312 Participants Needed

Heart to Heart for High Blood Pressure

EM
YC
CT
EL
WJ
SR
Overseen BySteve Rothschild, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Rush University Medical Center
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

This is a 12-month behavioral cluster-randomized trial testing a church-based intervention to reduce blood pressure in African Americans with uncontrolled blood pressure.

Do I have to stop taking my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It is best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment Heart to Heart for high blood pressure?

A program that combines education, empowerment, and monitoring, similar to the Heart to Heart treatment, has been shown to improve health outcomes and reduce healthcare costs for managing high blood pressure.12345

Is the Heart to Heart treatment safe for humans?

The Heart to Heart program is a computer-based tool designed to help assess and reduce the risk of coronary heart disease, and there is no specific safety data available for it as a treatment. However, it involves evaluating risk factors and suggesting interventions like aspirin or antihypertensive medication, which are generally considered safe when used appropriately.16789

How is the Heart to Heart treatment for high blood pressure different from other treatments?

The Heart to Heart treatment is unique because it uses a computer-based decision aid to provide personalized, evidence-based information about heart disease risk and potential interventions, helping patients and providers make informed decisions about managing high blood pressure.16101112

Eligibility Criteria

This trial is for African American adults with uncontrolled high blood pressure who attend church regularly and can join weekly Zoom meetings. Eligible churches must have a majority of African American members and be able to recruit participants. People unable to make dietary changes or give informed consent, planning to move soon, or with certain medical conditions are excluded.

Inclusion Criteria

Churches: At least 75 members and ability to recruit 15 study participants
I can attend weekly meetings on Zoom.
Participants: Consents and completes all baseline assessments
See 3 more

Exclusion Criteria

I cannot eat vegetables due to a severe medical condition.
Participants: Member of household participating in another church
Participants: Plans to move within the 6 months following enrollment
See 4 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants engage in a 12-month church-based intervention to reduce blood pressure

12 months
Regular church-based sessions

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for changes in blood pressure, medication adherence, and quality of life

3 months
Follow-up assessments at 15 months

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Heart to Heart
  • Money Smart
Trial Overview The study tests 'Heart to Heart', a heart health intervention, and 'Money Smart', a financial wellness program in churches over 12 months. It's randomized, meaning participants are put into groups by chance to compare the effects on blood pressure control among African Americans.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Heart to HeartExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Money SmartActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Rush University Medical Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
448
Recruited
247,000+

Findings from Research

Home blood pressure telemonitoring (HBPT) significantly improved blood pressure control, reducing systolic blood pressure by 4.71 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure by 2.45 mmHg compared to usual care, with a higher proportion of patients achieving normalized blood pressure levels.
While HBPT led to increased healthcare costs per patient, it also improved the physical quality of life and did not increase the risk of adverse events, suggesting it is a beneficial but more expensive option for managing hypertension.
Clinical usefulness and cost effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring: meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.Omboni, S., Gazzola, T., Carabelli, G., et al.[2023]
Heart failure disease management (HFDM) programs can improve patient outcomes and reduce hospitalizations, but implementing these programs results in significant financial losses for healthcare providers, with estimated losses of $179,549 for physicians, $464,132 for integrated health systems, and $652,643 for hospitals in the first year.
While third-party payers can save approximately $713,661 annually for managing 350 patients in HFDM programs, the lack of financial incentives for providers limits the adoption of these beneficial programs.
Financial implications of a model heart failure disease management program for providers, hospital, healthcare systems, and payer perspectives.Whellan, DJ., Reed, SD., Liao, L., et al.[2019]
The pilot disease management program for congestive heart failure (CHF) implemented by Blue Cross and Blue Shield Federal Employee Program showed a significant financial return, saving $1.08 for every dollar spent from the perspective of the funding organization.
When considering savings for all payers, the program yielded a return of $1.15 for every dollar spent, indicating its potential effectiveness in reducing medical expenditures related to CHF management.
What can a pilot congestive heart failure disease management program tell us about likely return on investment?: A case study from a program offered to federal employees.vanVonno, CJ., Ozminkowski, RJ., Smith, MW., et al.[2019]

References

Clinical usefulness and cost effectiveness of home blood pressure telemonitoring: meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. [2023]
Financial implications of a model heart failure disease management program for providers, hospital, healthcare systems, and payer perspectives. [2019]
What can a pilot congestive heart failure disease management program tell us about likely return on investment?: A case study from a program offered to federal employees. [2019]
Standard vs. intensified management of heart failure to reduce healthcare costs: results of a multicentre, randomized controlled trial. [2022]
Implementation of a self-measured blood pressure program in a community pharmacy: A pilot study. [2022]
Heart to Heart: a computerized decision aid for assessment of coronary heart disease risk and the impact of risk-reduction interventions for primary prevention. [2019]
Home blood pressure monitors owned by participants in a large decentralised clinical trial in hypertension: the Treatment In Morning versus Evening (TIME) study. [2023]
Cardiovascular Events and Costs With Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management for Uncontrolled Hypertension. [2021]
9.Russia (Federation)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[Prevention and treatment of hypertension at the population level: the Minnesota Heart Health Program]. [2017]
10.United Statespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The National High Blood Pressure Education Program: measuring progress and assessing its impact. [2004]
Implementing a home-based virtual hypertension programme-a pilot feasibility study. [2023]
12.Russia (Federation)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[Clinical and economic effectiveness of the activity of a hypertensive patient school]. [2019]