FEIBA vs FFP for Bleeding
What You Need to Know Before You Apply
What is the purpose of this trial?
This trial tests two treatments, FEIBA and FFP, to determine which better stops bleeding in patients after heart surgery. It focuses on patients who bleed due to blood clotting issues after using a heart-lung machine during surgery. Participants should be undergoing planned heart surgery, excluding coronary artery procedures, and require treatment with clotting factors for their bleeding. The goal is to determine if FEIBA can more effectively control this type of bleeding compared to the current standard treatment, FFP (fresh frozen plasma). As a Phase 2 trial, this research measures the treatment's effectiveness in an initial, smaller group of people.
Will I have to stop taking my current medications?
The trial information does not specify whether you need to stop taking your current medications. It's best to discuss this with the study team or your doctor.
Is there any evidence suggesting that this trial's treatments are likely to be safe?
Why do researchers think this study treatment might be promising?
FEIBA is unique because it is designed to manage bleeding by enhancing the clotting process in patients with hemophilia who have inhibitors. Unlike standard treatments like Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP), which rely on providing the body with general clotting factors, FEIBA specifically targets and bypasses the inhibitors that often complicate hemophilia treatment. Researchers are excited because this targeted approach can potentially offer faster and more effective bleeding control, reducing the risk of complications associated with hemophilia.
What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for coagulopathic-induced bleeding?
Research has shown that FEIBA, one of the treatments studied in this trial, effectively treats bleeding problems. In one study, it successfully stopped bleeding in 92% of cases with sudden bleeding. Another study found that FEIBA reduced the number of bleeding episodes in patients. These results suggest that FEIBA could be a good option for managing bleeding after heart surgery. The evidence supports its potential effectiveness in these situations. Participants in this trial will receive either FEIBA or FFP, with FFP serving as the active comparator.13567
Who Is on the Research Team?
Pey-Jen Yu
Principal Investigator
Northwell Health
Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?
This trial is for cardiac surgery patients who experience coagulopathic-induced bleeding after the procedure. It's not clear what specific inclusion or exclusion criteria are set, so interested individuals should inquire about detailed eligibility requirements.Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Timeline for a Trial Participant
Screening
Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial
Treatment
Participants receive either FEIBA or FFP as first line therapy for coagulopathic-induced bleeding after cardiac surgery
Follow-up
Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including incidence of adverse postoperative events
What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?
Interventions
- FEIBA
- FFP
Trial Overview
The study aims to compare FEIBA (Factor VIII Inhibitor Bypass Activity) with FFP (Fresh Frozen Plasma) to see which is more effective as a first-line treatment for bleeding in patients following cardiac surgery.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2
Treatment groups
Experimental Treatment
Active Control
Find a Clinic Near You
Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?
Northwell Health
Lead Sponsor
Citations
Efficacy Data - FEIBA [Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex ...
In a clinical trial, FEIBA prophylaxis delivered a reduction in median Annual Bleed Rate (ABR) compared with on-demand treatment · No Bleeding Events in 18%.
Efficacy of FEIBA for acute bleeding and surgical ...
FEIBA was judged effective in 92% of treatment courses for acute bleeding, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 85-97%. Rates of haemostatic efficacy did not ...
“FEIBA Global Outcome Study (FEIBA GO)” Data Read-out: ...
Conclusions: These preliminary findings demonstrate prevention of joint bleeding with FEIBA prophylaxis comparable to that reported in patients ...
4.
ashpublications.org
ashpublications.org/blood/article/109/2/546/23485/A-randomized-comparison-of-bypassing-agents-inthe FEIBA NovoSeven Comparative (FENOC) Study | Blood
Both products were associated with an efficacy rate of from 80% to 90% at some time points, consistent with previous reports.11-13,17 Another ...
Anti-Inhibitor Coagulant Complex Prophylaxis in ...
Panel B shows the data on bleeding for the 10 patients in whom bleeding episodes were reduced by less than 50% during prophylaxis. A mean of ...
A retrospective postlicensure survey of FEIBA efficacy and ...
Based on available data, FEIBA was judged safe in all treatment situations by the small number of adverse events (<0.04%). No thrombotic complications occurred ...
Safety and Effectiveness of Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing ...
This case series suggests that FEIBA administration is relatively safe and effective to reverse DOACs in the setting of hemorrhage or need for urgent surgical ...
Unbiased Results
We believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your Data
We only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials Only
All of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.