40 Participants Needed

Hip Surgery Options for Femoral Neck Fracture

Recruiting at 11 trial locations
HP
Overseen ByHeather Phipps, MPS
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: University of Maryland, Baltimore
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Trial Summary

What is the purpose of this trial?

The goal of this randomized pilot study is to assess feasibility of the trial and to collect information to inform the design of a definitive trial. Adult patients ages 60 years or older with a low-energy minimally displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) treated with surgery will be eligible to participate in the study. Patients will be randomized to one of two treatment groups, hip arthroplasty or internal fixation. Participants will be followed for 1 year.

Do I need to stop my current medications for the trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. Please consult with the study team for guidance.

What data supports the effectiveness of the treatment for femoral neck fractures?

Research shows that both arthroplasty (hip replacement) and internal fixation (using screws or plates to hold bones together) are common treatments for femoral neck fractures. Arthroplasty may have a lower re-operation rate compared to internal fixation, especially when internal fixation fails, suggesting it might be more effective in some cases.12345

Is hip surgery for femoral neck fractures generally safe?

Hip surgeries like total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) are generally safe, but they can have complications. Internal fixation may have a higher risk of issues like bone not healing properly or losing blood supply, while arthroplasty is considered for complex cases.36789

How does the treatment for femoral neck fracture differ from other treatments?

The treatment options for femoral neck fractures include arthroplasty (hip replacement) and internal fixation (using screws or plates to hold the bone together). Arthroplasty allows for early patient mobilization and has a lower risk of needing revision surgery compared to internal fixation, which is associated with higher risks of complications like bone displacement and non-union.123610

Research Team

Dr. M. Gerard-Paul Slobogean, MD ...

Gerard Slobogean, MD

Principal Investigator

University of Maryland, Baltimore

JP

Joseph Patterson, MD

Principal Investigator

University of Southern California

SS

Sheila Sprague, PhD

Principal Investigator

McMaster University

Eligibility Criteria

This study is for adults aged 60 or older with a specific type of hip fracture (minimally displaced femoral neck fracture) from a low-energy fall. Candidates must be able to undergo surgery and give informed consent themselves or through a proxy. Surgeons performing the operation should be skilled in both arthroplasty and internal fixation techniques.

Inclusion Criteria

You or someone else has agreed to participate in the study after learning about it.
I am 60 years old or older.
I have a confirmed complete break in my hip bone.
See 3 more

Timeline

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants are randomized to receive either hip arthroplasty or internal fixation surgery

Surgery and immediate recovery

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, with visits at 6 weeks, 4 months, 8 months, and 1 year

12 months
4 visits (in-person)

Treatment Details

Interventions

  • Arthroplasty
  • Internal Fixation
Trial Overview The trial is testing two surgical treatments for hip fractures: hip arthroplasty (replacing part or all of the hip joint) versus internal fixation (stabilizing the bone with hardware). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of these groups and monitored for one year to inform future larger studies.
Participant Groups
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: ArthroplastyExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
A modern porous-coated press-fit or cemented hip arthroplasty prosthesis will be used at the treating surgeon's discretion. Press-fit implants that have no ingrowth or ongrowth surface will not be permitted. We recommend surgeons consider a total hip arthroplasty for younger active, independent participants; conversely, a hemiarthroplasty is recommended for more frail, lower-demand participants. Similarly, cemented arthroplasty for older adult participants is also recommended. The surgical approach and the use of post-operative hip precautions will be determined by the treating surgeon.
Group II: Internal FixationActive Control1 Intervention
Based on the fracture displacement eligibility criteria, minimal or no reduction is expected during the surgical procedure. However, the treating surgeon will be allowed to perform fracture reduction maneuvers if desired. Fixed angle devices and multiple screws will be permitted. The internal fixation device(s) will be inserted through a small lateral incision. If using multiple cancellous screws, an inverted triangle or similar screw pattern is recommended. Fixed angle devices, such as a sliding hip screw (with or without an anti-rotation screw) or newer multi-screw fixed angle devices will also be permitted. Internal fixation constructs combining cancellous screws and fixed angle devices will be permitted.

Arthroplasty is already approved in European Union, United States, Canada, Japan for the following indications:

πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί
Approved in European Union as Hip Arthroplasty for:
  • Severe osteoarthritis
  • Fractures of the hip joint
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Avascular necrosis
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
Approved in United States as Hip Replacement for:
  • Severe osteoarthritis
  • Fractures of the hip joint
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Avascular necrosis
πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦
Approved in Canada as Hip Arthroplasty for:
  • Severe osteoarthritis
  • Fractures of the hip joint
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Avascular necrosis
πŸ‡―πŸ‡΅
Approved in Japan as Hip Replacement for:
  • Severe osteoarthritis
  • Fractures of the hip joint
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Avascular necrosis

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Maryland, Baltimore

Lead Sponsor

Trials
729
Recruited
540,000+

University of Southern California

Collaborator

Trials
956
Recruited
1,609,000+

McMaster University

Collaborator

Trials
936
Recruited
2,630,000+

Orthopaedic Trauma Association

Collaborator

Trials
34
Recruited
5,100+

Findings from Research

Arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures significantly reduces the risk of needing revision surgery compared to internal fixation, with a relative risk of 0.23, indicating it is a more stable option in the long term.
However, arthroplasty is associated with higher rates of infection, greater blood loss, and longer operating times, as well as a potential increase in early mortality rates, suggesting that while it may be effective, it comes with increased risks.
Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis.Bhandari, M., Devereaux, PJ., Swiontkowski, MF., et al.[2022]
In a study of 44 patients with femoral neck fractures, partial-threaded cannulated screws resulted in a significantly shorter time to union and fewer complications compared to full-threaded compression screws.
Despite the differences in union time and complication rates, both types of screws provided similar functional outcomes as measured by the Harris Hip Score, indicating that partial-threaded screws may be a safer and equally effective option for treatment.
Should full threaded compression screws be used in adult femoral neck fractures?Okcu, G., Γ–zkayΔ±n, N., Erkan, S., et al.[2022]
In a study of 3423 patients aged 65 and older with femoral neck fractures, there were no significant differences in 30-day mortality rates among those who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty (HA), or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).
Patients who had ORIF or HA were less likely to experience respiratory complications compared to those who underwent THA, suggesting that these surgical options may be safer in terms of respiratory health.
Open reduction internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in the elderly: a review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.Fisher, MA., Matthei, JD., Obirieze, A., et al.[2019]

References

Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. A meta-analysis. [2022]
Should full threaded compression screws be used in adult femoral neck fractures? [2022]
Open reduction internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty in the elderly: a review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. [2019]
The role of internal fixation in the treatment of femoral head necrosis with ipsilateral hip fracture. [2023]
Comparison of re-operation rates following primary and secondary hemiarthroplasty of the hip. [2016]
Failed internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. [2016]
Primary prosthetic replacement in per- and intertrochanteric fractures. [2018]
Acute total hip arthroplasty versus open reduction internal fixation for posterior wall acetabular fractures in middle-aged patients. [2022]
Which Surgical Approach Provides Maximum Visualization and Access for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Femoral Head Fractures? [2022]
Revision rates after surgical treatment for femoral neck fractures: results of 2-year follow-up. [2018]
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Back to top
Terms of ServiceΒ·Privacy PolicyΒ·CookiesΒ·Security