Carotid Procedures for Carotid Artery Stenosis

(C2LOE Trial)

Enrolling by invitation at 66 trial locations
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Academic
Sponsor: Mayo Clinic
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial examines the long-term effectiveness of two procedures: carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting. Both treatments aim to improve blood flow in the neck arteries, helping to prevent strokes. The trial compares these procedures with intensive medical care to determine which is most effective. It is ideal for individuals who participated in the previous CREST-2 study and can provide consent. Participants should speak English or Spanish. As a Phase 3 trial, this study represents the final step before FDA approval, offering participants an opportunity to contribute to significant advancements in stroke prevention.

Do I need to stop my current medications for this trial?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications.

What is the safety track record for these treatments?

Research has shown that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is generally safe, even for individuals with risk factors. One study found a 1.3% chance of stroke within 30 days for patients with one risk factor. For those with multiple risk factors, the stroke rate was slightly higher at 1.4%. However, early complications such as bruising, internal bleeding (hematoma), and brief strokes (transient ischemic attacks) can occur in about 8.7% of cases.

Studies have also examined carotid stenting (CAS). The risk of stroke or death within 30 days after this procedure is around 4.0%. Specifically, 1.2% of patients experienced death, while 3.0% had a stroke. Some patients also encountered issues like bleeding in the brain (intracranial hemorrhage) and blockage in the stent (in-stent occlusion).

Both treatments carry risks but are generally considered safe for stroke prevention. Discuss with a doctor to determine the best option.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about the treatments being evaluated in the CREST-2 Long-term Observational Extension Study because they offer potentially safer and more effective options for managing carotid artery disease. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a surgical procedure that physically removes plaque from the artery, potentially reducing the risk of stroke with a well-established technique. Meanwhile, carotid stenting (CAS) involves inserting a small mesh tube to keep the artery open, which is less invasive and may offer quicker recovery times. Both treatments are being assessed alongside intensive medical management to see if they can provide better long-term outcomes compared to current standard medical therapies, which typically focus on medication and lifestyle changes alone.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for carotid artery disease?

Research has shown that carotid endarterectomy (CEA), one of the treatments studied in this trial, can significantly lower the risk of stroke. One study found that people who underwent CEA were 3.1% less likely to have a stroke over five years compared to those who only received medication. Another study found that after CEA, the yearly risk of stroke was just 0.60%. Carotid stenting (CAS), another treatment option in this trial, has shown similar short-term results to CEA, such as the risk of stroke and death within 30 days. However, CAS requires experienced doctors because the procedure takes time to master. Overall, both CEA and CAS have effectively reduced stroke risk for patients with carotid artery problems. Participants in this trial will be assigned to different treatment arms to further evaluate these interventions.678910

Who Is on the Research Team?

JM

James Meschia, MD

Principal Investigator

Mayo Clinic

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

Inclusion Criteria

Currently active or graduated participants in the CREST-2 randomized trial at a site located in the United States
Able to provide written informed consent by self
Fluent in English

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo carotid endarterectomy or carotid stenting as part of the CREST-2 trial

Up to 4 years

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for stroke prevention efficacy and safety after treatment

7-8 years
Telephone contact every 6 months

Long-term Observational Extension

Participants continue to be monitored for stroke prevention in the long term

Up to 10 years
Telephone contact every 6 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Carotid Endarterectomy
  • Carotid Stenting
  • Intensive Medical Management

How Is the Trial Designed?

4

Treatment groups

Experimental Treatment

Group I: Intensive Medical Management Group - no CEAExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group II: Intensive Medical Management Group - no CASExperimental Treatment1 Intervention
Group III: Carotid Stenting Group (CAS)Experimental Treatment2 Interventions
Group IV: Carotid Endarterectomy Group (CEA)Experimental Treatment2 Interventions

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Mayo Clinic

Lead Sponsor

Trials
3,427
Recruited
3,221,000+

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Collaborator

Trials
1,677
Recruited
2,458,000+

Medical University of South Carolina

Collaborator

Trials
994
Recruited
7,408,000+

University of Maryland

Collaborator

Trials
171
Recruited
325,000+

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

Collaborator

Trials
1,403
Recruited
655,000+

Citations

A comparative effectiveness study of carotid intervention for ...

For instance, in year 5, CEA is estimated to have decreased the risk of ipsilateral stroke by 3.1% (95% CI 1.9%–4.4%) compared to patients who received medical ...

Carotid Artery Disease: Then and Now | Stroke

After the periprocedural period, the annual risk of stroke was 0.64% for CAS and 0.60% for CEA. Pooled analysis also confirmed the negative ...

Carotid Endarterectomy vs Initial Medical Therapy in ...

The observed 5-year risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke among patients with carotid stenosis in the pragmatic sample was 7.5% (95% CI, 6.5%-8.7%) ...

A comparative effectiveness study of carotid intervention for ...

Objective: The results of current prospective trials comparing the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) vs standard medical therapy for long-term ...

Clinical and anatomic outcomes after carotid endarterectomy

Our data demonstrate favorable 30-day and long-term outcomes after CEA and confirm the long-term stroke prevention accorded by CEA. The 30-day combined stroke/ ...

Contemporary Outcomes Following Carotid ...

The current perioperative 30-day stroke/death rate after carotid endarterectomy in high physiologic risk patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis is 4.7%.

Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Following ...

Schermerhorn and colleagues showed that 30‐day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occur in >7% of high‐risk patients undergoing CEA. To ...

Carotid endarterectomy remains safe in high-risk patients

Patients with a single risk factor had a stroke rate of 1.3% and those with multiple high-risk factors had a stroke rate of 1.4%. Take Home ...

Outcome of primary closure following carotid ...

Early complications (8.7%) included hematoma, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Late complications involved myocardial ...

Comparative on the effectiveness and safety of different ...

This study found that all three surgical methods are equally safe for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis and are effective in preventing stroke.