130 Participants Needed

Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spinal Cancer

ST
EB
Overseen ByEhsan Balagamwala, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 2
Sponsor: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests a special type of radiation treatment called spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for individuals with spinal cancer. The researchers aim to determine if administering the treatment in one or two sessions can reduce pain and other symptoms while minimizing the risk of vertebral compression fractures, which are small bone breaks that often aren't painful. Individuals with cancer that has spread to specific areas of the spine, who have mild to moderate neurological issues and can handle the procedures, might be suitable candidates for this trial. As a Phase 2 trial, it measures the treatment's effectiveness in an initial, smaller group, offering participants a chance to contribute to important research.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the trial coordinators or your doctor.

Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?

Research shows that spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is generally safe and effective for treating spine cancer. Studies have found that it provides lasting pain relief and helps control the disease. In one study, 61% of patients survived after one year, and only 9% experienced vertebral compression fractures, which can occur after treatment.

Both the single fraction (a one-time high-dose treatment) and two fraction (split into two high-dose treatments) methods are usually well-tolerated by patients. A long-term study showed that the chances of cancer returning in the treated area were low, indicating good safety and effectiveness.

In summary, evidence suggests that spine SRS, whether done in one or two sessions, is generally safe for treating spine cancer. However, like any medical treatment, there are risks, such as the possibility of spine fractures, but these are not common.12345

Why are researchers excited about this trial's treatments?

Researchers are excited about Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for spinal cancer because it offers a precise, high-dose radiation treatment in fewer sessions compared to conventional therapies. Traditional radiation treatment often requires multiple sessions over several weeks, while Spine SRS can deliver similar or greater doses in just one or two fractions. This approach not only potentially reduces treatment time and inconvenience for patients but also aims to target tumors more accurately, sparing healthy surrounding tissue and minimizing side effects.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for spinal cancer?

Studies have shown that Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) effectively treats spinal cancer. Research indicates that SRS delivers strong radiation doses directly to the cancer while protecting nearby healthy tissues. This precise targeting reduces pain and nerve problems caused by spinal tumors. Evidence supports that SRS is both safe and cost-effective for treating spine metastases, which are cancerous growths that have spread to the spine. In this trial, participants will receive either a single treatment session (Arm 1) or two treatment sessions (Arm 2). Initial findings suggest that both approaches help manage symptoms and may lower the risk of spine fractures, though ongoing research is comparing these approaches.12367

Who Is on the Research Team?

Samuel Chao, MD | Cleveland Clinic

Samuel T. Chao, MD

Principal Investigator

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for individuals with cancer that has spread to their spine, affecting up to three separate sites without causing spinal cord compression. Participants must be in good physical condition (KPS ≥ 70), able to undergo MRI scans, and not pregnant. Those who've had prior radiation at the index site may join, but not if they've had specific spine treatments or have certain types of cancer like lymphoma.

Inclusion Criteria

Negative pregnancy test within four weeks of registration for women of childbearing potential.
My overall health status fits within a specific range and my cancer is either controlled or not, depending on other health factors.
History and physical within four weeks of registration.
See 11 more

Exclusion Criteria

You have an ongoing connective tissue disease that is currently active.
My cancer has spread to more than 5 levels of my spine.
I have a spinal cord compression that needs urgent care.
See 16 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2-4 weeks

Treatment

Participants undergo spine stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) in either one or two sessions depending on the assigned group

1-2 weeks
1-2 visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for vertebral compression fractures, quality of life, local control, pain control, and toxicity

12 months
Follow-up MRIs at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Spine SRS in 1 fraction
  • Spine SRS in 2 fraction
Trial Overview The study compares single-session versus two-session Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery (sSRS) for treating vertebral metastases. It aims to determine which method better prevents vertebral compression fractures after delivering high-dose x-ray treatments focused on the affected areas of the spine.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Group I: Arm 1 - Single fractionExperimental Treatment6 Interventions
Group II: Arm 2 - Two fractionActive Control6 Interventions

Spine SRS in 1 fraction is already approved in United States, European Union, Canada, Japan for the following indications:

🇺🇸
Approved in United States as Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery for:
🇪🇺
Approved in European Union as Spine Radiosurgery for:
🇨🇦
Approved in Canada as Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for:
🇯🇵
Approved in Japan as Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery for:

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Lead Sponsor

Trials
472
Recruited
33,400+

Published Research Related to This Trial

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment for spinal metastases, allowing for the delivery of high doses of radiation to improve tumor control and provide relief from symptoms.
SBRT is particularly beneficial for patients with complex cases, such as those who have previously received radiation at the same site or have tumors that are resistant to conventional treatments, and can be used alongside other therapies like spinal decompression.
Stereotactic radiotherapy: an emerging treatment for spinal metastases.Dahele, M., Fehlings, MG., Sahgal, A.[2019]
A comprehensive risk analysis of the paraspinal SBRT workflow identified 74 potential failure modes across various phases, with treatment planning being a significant source of safety concerns.
The highest risks were linked to inadequate evaluation of previous radiotherapy, incorrect imaging registration, and undetected patient movement, prompting the implementation of targeted remedies like staff education and improved imaging protocols to enhance treatment safety.
Failure mode and effect analysis for linear accelerator-based paraspinal stereotactic body radiotherapy.Lee, S., Lovelock, DM., Kowalski, A., et al.[2021]
Patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for metastatic spine tumors experienced a significantly higher rate of vertebral body fractures (22.22%) compared to those receiving conventionally fractionated external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (6.67%), indicating a safety concern with SBRT.
Despite the increased fracture risk, SBRT demonstrated a higher initial local control rate (86.67%) compared to EBRT (77.78%), although this difference in local control was not significant after adjusting for survival analysis, likely due to the presence of more radiosensitive tumors in the EBRT group.
Vertebral body fracture rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy compared with external-beam radiation therapy for metastatic spine tumors.Vargas, E., Susko, MS., Mummaneni, PV., et al.[2023]

Citations

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Indications ...Spine SBRT is a highly effective treatment that is capable of delivering ablative doses to the target while sparing the critical organs-at-risk.
Efficacy and safety of SBRT for spine metastasesIn this study, we summarize the available evidence for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of spinal metastases. Materials ...
Long-Term Outcomes After Reirradiation With Spine ...Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases is a safe, effective, and cost-effective treatment. As cancer incidence and ...
Repeat Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal...This study supplements previous studies and is one of the largest to report outcomes for a salvage repeat course of spine SBRT after same ...
Stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastasesIn this review, we highlight the indications and controversies of SBRT along with new surgical techniques for the treatment of spinal metastases.
Oncologic and Functional Outcomes After Stereotactic ...One hundred forty-three patients were included. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 5.1%, 7.5%, and 14.1% at 6, 12, and 24 months, ...
Five-Year Outcomes of High-Dose Single-Fraction Spinal ...This is the first study reporting the long-term tumor control and toxicity profiles after high-dose single-fraction spinal SRS.
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security