Naporafenib + Trametinib for Solid Tumors (SEACRAFT-1 Trial)
Recruiting in Palo Alto (17 mi)
+31 other locations
Age: Any Age
Sex: Any
Travel: May be covered
Time Reimbursement: Varies
Trial Phase: Phase 1
Recruiting
Sponsor: Erasca, Inc.
No Placebo Group
Breakthrough Therapy
Trial Summary
What is the purpose of this trial?This trial is testing two drugs, naporafenib and trametinib, to treat advanced cancers with a specific mutation (RAS Q61X). It targets patients whose cancers do not respond to standard treatments. The drugs work by blocking signals that cancer cells need to grow. Trametinib is used in treating various cancers.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial requires that you do not take medications that strongly affect certain liver enzymes (CYP3A, CYP2C8, CYP2C9) or have a narrow safety margin. It's best to discuss your current medications with the trial team to see if any need to be stopped.
What data supports the effectiveness of the drug combination Naporafenib and Trametinib for solid tumors?
Trametinib, when combined with other drugs like dabrafenib, has shown improved survival in patients with certain types of melanoma, suggesting its potential effectiveness in treating solid tumors. Additionally, naporafenib targets specific pathways in cancer cells, which may enhance its effectiveness when used with trametinib.
12345Is the combination of Naporafenib and Trametinib generally safe for humans?
The combination of dabrafenib and trametinib, similar to Naporafenib and Trametinib, is generally safe for humans, with most side effects being mild to moderate and manageable. Common side effects include fever, fatigue, nausea, and skin issues, but these often decrease over time with treatment.
26789What makes the drug combination of Naporafenib and Trametinib unique for treating solid tumors?
The combination of Naporafenib and Trametinib is unique because it targets specific pathways involved in cancer cell growth, potentially offering a new option for solid tumors where standard treatments may not exist. This combination leverages the MEK inhibitor Trametinib, which has shown effectiveness in other cancers like melanoma, to potentially enhance treatment outcomes.
2671011Eligibility Criteria
This trial is for patients aged 12 or older with advanced solid tumors containing a specific mutation (RAS Q61X). They must have at least one measurable tumor, be able to take oral medication, and not have standard treatment options available. Patients who've had certain prior treatments or suffer from conditions affecting drug absorption, heart function, or eye health are excluded.Participant Groups
The study tests the effectiveness and safety of combining two drugs: Naporafenib and Trametinib in treating solid tumors with RAS Q61X mutations. It also aims to understand how these drugs behave in the body when taken together by patients with this genetic alteration.
1Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Group I: Naporafenib + TrametinibExperimental Treatment2 Interventions
Naporafenib (ERAS-254) 200 mg twice daily (BID) Trametinib 1 mg once daily (QD)
Find A Clinic Near You
Research locations nearbySelect from list below to view details:
Sarah Cannon Research InstituteNashville, TN
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, TX
SCRI Oncology Partners (formerly Tennessee Oncology)Nashville, TN
Cross Cancer Institute- Alberta Health Services (AHS)Edmonton, Canada
More Trial Locations
Loading ...
Who is running the clinical trial?
Erasca, Inc.Lead Sponsor
References
First-in-human study of naporafenib (LXH254) with or without spartalizumab in adult patients with advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK signaling pathway alterations. [2023]We investigated naporafenib (LXH254), a pan-RAF kinase inhibitor, with or without spartalizumab, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring MAPK pathway alterations.
Dabrafenib and trametinib exposure-efficacy and tolerance in metastatic melanoma patients: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic real-life study. [2022]Label="PURPOSE">Dabrafenib plus trametinib combination has greatly improved survival in BRAFV600mut metastatic melanoma patients. However, data regarding the influence of pharmacokinetic markers in real-life patients are lacking. In this study, we aimed to explore dabrafenib and trametinib pharmacokinetic impact on progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR) or all grades treatment-related adverse events (ARAE) occurrence in routine care patients.
Phase I study of the MEK inhibitor trametinib in combination with the AKT inhibitor afuresertib in patients with solid tumors and multiple myeloma. [2015]To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose of MEK/AKT inhibitor combination of trametinib and afuresertib.
Overall Survival of Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic BRAF V600-Mutant Acral/Cutaneous Melanoma Administered Dabrafenib Plus Trametinib: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Multicenter, Single-Arm Phase IIa Trial. [2022]To examine the long-term survival outcome of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in Chinese patients with unresectable or metastatic acral/cutaneous melanoma with BRAF-V600 mutation and to explore potential predictors of effectiveness.
BRAF v600E-mutant cancers treated with vemurafenib alone or in combination with everolimus, sorafenib, or crizotinib or with paclitaxel and carboplatin (VEM-PLUS) study. [2023]Combined BRAF + MEK inhibition is FDA approved for BRAF V600E-mutant solid tumors except for colorectal cancer. However, beyond MAPK mediated resistance several other mechanisms of resistance such as activation of CRAF, ARAF, MET, P13K/AKT/mTOR pathway exist among other complex pathways. In the VEM-PLUS study, we performed a pooled analysis of four phase one studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of vemurafenib monotherapy and vemurafenib combined with targeted therapies (sorafenib, crizotinib, or everolimus) or carboplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced solid tumors harboring BRAF V600 mutations. When vemurafenib monotherapy was compared with the combination regimens, no significant differences in OS or PFS durations were noted, except for inferior OS in the vemurafenib and paclitaxel and carboplatin trial (P = 0.011; HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.22-4.7) and in crossover patients (P = 0.0025; HR, 2.089; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4). Patients naïve to prior BRAF inhibitors had statistically significantly improved OS at 12.6 months compared to 10.4 months in the BRAF therapy refractory group (P = 0.024; HR, 1.69; 95% CI 1.07-2.68). The median PFS was statistically significant between both groups, with 7 months in the BRAF therapy naïve group compared to 4.7 months in the BRAF therapy refractory group (P = 0.016; HR, 1.80; 95% CI 1.11-2.91). The confirmed ORR in the vemurafenib monotherapy trial (28%) was higher than that in the combination trials. Our findings suggest that, compared with vemurafenib monotherapy, combinations of vemurafenib with cytotoxic chemotherapy or with RAF- or mTOR-targeting agents do not significantly extend the OS or PFS of patients who have solid tumors with BRAF V600E mutations. Gaining a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of BRAF inhibitor resistance, balancing toxicity and efficacy with novel trial designs are warranted.
FDA Approval Summary: Dabrafenib and Trametinib for the Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers Harboring BRAF V600E Mutations. [2019]On June 22, 2017, the Food and Drug Administration expanded indications for dabrafenib and trametinib to include treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring BRAF V600E mutations. Approval was based on results from an international, multicenter, multicohort, noncomparative, open-label trial, study BRF113928, which sequentially enrolled 93 patients who had received previous systemic treatment for advanced NSCLC (Cohort B, n = 57) or were treatment-naïve (Cohort C, n = 36). All patients received dabrafenib 150 mg orally twice daily and trametinib 2 mg orally once daily. In Cohort B, overall response rate (ORR) was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49%-76%) with response durations ≥6 months in 64% of responders. In Cohort C, ORR was 61% (95% CI 44%-77%) with response durations ≥6 months in 59% of responders. Results were evaluated in the context of the Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique registry and a chart review of U.S. electronic health records at two academic sites, characterizing treatment outcomes data for patients with metastatic NSCLC with or without BRAF V600E mutations. The treatment effect of dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily was evaluated in 78 patients with previously treated BRAF mutant NSCLC, yielding an ORR of 27% (95% CI 18%-38%), establishing that dabrafenib alone is active, but that the addition of trametinib is necessary to achieve an ORR of >40%. The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) were pyrexia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dry skin, decreased appetite, edema, rash, chills, hemorrhage, cough, and dyspnea.
Dabrafenib plus Trametinib: a Review in Advanced Melanoma with a BRAF (V600) Mutation. [2022]The BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (Tafinlar(®)) and the MEK inhibitor trametinib (Mekinist(®)) are indicated, as monotherapy or in combination with each other, for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a BRAF (V600) mutation. This article reviews the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of combination treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib in this indication and summarizes relevant pharmacological data. Dabrafenib plus trametinib significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), improved objective response rates (ORRs) and preserved health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) to a greater extent than dabrafenib (in the double-blind COMBI-d study) and vemurafenib (in the open-label COMBI-v study) in two large, randomized, phase III studies in treatment-naïve patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF (V600E/K) mutation. Limited treatment benefit with the combination was also seen in patients who had progressed on prior BRAF inhibitor therapy, as indicated by ORRs of ≤ 15 % and stable disease in ≤ 50 % of patients in small phase I and II studies. Combination therapy did not increase overall toxicity relative to dabrafenib or vemurafenib monotherapy, with most adverse events (AEs) mild or moderate in severity and generally manageable. Fewer skin-related AEs (e.g. cutaneous malignancies, hyperkeratinosis and hand-foot syndrome) were reported with combination therapy than with dabrafenib or vemurafenib, probably because of reduced paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway. Thus, dabrafenib plus trametinib provides an important treatment option for patients with BRAF (V600) mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
Relative bioavailability of pediatric oral solution and tablet formulations of trametinib in adult patients with solid tumors. [2018]Trametinib (Mekinist®) is a selective inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) approved in the United States as a single agent and in combination with dabrafenib (Tafinlar®) for treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with a positive BRAF V600E/V600K mutation for which a pediatric oral solution formulation is being developed. This open-label, two-period, two-treatment, randomized, crossover study assessed the relative bioavailability of the trametinib pediatric oral solution compared to the tablet formulation after a single-dose administration to adult patients with solid tumors. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints derived from standard non-compartmental methods were AUC0-inf , AUC0-t , and Cmax . As expected, Cmax was higher and Tmax earlier for the pediatric oral solution compared to the tablet formulation. Administration of the trametinib pediatric oral solution resulted in a 12%, 10%, 18%, and 71% higher AUC0-inf , AUC0-last , AUC0-24 , and Cmax , respectively, as compared to the tablet formulation. Safety results were aligned with the known safety profile of trametinib. No serious or non-serious adverse events resulted in study drug withdrawal. Palatability of the pediatric oral solution was evaluated and found to be acceptable to most adult patients, but may differ in the pediatric population.
The safety and efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib for the treatment of melanoma. [2017]The introduction of BRAF and MEK inhibitors into clinical practice improved the prognosis of metastatic melanoma patients. The combination of BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib with MEK inhibitor trametinib has shown its superiority to single agent therapy and is characterized by a tolerable spectrum of adverse events which shows a decrease in incidence over time on treatment. Areas covered: The current scientific literature on safety and adverse events (AEs) related to BRAF and MEK-inhibition has been investigated with special focus on the large phase 3 studies (COMBI-v, COMBI-d and CoBRIM) as well as recent updates presented at oncology and melanoma meetings. Additionally, published case series/case reports were screened for information on AEs. Expert opinion: Even though almost every patient (98%) under combination therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib experiences at least one adverse event, these are generally mild to moderate, reversible and can be managed with dose reductions or interruptions. However, due to an increased life expectancy, there is a substantial need to prevent and treat also mild adverse events, as they play a central role for the quality of life of patients. Ongoing clinical trials will have to demonstrate the efficacy as well as safety of triple combination with anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 antibodies.
BRAF Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. [2022]RAF family proteins are serine-threonine kinases that play a central role in the MAPK pathway which is involved in embryogenesis, cell differentiation, cell proliferation and death. Deregulation of this pathway is found in up to 30% of all human cancers and BRAF mutations can be identified in 1.5-3.5% of NSCLC patients. Following the positive results obtained through the combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant melanoma, the same combination was prospectively assessed in BRAF-mutant NSCLC. In cohort B of the BRF113928 trial, 57 pretreated NSCLC patients were treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib: an ORR of 68.4%, a disease control rate of 80.7%, a median PFS of 10.2 months and a median OS of 18.2 months were observed. Similar results were reported in the first-line setting (cohort C), with an ORR of 63.9%, a DCR of 75% and a median PFS and OS of 10.2 and 17.3 months, respectively. The combination was well tolerated: the main adverse events were pyrexia (64%), nausea (56%), diarrhoea (56%), fatigue (36%), oedema (36%) and vomiting (33%). These positive results led to the approval of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib for the treatment of BRAF V600E metastatic NSCLC patients regardless of previous therapy. Ongoing research should better define the role of new generation RAF inhibitors for patients with acquired resistance, the activity of chemo-immunotherapy or the combination of TKIs with chemotherapy or with immunotherapy in patients with BRAF-mutated cancers.
Cardiac tamponade induced by dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy for melanoma: Case report. [2023]BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) are targeted therapy for proto-oncogene BRAF mutated metastatic unresectable melanoma. Compared to monotherapy, an increased cardiovascular toxicity is reported with the combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib. This case report documents Grade 4 cardiac treatment emergent adverse effect of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade induced by this combination therapy.