Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial tests whether six radiotherapy treatments per week are more effective than five for treating head and neck cancer after surgery. It targets individuals with specific types of head and neck cancers, such as those in the throat, mouth, or neck, who require additional treatment post-surgery. Participants should have undergone surgery more than six weeks ago but within 112 days. The trial aims to determine if the accelerated radiotherapy schedule improves outcomes compared to the conventional schedule. As an unphased trial, it provides patients the opportunity to contribute to innovative research that could enhance future cancer treatment strategies.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.
Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?
Research has shown that six radiotherapy treatments per week, instead of the usual five, can be safe for people with head and neck cancer. In one study, 89% of patients completed their treatment plans, indicating that most handled the treatment well. Another study found that this treatment schedule can extend patients' lives.
While these studies focus on survival and treatment completion, they suggest that more frequent treatments are generally safe and manageable for most people. However, as with any treatment, side effects or risks may occur. It is important to consult a doctor for personalized advice and to understand all possible outcomes.12345Why are researchers excited about this trial?
Researchers are excited about accelerated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer because it offers a potentially faster treatment option compared to the conventional approach. While standard radiotherapy typically involves five sessions per week, the accelerated version includes six sessions, with one day offering two treatments. This approach aims to deliver the same overall radiation dose in a shorter period, which could enhance the effectiveness of the treatment by reducing the time cancer cells have to recover and potentially improving patient outcomes.
What evidence suggests that accelerated radiotherapy might be an effective treatment for head and neck cancer?
This trial will compare two treatment approaches for head and neck cancer: accelerated radiotherapy and conventional radiotherapy. Research has shown that accelerated radiotherapy, which participants in this trial may receive, involves more frequent sessions and can better control the cancer at its origin, reducing the likelihood of recurrence. Some evidence also suggests that this method might extend patients' lives. Accelerated radiotherapy could be particularly beneficial for those whose cancer is related to alcohol and tobacco use.13678
Who Is on the Research Team?
Ryan Hughes, M.D.
Principal Investigator
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for patients with certain head and neck cancers who've had surgery over 6 weeks ago. It's not specified who can't join, but typically those with poor health or other serious conditions might be excluded.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants receive either accelerated or conventional fractionation radiotherapy
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- Accelerated Radiotherapy
- Conventional Radiotherapy
Trial Overview
The study compares two types of radiotherapy: accelerated (6 treatments/week) versus conventional (5 treatments/week), to see which is more effective for head and neck cancer post-surgery.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
6 fractions per week, daily treatment plus twice daily treatment for 1 day Monday-Friday; dosage at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist per standard of care
5 fractions per week, daily treatment Monday-Friday; dosage at the discretion of the treating radiation oncologist per standard of care
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead Sponsor
Published Research Related to This Trial
Citations
Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy for head and ...
The results of this meta‐analysis suggest that altered fractionation radiotherapy improves survival in patients with head and neck cancer. Comparison of the ...
Accelerated fractionation (AF) compared to conventional ...
Conclusions: This trial shows that accelerated radiotherapy improves loco-regional control in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. A less toxic scheme ...
Accelerated radiotherapy effective in alcohol-, tobacco ...
Accelerated radiation treatment could reduce head and neck cancer patient burden in low- and middle-income countries (press release). Available ...
Understanding the impact of radiotherapy fractionation on ...
This dataset is very useful for investigating the effects of different radiotherapy fractionation schemes on HNSCC patient survival.
A prospective, multicenter DAHANCA study of ...
Background: The study aimed to evaluate Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (HART) with nimorazole for patients with head and neck squamous cell ...
The UPGRADE-RT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
The primary outcome was normalcy of diet score at 1 year. The secondary outcome was recurrence in electively irradiated nodes at 2 years in the ...
A randomised trial of accelerated versus conventional ...
Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis · Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy ...
A Safe and Effective Option for Head and Neck Cancer in ...
Disease-free and overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Fifty-eight out of 65 patients (89%) completed both courses of ...
Other People Viewed
By Subject
By Trial
Related Searches
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.