Comparison of Artificial Disc Implants in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This study will comprehensively evaluate the outcomes and endpoints of these two different FDA-approved artificial disc implants used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy and/or radiculopathy today: Biomet Zimmer Mobi-C and Nuvasive Simplify. Both implants are structurally different with the Nuvasive Simplify implementing a three-piece design with two endplates and a semi-constrained mobile core while the Biomet Zimmer Mobi-C implements an unconstrained three piece design. Subjects will be age-matched and randomly assigned to either implant with informed consent. All subjects will undergo a variety of assessments that evaluate neck disability, quality of life, pain, physiological outcome (radiographic assessments), and neck range-of motion before and after their procedure. One baseline testing will be conducted along with three post-operation visits (three months, six months, and one year) in accordance to standard follow-up procedure. Thus, the duration of participation in the study will be approximately one and a half years.
Who Is on the Research Team?
Daniel C Lu, MD, PhD
Principal Investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
Inclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Baseline Assessment
Baseline testing conducted to evaluate neck disability, quality of life, pain, physiological outcome, and neck range-of-motion
Surgery and Initial Recovery
Participants undergo cervical arthroplasty with either the Nuvasive Simplify or Biomet Zimmer Mobi-C artificial disc implant
Post-operative Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness with assessments at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post-operation
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Biomet Zimmer Mobi-C
- Nuvasive Simplify
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
University of California, Los Angeles
Lead Sponsor