as surrogate markers of overall survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer: analysis of 36 randomized trials. [2021]
Development of an eHealth-enhanced model of care for the monitoring and management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. [2023]
Alternate endpoints for screening phase II studies. [2022]
Translation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology Clinical Trials to Everyday Practice. [2023]
Analysis of a Remote Monitoring Program for Symptoms Among Adults With Cancer Receiving Antineoplastic Therapy. [2022]
Ingenuity network-assisted transcription profiling: Identification of a new pharmacologic mechanism for MK886. [2022]
Context-dependent activation of p53 target genes and induction of apoptosis by actinomycin D in aerodigestive tract cancers. [2023]
Actein enhances TRAIL effects on suppressing gastric cancer progression by activating p53/Caspase-3 signaling. [2018]
AKT mediates actinomycin D-induced p53 expression. [2021]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Survival and functional recovery of primary cortical neurons exposed to actinomycin D. [2022]
11.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
In vivo antitumor function of tumor antigen-specific CTLs generated in the presence of OX40 co-stimulation in vitro. [2018]
Adoptive CD8+ T cell therapy against cancer:Challenges and opportunities. [2020]
13.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Combination OX40 agonism/CTLA-4 blockade with HER2 vaccination reverses T-cell anergy and promotes survival in tumor-bearing mice. [2021]
14.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Trial Watch: Adoptive cell transfer for anticancer immunotherapy. [2021]
15.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
IL-15-induced lymphocytes as adjuvant cellular immunotherapy for gastric cancer. [2022]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of ServiceยทPrivacy PolicyยทCookiesยทSecurity