Microsurgery for Gum Disease
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial aims to determine if using a microscope, which provides much higher magnification than regular dental glasses, can improve healing after gum surgery. It tests two methods: one using a microscope for surgery (microsurgery) and another using standard dental glasses with magnification. Individuals needing gum surgery for periodontal disease and who can easily travel to appointments might be suitable for this study. As an unphased trial, participants have the opportunity to contribute to innovative research that could enhance future dental procedures.
Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.
What prior data suggests that this microsurgery technique is safe for gum disease treatment?
Research has shown that using a microscope during dental procedures can enhance healing. Studies have found that microsurgery, which uses tiny tools and a microscope, often results in better outcomes and less discomfort than traditional methods. For instance, using a microscope during surgery can leave less tissue behind and improve the early appearance of healing.
Although some studies indicate that microsurgery does not always outperform in every aspect, it generally yields good results. This suggests that microsurgery is usually safe and well-tolerated for dental procedures. Therefore, participants in a trial can feel confident in the safety of the treatment based on past research.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about microsurgery for gum disease because it offers a more precise approach to wound closure. Unlike the standard use of dental loupes, which provide a basic magnified view, the microsurgical technique employs a digital microscope to greatly enhance visualization. This could lead to more accurate incisions and potentially faster healing with less trauma to the gum tissue. By improving these aspects, microsurgery might advance the care and outcomes for patients with gum disease.
What evidence suggests that using a microscope for gum disease surgery is effective?
This trial will compare two methods for incision closure in gum disease treatment: a microsurgical approach and a standard approach using dental loupes. Studies have shown that microsurgery can be more effective than traditional methods for treating gum disease. Research indicates that this technique results in less pain and discomfort after surgery. Additionally, patients who undergo microsurgery tend to heal better compared to those receiving standard treatments. The higher precision of microsurgery helps achieve better results, leading to healthier gums and improved recovery. Overall, evidence suggests that microsurgery offers promising benefits for treating gum disease.16789
Who Is on the Research Team?
Angela Palaiologou-Gallis, DDS
Principal Investigator
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for individuals with periodontal (gum) disease. It's designed to see if a microsurgical approach using a digital microscope can improve healing compared to standard magnification glasses used in dental procedures.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants undergo surgical procedures using either a microsurgical approach with a digital microscope or a standard approach with dental loupes
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for early soft tissue wound healing
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Microsurgery
Trial Overview
The study is testing the effectiveness of performing gum surgery with high magnification provided by a digital microscope versus the traditional use of dental loupes that offer less magnification.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Microsurgical approach to wound closure using a digital microscope to enhance view
Standard of care surgical approach to wound closure using Dental Loupes.
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Lead Sponsor
Citations
1.
journals.lww.com
journals.lww.com/jhns/fulltext/2024/12020/periodontal_microsurgery__systematic_review_and.5.aspxPeriodontal Microsurgery: Systematic Review and Meta ...
The study found that the microsurgical approach resulted in less postoperative pain and discomfort compared to the macrosurgical method.
Efficacy of microsurgery in comparison to macrosurgery for ...
The microsurgical technique demonstrated greater effectiveness than the conventional scalpel technique in achieving improved clinical outcomes ...
Periodontal microsurgery: Reaching new heights of precision
Perusal of the data from the reviewed literature justifies that periodontal microsurgery seems to show promising clinical results along with an increased ...
s-0043-1773798.pdf - Thieme Connect
This study compared the efficacy of conventional and microsurgical access flap in the management of horizontal bony defects in chronic ...
Comparative Evaluation of Microsurgical and Conventional ...
Background & Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the periodontal treatment outcomes in patients with chronic.
Early wound healing outcomes after regenerative ...
The aim of the present systematic review was to compare the early wound healing after regenerative periodontal surgery with either EMD or GTR treatment.
7.
jag.journalagent.com
jag.journalagent.com/ejm/pdfs/EJM-50133-ORIGINAL_ARTICLE-GUZELDEMIR-AKCAKANAT.pdfMicro and Macrosurgical Treatment of Gingival Recessions
The clinical results of microsurgery do not show superiority over conventional surgical techniques in the treatment of localized gingival ...
Clinical outcomes of using operating microscope for alveolar ...
The use of OM for ARP resulted in significantly fewer tissue remnants and favorable early visual wound healing.
Evaluating and comparing the efficacy of the microsurgical ...
Conclusions: The use of the microsurgical approach provides better clinical results with less discomfort, and thus makes the periodontal ...
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.