School-Based Asthma Program for Childhood Asthma

Recruiting at 12 trial locations

Overseen By Michaela Brtnikova, PhD

Age: < 18

Sex: Any

Trial Phase: Academic

Sponsor: University of Colorado, Denver

Disqualifiers: No asthma, Controlled asthma

No Placebo Group All trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)

Compensation: Varies

Number of Visits: Unknown

500 Participants Needed

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial aims to test a school-based program designed to help children with asthma in low-income areas manage their symptoms more effectively. It will compare two approaches: a standard program (BACK-S) and an enhanced version (BACK-E) that involves greater community participation. The goal is to reduce asthma attacks and missed school days by coordinating care among schools, families, and healthcare providers. Children aged 5-12 with poorly controlled asthma, attending participating schools in rural Colorado, may be suitable candidates for this study. As an unphased trial, this study provides a unique opportunity for children to benefit from innovative asthma management strategies tailored to their community.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether participants must stop taking their current medications.

What prior data suggests that this school-based asthma program is safe for children?

Research has shown that the BACK-S and BACK-E programs effectively reduce asthma attacks in children. In studies, children who participated in these programs reported fewer symptoms and required less emergency care for asthma attacks.

The BACK-S program tailors asthma care to each school's environment. The BACK-E program builds on this by connecting students with more community resources. Both programs have successfully reduced the frequency and severity of asthma attacks.

Previous studies indicate that these programs are well-tolerated, with no significant side effects, allowing children to safely participate. In summary, these treatments have a strong safety record and effectively manage asthma symptoms in children. ^{1 2 3 4 5}

Why are researchers excited about this trial?

Researchers are excited about the BACK-S and BACK-E programs because they take a holistic approach to managing childhood asthma, focusing not just on medical treatment but also on improving the overall environment for the child. Unlike standard treatments, which primarily involve medication like inhalers and corticosteroids, BACK-S offers a tailored strategy involving school nurses, healthcare teams, and community resources to more effectively support children with asthma. BACK-E takes it a step further by addressing social determinants of health, aiming to build strong support networks among students, families, schools, and community agencies. This comprehensive approach could lead to better asthma control and improved quality of life for children.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for childhood asthma?

Research has shown that a school-based asthma program successfully reduced asthma attacks in children facing health challenges in the Denver area. Studies have found that these programs improve asthma management by addressing health inequalities. In this trial, participants may receive either the BACK-Standard (BACK-S) or the BACK-Enhanced (BACK-E) approach. The BACK-Enhanced approach adds community resources to the usual program, aiming to reach more children and families. This enhanced strategy focuses on social factors affecting health, seeking better results than the standard program alone. Both methods aim to reduce missed school days and improve asthma management for children in low-income communities. ^{1 3 4 6 7}

Who Is on the Research Team?

Stanley Szefler

Principal Investigator

Childrens Hospital Colorado

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for children aged 5-12 with poorly controlled asthma, attending selected schools in rural Colorado that have high needs based on lunch subsidies or rural status. It's not for kids under 5 or over 12, or those whose asthma is already well-managed.

Inclusion Criteria

My asthma is not well-controlled according to my school's health form.

I am between 5 and 12 years old.

You go to a school in rural Colorado with high rates of students who need help with meals or because it's in a rural area.

Exclusion Criteria

I am either younger than 5 years old or older than 12 years old.

I am a student with no asthma or my asthma is under control.

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Preparation

Preparation phase involving tailoring implementation plans to meet local community needs, resources, and priorities

6 months

Implementation

Implementation of BACK-S and BACK-E strategies in schools to improve asthma management

36 months

Regular visits by school nurses and asthma navigators

Sustainment

Data collection for sustainment outcomes and refinement of dissemination playbook

12 months

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after implementation

12 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

• BACK-E
• BACK-S

Trial Overview

The trial tests two school-based strategies to manage childhood asthma: BACK-Standard (BACK-S) and an enhanced version (BACK-E). Both are delivered by school staff coordinated with healthcare providers to reduce asthma attacks and missed school days.

How Is the Trial Designed?

Group I: BACK-S Experimental Treatment 1 Intervention

The BACK -Standard package includes a tailor-and-adapt to context strategy of approaches necessary to implement BACK in schools based on our past work, operationalized as an implementation blueprint to coordinate with partner roles of child/family, schools, healthcare teams and community resource agencies. This includes a facilitation strategy to support problem-solving through regular learning collaborative meetings for asthma navigators (bi-weekly), school nurses (monthly to bi-monthly) and health care champions (quarterly).

Group II: BACK-E Experimental Treatment 1 Intervention

The BACK-Enhanced package includes the BACK-Standard package plus an Enhanced strategy to develop interrelationships with students/family, schools, and community agencies providing resources to address social determinants of health.

Group III: Usual care Active Control 1 Intervention

School nurses/schools randomized to usual care will continue to receive their usual care from school nurses and then subsequently provide the intervention given their asthma remains poorly controlled at the start of the next school year following enrollment.

BACK-E is already approved in United States for the following indications:

Approved in United States as BACK-E for:

• Asthma management in school settings

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

University of Colorado, Denver

Lead Sponsor

Trials

1,842

Recruited

3,028,000+

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Collaborator

Trials

3,987

Recruited

47,860,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

Children with asthma often miss more school than their healthy peers due to uncontrolled symptoms, highlighting the need for effective management strategies.

The School-based Asthma Management Program, which includes four key components, has been shown to improve communication and coordination of care among families, clinicians, and schools, ultimately helping to manage asthma more effectively.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Asthma in Schools: How School-Based Partnerships Improve Pediatric Asthma Care. Kakumanu, S., Lemanske, RF.[2019]

The school asthma program led to an impressive 80% reduction in the need for rescue treatments for asthma in the first year of implementation, indicating its effectiveness in managing asthma exacerbations among students.

In a broader expansion to five additional schools, there was a 17% overall decrease in rescue treatments, and 65% of physicians provided necessary Asthma Care Plans, demonstrating the program's feasibility and positive impact on asthma management in schools.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A school-based asthma intervention program in the Buffalo, New York, schools. Lwebuga-Mukasa, J., Dunn-Georgiou, E.[2019]

The School-Based Asthma Therapy (SBAT) program significantly increased the number of symptom-free days (SFDs) for urban children with asthma, providing about 158 additional SFDs per 100 children each month.

Despite the program costing an extra $4822 per 100 children monthly, it resulted in net savings of $3240 due to reduced medical costs and improved school attendance, making it cost-effective at $10 per additional SFD gained.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Cost-effectiveness of the School-Based Asthma Therapy (SBAT) program. Noyes, K., Bajorska, A., Fisher, S., et al.[2021]

Recent advancements in school-based asthma management, including clinical trials and school-nurse led interventions, show promise in providing effective asthma care and reducing health inequities among children.

Innovative strategies like stock albuterol policies and school-based telemedicine have the potential to enhance access to guideline-based asthma care, improving health outcomes for children with asthma.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Updates in school-based asthma management. Lowe, AA., Onge, IS., Trivedi, M.[2023]

A school-based asthma program involving 130 schools and 1316 children significantly reduced school absenteeism (50% vs 60%) and urgent care visits for asthma (41% vs 51%) after one year, indicating improved management of asthma among students.

The program also enhanced the quality of life for children with asthma and fostered a more supportive school environment, demonstrating that such interventions can effectively empower children to manage their condition better.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A randomized controlled trial of a public health nurse-delivered asthma program to elementary schools. Cicutto, L., To, T., Murphy, S.[2018]

The 'Partners in School Asthma Management' program successfully improved asthma knowledge, self-efficacy, and self-management behaviors among 835 inner-city elementary school children, but did not significantly impact their overall health status or school attendance.

An enhanced intervention that included direct meetings with a project physician and personalized asthma action plans led to better school performance and fewer absences, highlighting the importance of tailored medical support in asthma management.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Partners in school asthma management: evaluation of a self-management program for children with asthma. Bartholomew, LK., Sockrider, M., Abramson, SL., et al.[2022]

Providing low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to asthmatic children at school led to better asthma control compared to home-based delivery, with significant improvements in peak flow and reduced need for bronchodilators over a 14-week study involving 50 students.

Both school-based and home-based ICS delivery resulted in better asthma management than the control group, which received no additional treatment, highlighting the effectiveness of structured medication delivery in improving health outcomes for children with asthma.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A randomized controlled trial using the school for anti-inflammatory therapy in asthma. Millard, MW., Johnson, PT., McEwen, M., et al.[2022]

The Building Bridges for Asthma Care Program, implemented in 28 schools across Colorado and Connecticut, successfully coordinated asthma management by engaging families, health providers, and schools, leading to significant improvements in asthma care plans and inhaler techniques.

Key outcomes included increased completion of School Asthma Care Plans and Home Asthma Action Plans, as well as better access to quick-relief inhalers at school, demonstrating the program's effectiveness in supporting at-risk children with asthma.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Building Bridges for Asthma Care Program: A School-Centered Program Connecting Schools, Families, and Community Health-Care Providers. Cicutto, L., Gleason, M., Haas-Howard, C., et al.[2023]

In a study of 1,029 school children with asthma, 63% were found to have comorbid allergic rhinitis (AR), which significantly worsened their asthma symptoms and overall health outcomes.

Children with AR experienced fewer symptom-free days, increased daytime symptoms, higher use of rescue medications, and more activity limitations due to asthma, highlighting the need for better recognition and treatment of AR to reduce asthma morbidity.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Allergic rhinitis co-morbidity on asthma outcomes in city school children. Stern, J., Chen, M., Fagnano, M., et al.[2023]

School-based asthma management is seen as a key facilitator for improving asthma care, especially when supported by a full-time school nurse, as it helps reduce emergency room visits and lost learning time for children.

Barriers to effective asthma management include the need for better systemic support, improved communication among care community members, and a shift from crisis-mode responses to proactive care strategies.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A multilevel perspective on goals, barriers, and facilitators of school-based asthma management. Mammen, JR., McGovern, CM., Schoonmaker, JD., et al.[2023]

In a 16-week crossover trial involving children aged 6 to 17 with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma, fluticasone propionate (an inhaled corticosteroid) showed significantly better improvements in asthma control, pulmonary function, and inflammatory markers compared to montelukast (a leukotriene receptor antagonist).

Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) levels were identified as a useful predictor of asthma control days, helping to determine which children might benefit more from using an inhaled corticosteroid over a leukotriene receptor antagonist.

NCBI (Pubmed)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Response profiles to fluticasone and montelukast in mild-to-moderate persistent childhood asthma. Zeiger, RS., Szefler, SJ., Phillips, BR., et al.[2023]

Citations

1.

nature.com

nature.com/articles/s41533-024-00406-6

Improving asthma care in children: revealing needs and ...

Asthma affects 7% of Dutch children and poses an increasing challenge, highlighting the need for effective paediatric asthma care.

2.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39148094/

Reducing asthma attacks in disadvantaged school children ...

Our school-based asthma intervention has reduced asthma exacerbations for children experiencing health disparities in the Denver Metropolitan Area.

3.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11325631/

Reducing asthma attacks in disadvantaged school children ...

Our central hypothesis is that our BACK-E implementation strategy will have significantly greater reach to eligible children/families than BACK-S (primary ...

4.

researchgate.net

researchgate.net/publication/383147565_Reducing_asthma_attacks_in_disadvantaged_school_children_with_asthma_study_protocol_for_a_type_2_hybrid_implementation-effectiveness_trial_Better_Asthma_Control_for_Kids_BACK

Reducing asthma attacks in disadvantaged school children ...

Our central hypothesis is that our BACK-E implementation strategy will have significantly greater reach to eligible children/families than BACK-S (primary ...

5.

sciencedirect.com

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0882596324001064

Children and young people's self-reported experiences of ...

Childhood asthma is an increasingly significant health issue, highlighting the importance of acquiring self-management skills to optimise future health outcomes ...

6.

coloradokidswithasthma.org

coloradokidswithasthma.org/about-us/

Learn about BACK | Better Asthma Control for Kids

What is now called the “BACK,” Better Asthma Control for Kids, program began in 2006 as a community-engaged partnership between pediatric asthma experts at the ...

7.

thorax.bmj.com

thorax.bmj.com/content/76/5/434

An enhanced care package to improve asthma ... - Thorax

Children receiving a pragmatic enhanced asthma care package reported significantly fewer symptoms and decreased exacerbations resulting in emergency health care ...