25 Participants Needed

Microsurgery for Gum Disease

AP
Overseen ByAngela Palaiologou-Gallis, DDS
Age: 18 - 65
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to determine if using a microscope, which provides much higher magnification than regular dental glasses, can improve healing after gum surgery. It tests two methods: one using a microscope for surgery (microsurgery) and another using standard dental glasses with magnification. Individuals needing gum surgery for periodontal disease and who can easily travel to appointments might be suitable for this study. As an unphased trial, participants have the opportunity to contribute to innovative research that could enhance future dental procedures.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What prior data suggests that this microsurgery technique is safe for gum disease treatment?

Research has shown that using a microscope during dental procedures can enhance healing. Studies have found that microsurgery, which uses tiny tools and a microscope, often results in better outcomes and less discomfort than traditional methods. For instance, using a microscope during surgery can leave less tissue behind and improve the early appearance of healing.

Although some studies indicate that microsurgery does not always outperform in every aspect, it generally yields good results. This suggests that microsurgery is usually safe and well-tolerated for dental procedures. Therefore, participants in a trial can feel confident in the safety of the treatment based on past research.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about microsurgery for gum disease because it offers a more precise approach to wound closure. Unlike the standard use of dental loupes, which provide a basic magnified view, the microsurgical technique employs a digital microscope to greatly enhance visualization. This could lead to more accurate incisions and potentially faster healing with less trauma to the gum tissue. By improving these aspects, microsurgery might advance the care and outcomes for patients with gum disease.

What evidence suggests that using a microscope for gum disease surgery is effective?

This trial will compare two methods for incision closure in gum disease treatment: a microsurgical approach and a standard approach using dental loupes. Studies have shown that microsurgery can be more effective than traditional methods for treating gum disease. Research indicates that this technique results in less pain and discomfort after surgery. Additionally, patients who undergo microsurgery tend to heal better compared to those receiving standard treatments. The higher precision of microsurgery helps achieve better results, leading to healthier gums and improved recovery. Overall, evidence suggests that microsurgery offers promising benefits for treating gum disease.16789

Who Is on the Research Team?

AP

Angela Palaiologou-Gallis, DDS

Principal Investigator

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for individuals with periodontal (gum) disease. It's designed to see if a microsurgical approach using a digital microscope can improve healing compared to standard magnification glasses used in dental procedures.

Inclusion Criteria

ASA I or II
I need surgery for gum disease in my upper or lower jaw.
I have reliable transportation for all clinic and study visits.
See 2 more

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnancy, or those planning to become pregnant
Diabetics with an HbA1c >7.1
Non-English speaking
See 2 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo surgical procedures using either a microsurgical approach with a digital microscope or a standard approach with dental loupes

3 weeks
3 visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for early soft tissue wound healing

3 weeks
3 visits (in-person)

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Microsurgery
Trial Overview The study is testing the effectiveness of performing gum surgery with high magnification provided by a digital microscope versus the traditional use of dental loupes that offer less magnification.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Group 1: Microsurgical incision closureExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Group 2: Dental loupes incision closureActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Lead Sponsor

Trials
486
Recruited
92,500+

Citations

Periodontal Microsurgery: Systematic Review and Meta ...The study found that the microsurgical approach resulted in less postoperative pain and discomfort compared to the macrosurgical method.
Efficacy of microsurgery in comparison to macrosurgery for ...The microsurgical technique demonstrated greater effectiveness than the conventional scalpel technique in achieving improved clinical outcomes ...
Periodontal microsurgery: Reaching new heights of precisionPerusal of the data from the reviewed literature justifies that periodontal microsurgery seems to show promising clinical results along with an increased ...
s-0043-1773798.pdf - Thieme ConnectThis study compared the efficacy of conventional and microsurgical access flap in the management of horizontal bony defects in chronic ...
Comparative Evaluation of Microsurgical and Conventional ...Background & Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the periodontal treatment outcomes in patients with chronic.
Early wound healing outcomes after regenerative ...The aim of the present systematic review was to compare the early wound healing after regenerative periodontal surgery with either EMD or GTR treatment.
Micro and Macrosurgical Treatment of Gingival RecessionsThe clinical results of microsurgery do not show superiority over conventional surgical techniques in the treatment of localized gingival ...
Clinical outcomes of using operating microscope for alveolar ...The use of OM for ARP resulted in significantly fewer tissue remnants and favorable early visual wound healing.
Evaluating and comparing the efficacy of the microsurgical ...Conclusions: The use of the microsurgical approach provides better clinical results with less discomfort, and thus makes the periodontal ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security