Condition
Suggested Conditions
- Anxiety
- Depression
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Weight Loss
- Heart Disease
- Cancer
- Asthma
Location
Search Clinical Trials
Conditions
Locations
Treatment Type
Trial Phase
Trial Status
Paid Participation
109 Low Back Pain Trials near Miami, FL
Power is an online platform that helps thousands of Low Back Pain patients discover FDA-reviewed trials every day. Every trial we feature meets safety and ethical standards, giving patients an easy way to discover promising new treatments in the research stage.
Learn More About PowerPhysical Therapy for Low Back Pain
Ft Sam Houston, Texas
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) a measure of the effectiveness of the descending pain pathway and therefore a measure of the body's ability to perform endogenous analgesia. In subjects with normal function of the descending pain pathway, the net-effect during CPM testing is anti-nociceptive, or inhibition of the ascending pain pathway. In those with impaired descending pain pathway function, the response to CPM testing is pro-nociceptive, indicating that the body is unable to inhibit the pain signal, or may even amplify it. There is literature that supports the presence of impaired CPM, and therefore impaired descending pain pathway function, in numerus chronic pain conditions, including low back pain. Impaired descending pain pathway function may be contributing to this chronic pain presentation. This study will give us information on whether a typical physical therapy plan of care is able to improve impaired CPM, and if CPM values are predictive of improvement in physical therapy.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 64
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Serious Spinal Pathology, Neurological Disease, Others
57 Participants Needed
Non-pharmacological Pain Management for Post-Spine Surgery Pain
San Antonio, Texas
This study will compare the effectiveness of two pain management pathways (standard vs. enriched) for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery in the Military Health System (MHS). Effectiveness will be based on post-surgery patient-centered outcomes and extent of opioid use. The study design is a 2-arm, parallel group, individual-randomized trial.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Infection, Fracture, Tumor, Trauma, Others
267 Participants Needed
Ketamine for Chronic Lower Back Pain and Depression
Ann Arbor, Michigan
This is a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of ketamine infusions followed by a brief behavioral intervention in Veterans with chronic low back pain and depression.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Psychotic Disorders, Uncontrolled Hypertension, Cardiac Condition, Others
44 Participants Needed
Self-Administered Acupressure for Chronic Back Pain
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Many Veterans experience chronic pain, with back pain the most commonly reported condition. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is moving from reliance on medications to an approach in which non-medication interventions, including complementary and integrative health treatments, are now a first line of care. Acupressure, a Traditional Chinese Medicine technique derived from acupuncture, is emerging as a potentially effective approach for treating several chronic pain conditions and could prove beneficial in helping Veterans manage their chronic low back pain.
This study will determine the effectiveness of self-administered acupressure to treat chronic low back pain. 300 Veterans will be invited to participate in the study. All participants will be asked to attend an introduction to acupressure class and complete a survey when they join the study and again at 6 weeks and 10 weeks. The survey measures assess important outcomes, such as how pain interferes with daily function, as well as other areas that can be affected by pain such as fatigue and sleep quality. After completing the first survey, half of the participants will receive a tablet computer with an app that shows them how to self-administer acupressure for low back pain and will be asked to do daily acupressure sessions for the next 6 weeks. The other half of the participants will receive the tablet computer with the app approximately 10 weeks after completing the final survey based assessment. The investigators anticipate that outcomes will be improved after 6 weeks of acupressure practice, and these improvements will persist for the following 4 weeks.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnant, Recent Back Surgery, Cognitive Impairment, Others
300 Participants Needed
Multimodal Treatments for Chronic Lower Back Pain
Ann Arbor, Michigan
This study is being completed to better understand who benefits from different chronic pain treatments and how these treatments work.
This study will include a four week run-in period for all cLBP participants. After completing the PainGuide (online or smart phone accessible website) run-in period, participants will be assessed using either the light or light plus deep phenotyping assessment battery and those who minimal or modest improvement in their pain (based on PGIC) will be randomized to one of four 8-week treatments (mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), physical therapy (PT) and exercise, acupressure self-management, or duloxetine).
In addition, participants will complete study visits including physical exams, complete surveys, provide samples (blood,saliva, etc.), wear an electronic wrist device at certain times, and have Magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) during the study.
Following one of the 4 treatments (8 weeks) if participants have a certain level of pain (that meets eligibility for more treatment) they will be then randomized to complete one of the 3 treatments that was not already assigned to them.
The study hypothesizes the following:
that this interventional response phenotyping can identify individuals with different underlying mechanisms for their pain who thus respond differentially to evidence-based interventions for chronic lower back pain (cLBP).
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Age:25 - 70
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
494 Participants Needed
Back Wrap for Lower Back Pain
Buffalo, New York
The goal of this counterbalanced cross-over study is to determine whether a recovery lumbar wrap effectively reduces lower back pain and improves outcomes related to physical function and quality of life in adults with LBP in adults 20-65 years old. This study will also explore whether improvements in other health metrics that are typically related to, or seen in, lower back pain research (i.e. stiffness, mobility, physical activity, validated clinical scoring methods, etc.) are improved with the use of the product.
The main question this study aims to answer is:
• Does the lumbar wrap effectively reduce low back pain symptoms and improve outcomes related to physical function and quality of life in adults with lower back pain.
Participants experiencing lower back pain will be asked to use the lower back wrap for at least 20-minutes per day for a 2-week period, counterbalanced with a 2-week period of no device use. Participants will fill out small daily surveys about their symptoms and complete a pre-, middle-, and post- survey and functional screening to determine efficacy of the device.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:20 - 65
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cancer, Infection, Trauma, Pregnancy, Others
150 Participants Needed
TENS for Chronic Lower Back Pain
West Hartford, Connecticut
Low back pain is a significant public health problem, is very prevalent, and is often characterized by the persistence of symptoms. Unfortunately, substantial improvements in people with chronic low back pain are rare, causing most people to live with the pain. People with chronic low back pain may have an exaggerated pain response to nociceptive input into tissues that may also cause symptoms distant from the site of the primary symptoms. Historically, these symptoms were thought to be related to pathoanatomic changes to the muscles, ligaments, or joints. However, the severity of these structural changes weakly correlates with the clinical presentation and, in most cases, is not directly related to diagnostic image findings. Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain, in general, show signs of local/central sensitization. The central sensitization may appear to be directly correlated with the intensity and duration of pain. Therefore, it is essential to reduce pain intensity and minimize the duration of pain to prevent this from happening.
Pain relief for chronic low back pain patients should be aimed at treatments that reduce central excitability and increase central inhibition. Research into chronic low back pain treatment has demonstrated strong evidence that different types of exercise decrease pain and improve quality of life. However, exercise itself may be painful, preventing a person from exercising. Thus, treatments aimed at decreasing pain will improve a person's ability to exercise and participate in activities of daily living.
One treatment aimed at reducing central excitability and increasing central inhibition is transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). TENS is a "non-pharmacological" treatment for pain that is inexpensive, safe, and easy to use. Prior studies show that TENS utilizes opioid receptors both spinally and supraspinally to inhibit nociceptive dorsal horn neurons, reduce excitatory neurotransmitter release, and reduce hyperalgesia. Thus, TENS may be particularly useful in people with chronic low back pain because it can activate descending inhibitory pathways (reduced in chronic low back pain patients) and inhibit central excitability (increased in chronic low back pain patients).
Previous studies that have investigated the effects of TENS on pain in low back pain patients have failed to use proper intensities of current, and the assessment of pain was not performed during the peak of the analgesic response. Previous studies show inadequate intensities do not reduce pain or increase pressure pain thresholds. Further, TENS typically does not affect resting pain, while changes in pressure pain thresholds and pain with movement are reduced. Thus, the current study proposes to assess the effects of TENS on measures of pain, function, and descending inhibition using the maximal tolerable intensity of TENS applied to a large area of the trunk.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 60
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Serious Spinal Disorders, Neurological Diseases, Severe Cardiorespiratory Disease, Pregnancy, Cancer, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Opioids
34 Participants Needed
ED Physical Therapy for Lower Back Pain
Chicago, Illinois
Emergency department (ED)-initiated physical therapy is a rapidly growing resource and represents a promising treatment approach to low back pain. This clinical trial will evaluate an innovative model of an emergency department "embedded" physical therapist to treat patients with chronic low back pain, with a focus on improving patient functioning and reducing opioid use.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Police Custody, Others
128 Participants Needed
ED Physical Therapy for Lower Back Pain
Chicago, Illinois
Emergency department (ED)-initiated physical therapy is a rapidly growing resource and represents a promising treatment approach to low back pain. This clinical trial will evaluate an innovative model of an emergency department "embedded" physical therapist to treat patients with acute low back pain, with a focus on improving patient functioning and reducing opioid use.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Chronic Low Back Pain, Others
360 Participants Needed
Treatments for Chronic Back Pain and Opioid Use Disorder
Chicago, Illinois
This study is designed to track brain functional changes in individuals with i) chronic back pain + opioid use (CBP+O) and individuals with ii) chronic back pain + opioid misuse disorder (CBP+mOUD) following a brief drug delay and re-exposure manipulation. Re-exposure could be placebo, the participant's own opioid dose, or a dopaminergic treatment (DA+NSAID). The participants will be also evaluated for changes in cognition, emotion, and motor abilities with opioid delay and re-exposure to placebo, opioid, or DA+NSAID.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Diabetes, Hypertension, Neurological Conditions, Others
Must Be Taking:Short Acting Opioids
60 Participants Needed
Emergency Department Physical Therapy for Lower Back Pain
Chicago, Illinois
This is a multi-site feasibility trial of an embedded emergency department (ED) physical therapy care model for low back pain at two EDs in the Northwestern Medicine and University of Utah Health systems. The study intervention (embedded ED physical therapy) is a reconceptualization of the traditional outpatient physical therapy care model in which we place a physical therapist directly in the ED to initiate timely care for patients with low back pain; we previously evaluated this intervention in a single center randomized trial. This multi-site feasibility trial will be comprised of 9 months of active intervention and 12 months of longitudinal data collection. The two sites will be parallel randomized 1:1 to receive either the embedded ED physical therapy condition (intervention, n=1) or usual care (control, n=1) via simple randomization. This trial focuses on feasibility outcomes - such as our ability to enroll participants, deliver the intervention with fidelity, and collect longitudinal patient-reported outcome data and electronic health record data - but a future multi-site full-scale trial will focus on the outcomes of pain-interference and opioid use.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Red Flag Symptoms, Police Custody, Pregnancy, Others
140 Participants Needed
Erector Spinae Plane Block for Back Pain
Chicago, Illinois
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if an erector spinae plane block (ESPB; a type of nerve block) works to reduce pain in adults presenting to the emergency department with low back pain. It will also learn if the ESPB reduces pain, disability, and return to work at 7 days. The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Does the ESPB reduce short-term pain in participants with low back pain?
2. Does the ESPB reduce longer-term pain, reduce disability, and improve return to work and activities in participants with low back pain?
Researchers will compare ESPB to a placebo (an injection that does not involve a nerve block) to see if ESPB works to treat low back pain.
Participants will:
Receive either the ESPB or a placebo injection in the emergency department Report their pain scores for up to 120 minutes Report their pain, disability, and return to work at 7 days
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Non-English/Spanish, Incarceration, Pregnancy, Allergies, Critical Illness, Others
62 Participants Needed
Ischemic Preconditioning for Osteoarthritis and Lower Back Pain
Chicago, Illinois
We are examining the use of restricted blood flow, through full occlusion, on a single thigh for 50 minutes (5 minutes on, 5 minutes off), completed every other day for 2 weeks to improve function in individuals with knee osteoarthritis and low back pain.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:50+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Knee/hip Replacements, Blood Clots, Heart Failure, Others
24 Participants Needed
Yoga + Neuromodulation for Chronic Low Back Pain
Chicago, Illinois
The objectives of this VA Merit application are to demonstrate efficacy of combined intermittent theta burst (iTBS) and yoga (iTBS+yoga) intervention on improving pain, function, analgesic use, self-efficacy, quality of life and well-being among Veterans with chronic low back pain (CLBP). This Merit project will directly benefit Veterans and VA Services by demonstrating efficacy of a new, non-medication treatment for Veterans with CLBP in need of non-opioid treatment options. Neuromodulation including iTBS is now offered at over 50 VA hospitals and yoga is among the complementary and integrative health programs being rolled out as a part of VAs Whole Health implementation efforts. Thus, should iTBS+yoga ultimately prove to be efficacious, VA facilities will be well-poised to offer this treatment. A novel, activity-based, non-medication treatment for Veterans with CLBP is of great need given the high prevalence of CLBP.
Pivotal Trial (Near Approval)
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 3
Age:22+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Epilepsy, Heart Disease, Stroke, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Psychostimulants, Anticholinergics, Tricyclics, Antipsychotics
213 Participants Needed
Physical Activity + Emotion Regulation for Lower Back Pain
Storrs Mansfield, Connecticut
This study will advance understanding on the mechanisms that mediate improved outcomes for chronic low back pain and provide specific directions for optimizing physical activity interventions for this population.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Back Surgery, Sciatica, Chronic Pain, Psychiatric Illness, Others
204 Participants Needed
Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Lower Back Pain
Hines, Illinois
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if adding Osteopathic Manipulative Therapy (OMT) to the usual medical care provided at the VA (usual VA care) improves treatment outcomes in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). OMT is a set of hands-on techniques a doctor uses to move a patient's muscles and joints which include stretching, gentle pressure, resistance and applying forces to specific areas of the body. This feasibility clinical trial aims to learn about the treatment effects (e.g., effect sizes) of adding OMT to the usual medical care provided at the VA (Usual VA Care) in individuals with LBP.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Serious Pathology, Neurological Diseases, Pregnancy, Others
48 Participants Needed
Chiropractic Care + Radial Pulse Therapy for Low Back Pain
Seneca Falls, New York
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the addition of radial pulse therapy to chiropractic care will help adult patients recover faster to an acute bout of low back pain. Radial pulse therapy is the application of acoustic waves that passes through the skin to tissues and cells in the body. The main questions that the clinical trial aims to answer are:
* Does the addition of radial pulse therapy to chiropractic care result in better or earlier reduction in pain intensity?
* Does the addition of radial pulse therapy to chiropractic care result in better or earlier improvement in physical function?
Researchers will compare radial pulse therapy plus chiropractic care to chiropractic care alone to see if patients with acute low back pain recover faster with the addition of radial pulse therapy.
Participants will:
* Visit the clinic once a week for 5 weeks
* Receive chiropractic care with or without the addition of radial pulse therapy to the low back and hip regions of the body
* Report their pain intensity and perform a physical function test at each clinic visit
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 40
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Open Wounds, Hypermobility, Chronic Pain, Others
Must Not Be Taking:NSAIDs, Corticosteroids
60 Participants Needed
Exercise Types for Low Back Pain
Hamilton, Ontario
Exercise therapy is the most recommended treatment for chronic low back pain. There is a wide range of exercises available and research studies have shown that no exercise is superior to another. The problem is that the effects of exercise in reducing pain and disability are small to moderate. Researchers and clinicians believe that different patients may best respond to different types of exercises. This means that if patients could be better matched to specific exercises, then the effects of exercise would be greater. A study conducted by the investigators of this study tested whether patient's characteristics could predict outcomes to two of the most common exercises for low back pain: motor control exercises or graded activity. The results showed that a simple questionnaire (Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire) could identify patients who responded best to either exercise. Patients with low clinical instability (measured by the questionnaire) responded best to graded activity. Patients with high clinical instability responded best to motor control exercises.These results were the first to show that better matching patients to specific exercises improves outcomes. Although these results have the potential to significantly improve the delivery of exercises for low back pain, validation of the results in a high-quality study with a large group of patients is a prerequisite to clinical implementation. The aim of this study is to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of graded activity to motor control exercises and identify groups of respondents to these exercises. The study will also include the evaluation the costs and benefits of these interventions and the potential impact of matched treatment to patients and the health care system. The results of this study has the potential to increase the effects of exercise in low back pain and consequently lead to better patient outcomes and decreased health related costs.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Nerve Root Compromise, Serious Pathology, Pregnancy, Surgery, Cognitive Impairment, Others
425 Participants Needed
TeleYoga for Lower Back Pain
Kansas City, Kansas
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a highly prevalent and debilitating condition, affecting 84% of the population over a lifetime1. CLBP is the leading cause of disability worldwide 2 and is a top condition for health care expenditure in the US3. Emerging evidence indicates that individuals with low back pain have altered neurophysiological processes within the central nervous system leading to high prevalence of anxiety and depression, and poor sleep quality4-7. Standard treatments often focus on the local source of pain; however, for many patients the persistence and severity of pain cannot be explained by peripheral pathology alone. Yoga is a promising mind-body integrative intervention, as it targets the psychological and neurophysiological aspects of pain. The efficacy of yoga practice for reducing pain8,9 and psychological distress10,11 has been shown by many systematic reviews and randomized control trials (RCTs)12-16. Additionally, mindfulness, meditation, and breathwork interventions produce meaningful improvements in pain17,18, anxiety19,20, depression21, and sleep quality22,23.
Evidence clearly indicates yoga is an effective intervention for management of chronic LBP9. However, the majority of prior RCTs have included in-person yoga sessions 24-26, which may be a barrier to many people. Recently, virtual delivery of interventions is gaining popularity. A few recent studies reported promising feasibility of tele-yoga in people with various chronic pain conditions e.g. Alzheimer's 27, dementia 28, and knee osteoarthritis 29. Only one recent RCT conducted tele-yoga intervention for people with CLBP and resulted in decreased pain 14, but is limited to quantitative measures only and did not compare yoga against active therapy. No study has assessed participants' perspective of virtual yoga intervention for chronic low back pain, which is important to determine feasibility of tele-yoga for CLBP management. The objectives of this study are two fold: 1) to investigate the acceptability of yoga intervention using a tele-yoga approach and 2) to compare the effectiveness of a tele-yoga intervention with a mindfulness focus (Y+M) to a tele-yoga intervention without a mindfulness focus (Y-M) in adults with CLBP.
Thirty participants27,30 with CLBP aged 30-8014 will be recruited and randomly assigned to Y+M or time-matched Y-M (physical movement without breathing and meditation) group. Each group will participate in video-guided live group sessions 2x a week for 4 weeks28,30.
Aim 1: To evaluate acceptability of tele-yoga intervention for CLBP. The investigators will assess acceptability via participants' overall satisfaction using 1) self-reported satisfaction ratings, the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)31 and 2) semi-structured qualitative interviews to capture participant feedback about their experience (e.g. barriers, facilitators, motivators, perceived effectiveness, self-efficacy). Hypothesis 1: Participants will have good acceptability to tele-yoga intervention.
Aim 2: To compare between-group changes in pain and function between tele-yoga with breath regulation, focused attention/meditation and tele-yoga without breath regulation, focused attention/meditation. Efficacy of tele-yoga on pain and function between groups will be assessed at baseline, midpoint, and post-intervention. Pain (VAS) and function (ODI) will serve as primary outcomes. Clinically significant improvement is defined as ODI scores ≥15% and reductions in VAS pain scores ≥2 points as compared to the sham yoga group. Secondary outcomes will include PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form. Hypothesis 2: The Y+M will have greater improvements than the YG.
Aim 3: To compare between-group changes in psychological health between tele-yoga with breath regulation, focused attention/meditation and tele-yoga without breath regulation, focused attention/meditation. Psychological measures include Beck Anxiety Inventory, Beck Depression Inventory, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index and compared between both groups. Secondary measures include symptoms of CS with standard measures of Fibromyalgia 2016 (FM) survey32. Hypothesis 3: The Y+M will have greater improvements than the Y-M.
This project is highly innovative in its focus on 1) gaining participants' perspective with tele-yoga delivery and 2) telehealth-delivered, mind-body intervention specifically targeting central pain sensitization in CLBP with potential exploration of underlying mechanisms of yoga. The project is significant with potentially improving access to virtual treatment options that may potentially lead to self-management of CLBP. Expected outcomes of this research include evidence to support tele-yoga as an effective, accessible integrative therapy for reducing centrally mediated pain symptoms.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:30 - 80
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Spine Surgery, Neurological Conditions, Pregnancy, Others
40 Participants Needed
Cryoneurolysis vs Radiofrequency Ablation for Low Back Pain
Kansas City, Kansas
Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Currently available treatment options for treating low back facet joint pain include acupuncture, pain medications, psychotherapy, anti-inflammatory steroid injections into the joints, exercise, physical therapy, rest, chiropractic treatments, surgery, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). RFA uses radio waves to target and burn the nerves that send the pain signals to the participant's brain. The purpose of this study is to compare the standard treatment of RFA to a newer therapy called iovera°. The iovera° system is a newer procedure for nerve pain that freezes the targeted nerves leading to a temporary block of the nerve without causing any permanent damage to the nerve. With the nerve blocked, pain is immediately relieved. The nerve reconnects over time and goes back to working exactly as it did before the procedure. The investigators want to see if iovera° therapy is effective in treating people with facet joint-mediated chronic low back pain (CLBP).
If the participant decide to participate in the study, the investigators will ask the participant to undergo either an RFA or iovera° procedure to treat the participant's CLBP. After the procedure, the investigators will ask the participant to complete surveys to track the participant's response to the procedure at 15 time points over a 1-year period. These time points consist of phone calls and online surveys.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cancer, Back Surgery, Drug Abuse, Others
30 Participants Needed
Why Other Patients Applied
"I have dealt with voice and vocal fold issues related to paralysis for over 12 years. This problem has negatively impacted virtually every facet of my life. I am an otherwise healthy 48 year old married father of 3 living. My youngest daughter is 12 and has never heard my real voice. I am now having breathing issues related to the paralysis as well as trouble swallowing some liquids. In my research I have seen some recent trials focused on helping people like me."
AG
Paralysis PatientAge: 50
"I've been struggling with ADHD and anxiety since I was 9 years old. I'm currently 30. I really don't like how numb the medications make me feel. And especially now, that I've lost my grandma and my aunt 8 days apart, my anxiety has been even worse. So I'm trying to find something new."
FF
ADHD PatientAge: 31
"I changed my diet in 2020 and I’ve lost 95 pounds from my highest weight (283). I am 5’3”, female, and now 188. I still have a 33 BMI. I've been doing research on alternative approaches to continue my progress, which brought me here to consider clinical trials."
WR
Obesity PatientAge: 58
"I was diagnosed with stage 4 pancreatic cancer three months ago, metastatic to my liver, and I have been receiving and responding well to chemotherapy. My blood work revealed that my tumor markers have gone from 2600 in the beginning to 173 as of now, even with the delay in treatment, they are not going up. CT Scans reveal they have been shrinking as well. However, chemo is seriously deteriorating my body. I have 4 more treatments to go in this 12 treatment cycle. I am just interested in learning about my other options, if any are available to me."
ID
Pancreatic Cancer PatientAge: 40
"I've tried several different SSRIs over the past 23 years with no luck. Some of these new treatments seem interesting... haven't tried anything like them before. I really hope that one could work."
ZS
Depression PatientAge: 51
Sitting Ellipticals for Chronic Lower Back Pain
Boston, Massachusetts
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effect of non-weightbearing stationary ellipticals (Cubii, Fitness Cubed, Inc.) on patient well-being with chronic lower back pain (CLBP). The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Assess the effect of non-weightbearing stationary ellipticals on clinical outcomes inclduing vital signs, pain, disability, analgesic use, mental health, abdominal muscle strength, and compliance in patients with CLBP.
2. Assess the effect of placing the patients into an interactive virtual environment during the exercise sessions on the outcomes of the program
Participants will participate in 60 minute training sessions to see if there are effects to their CLBP.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Not Listed
64 Participants Needed
Chiropractic Care for Lower Back Pain
Boston, Massachusetts
The goal of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of new implementation strategies designed to increase the number of Primary Care Providers (PCPs) referrals to chiropractic care for lower back pain (LBP) in underserved populations. The investigators plan to pilot the strategies in three qualified community health centers (CHCs) and compare the number of LBP patients who receive referrals before and after implementation. The implementation strategies involve PCP, patient, and organizational interventions.
Patients presenting with LBP will be provided educational materials that focus on the safety and effectiveness of chiropractic care as an evidence-based treatment for LBP. Materials will be available in CHC common areas and may be sent to patients by their PCP via patient portal.
PCPs will participate in interactive lunch seminars to allow for inter-professional learning for PCPs. They will also participate in a survey regarding their attitudes and beliefs relating to chiropractic care. Currently, many PCPs cannot make chiropractic care referrals in the electronic health record (EHR). The investigators plan to add this option, or make it easier if the referral is already available.
This multi-level, multi-component approach will last two months, and will be rolled out sequentially in three clinics using a stepped-wedge design. The ordering of clinics will be random.
The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with LBP who received a referral to chiropractic care before and after the intervention. Secondary outcomes include referral to any non-pharmacologic treatment, use of imaging, and prescribed medications.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
3 Participants Needed
Virtual Reality Guided Acupuncture for Low Back Pain
Charlestown, Massachusetts
Testing the effect of Virtual Reality - guided imagery acupuncture
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cancer, Fractures, Pregnancy, Others
30 Participants Needed
Acupuncture Imagery for Low Back Pain
Charlestown, Massachusetts
In this study, the investigators will examine the analgesic effects of acupuncture imagery treatment in patients with chronic low back pain. The intervention used in this study is "video-guided acupuncture imagery treatment" (VGAIT) treatment. The control used in this study is sham (fake) VGAIT. Participants in each group will participate in 8 study sessions (including 6 treatment sessions) over the course of 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure for this study is change in low back pain severity score after each treatment session.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 60
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Cancer, Fractures, Infections, Others
80 Participants Needed
Testosterone Therapy for Pain in Postmenopausal Women
Boston, Massachusetts
The aim of this trial is to evaluate whether testosterone replacement results in greater improvement in pain perception, pain tolerance, sexual function, physical function and quality of life when compared with placebo in women with chronic back pain treated with opioids who have low testosterone.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Phase 2
Age:60+
Sex:Female
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Breast Cancer, Endometrial Cancer, Diabetes, Others
Must Be Taking:Opioid Analgesics
40 Participants Needed
Physiotherapist-Led Care for Back Pain
Kingston, Ontario
This is a cluster randomized controlled trial to to evaluate the individual and health system impacts of implementing a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for back pain in Canada.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Active Not Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:19+
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Non-consent, Language Barrier, Cancer
1560 Participants Needed
Chiropractic Maintenance Care for Back Pain
Toronto, Ontario
Previous studies showed that some back pain patients (with specific characteristics) present less days with pain when treated with chiropractic maintenance care. A clinical instrument (called MAINTAIN instrument) was developed to identify those patients who would benefit from chiropractic maintenance care. This study will investigate the impact of using the MAINTAIN instrument in clinical practice. This study will help to improve clinical care of patients with back and neck pain by providing them with more individualized care.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 65
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Cancer, Osteoporosis, Others
220 Participants Needed
EMMA Massage Therapy for Lower Back Pain
Rochester, Minnesota
The purpose of this study is to gather information about patient experience receiving a massage through a robotic EMMA (Expert Manipulative Massage Automation) compared to receiving a massage from a massage therapist.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Not Yet Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Bleeding Disorders, Cardiovascular Events, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Pain Medications
40 Participants Needed
Laser Therapy for Lower Back Pain
Rochester, Minnesota
The purpose of this research study is to gather information on the effectiveness of the Trident low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in combination with clinical patient education manuals to reduce lower back pain.
No Placebo Group
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Pregnancy, Cardiovascular Events, Uncontrolled Diabetes, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Pain Medications
60 Participants Needed
Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Chronic Back Pain
Trois-Rivières, Quebec
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the effects of spinal manipulative therapy in individuals with chronic primary low back pain and determine the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying pain relief. The main questions it aims to answer are: • Is pain relief produced by spinal manipulative therapy in patients with chronic primary low back pain caused by a reduction of C-fiber-related nociceptive processing? • Are these effects greater when spinal manipulative therapy is applied to the whole spine where it is clinically indicated compared with lumbar spine only? • Are these effects greater after 36 treatments over 3 months compared with 12 treatments over 1 month. Participants will receive spinal manipulative therapy (all clinically indicated spine segments or back only) or a control intervention. A group of healthy volunteers will be recruited to assess secondary outcome measures over the same time period, as reference data for comparisons. Researchers will compare the two groups receiving spinal manipulative therapy to the group receiving the control intervention to see if clinical pain relief and the reduction of temporal summation of second pain (produced experimentally) is significantly greater with spinal manipulative therapy.
Trial Details
Trial Status:Recruiting
Trial Phase:Unphased
Age:18 - 60
Key Eligibility Criteria
Disqualifiers:Neurological Deficit, Recent Surgery, Pregnancy, Others
Must Not Be Taking:Anticoagulants
112 Participants Needed
Know someone looking for new options?
Spread the word
Learn More About Power
We started Power when my dad was diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and I struggled to help him access the latest immunotherapy. Hopefully Power makes it simpler for you to explore promising new treatments, during what is probably a difficult time.
Bask GillCEO at Power
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do Low Back Pain clinical trials in Miami, FL pay?
Each trial will compensate patients a different amount, but $50-100 for each visit is a fairly common range for Phase 2–4 trials (Phase 1 trials often pay substantially more). Further, most trials will cover the costs of a travel to-and-from the clinic.
How do Low Back Pain clinical trials in Miami, FL work?
After a researcher reviews your profile, they may choose to invite you in to a screening appointment, where they'll determine if you meet 100% of the eligibility requirements. If you do, you'll be sorted into one of the treatment groups, and receive your study drug. For some trials, there is a chance you'll receive a placebo. Across Low Back Pain trials in Miami, FL 30% of clinical trials have a placebo. Typically, you'll be required to check-in with the clinic every month or so. The average trial length in Miami, FL for Low Back Pain is 12 months.
How do I participate in a study as a "healthy volunteer"?
Not all studies recruit healthy volunteers: usually, Phase 1 studies do. Participating as a healthy volunteer means you will go to a research facility in Miami, FL several times over a few days or weeks to receive a dose of either the test treatment or a "placebo," which is a harmless substance that helps researchers compare results. You will have routine tests during these visits, and you'll be compensated for your time and travel, with the number of appointments and details varying by study.
What does the "phase" of a clinical trial mean?
The phase of a trial reveals what stage the drug is in to get approval for a specific condition. Phase 1 trials are the trials to collect safety data in humans. Phase 2 trials are those where the drug has some data showing safety in humans, but where further human data is needed on drug effectiveness. Phase 3 trials are in the final step before approval. The drug already has data showing both safety and effectiveness. As a general rule, Phase 3 trials are more promising than Phase 2, and Phase 2 trials are more promising than phase 1.
Do I need to be insured to participate in a Low Back Pain medical study in Miami, FL?
Clinical trials are almost always free to participants, and so do not require insurance. The only exception here are trials focused on cancer, because only a small part of the typical treatment plan is actually experimental. For these cancer trials, participants typically need insurance to cover all the non-experimental components.
What are the newest Low Back Pain clinical trials in Miami, FL?
Most recently, we added Yoga for Chronic Lower Back Pain, Yoga + Neuromodulation for Chronic Low Back Pain and IDCT for Degenerative Disc Disease to the Power online platform.
Popular Searches
By Condition
By Location
Other People Viewed
By Subject
By Trial
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.