Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation Post-Ablation

(OCEAN Trial)

No longer recruiting at 60 trial locations
SJ
David H Birnie, MD profile photo
Overseen ByDavid H Birnie, MD
Age: 18+
Sex: Any
Trial Phase: Phase 4
Sponsor: Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Must be taking: Blood thinners
No Placebo GroupAll trial participants will receive the active study treatment (no placebo)
Prior Safety DataThis treatment has passed at least one previous human trial

What You Need to Know Before You Apply

What is the purpose of this trial?

This trial tests two treatments to prevent strokes in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have undergone a successful ablation procedure to correct their irregular heartbeat. The study compares a daily aspirin with a daily dose of the blood thinner Rivaroxaban (also known as Xarelto) to determine which is more effective. It is ideal for those who have been free of AF symptoms for over a year after ablation and have a stroke risk score related to their AF. As a Phase 4 trial, this research aims to understand how these FDA-approved treatments benefit more patients, offering an opportunity to contribute to valuable insights.

Will I have to stop taking my current medications?

The trial does not specify if you need to stop taking your current medications, but you cannot participate if you've been on certain strong medications like CYP3A inducers or inhibitors within a few days of joining. It's best to discuss your current medications with the trial team.

What is the safety track record for these treatments?

Research has shown that aspirin, also known as acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), can be a safe option for many patients after a successful procedure to treat atrial fibrillation (AF). One study found that switching from warfarin to aspirin three months post-procedure can be as safe and effective as continuing long-term blood thinners for some patients.

Regarding rivaroxaban, studies indicate it is generally well-tolerated. The risk of stroke, blood vessel blockage, or death was similar for patients taking rivaroxaban compared to those on warfarin. Additionally, using rivaroxaban continuously around the time of the procedure appears to be as safe as other blood thinners.

Both aspirin and rivaroxaban have been studied and are considered safe options for patients after the procedure, with no major differences in serious side effects.12345

Why are researchers enthusiastic about this study treatment?

Researchers are excited about these treatments because they offer unique approaches to anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation post-ablation. Unlike traditional anticoagulants like warfarin, which require regular blood monitoring and dietary restrictions, Rivaroxaban is a direct oral anticoagulant that provides a more convenient, once-daily dosing without the need for ongoing monitoring. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), commonly known as aspirin, is notable for its established safety profile and accessibility, offering an alternative for those who may be intolerant to other anticoagulant therapies. These options may provide patients with more flexibility and improve quality of life without compromising efficacy.

What evidence suggests that this trial's treatments could be effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients post-ablation?

In this trial, participants will receive either acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or rivaroxaban to manage stroke risk after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Research has shown that aspirin, also known as ASA, can be helpful after AF ablation, with studies suggesting it can be as safe and effective as long-term blood thinners like warfarin for preventing strokes in some patients. Rivaroxaban is another option studied in this trial. Some studies found it effective in lowering the risk of stroke without increasing the chance of bleeding after AF ablation. Both aspirin and rivaroxaban have shown promise in managing stroke risk after successful AF ablation, but the best choice may depend on individual health needs and a doctor's advice.13567

Who Is on the Research Team?

Atul Verma, MD — AFS 2025

Atul Verma, MD

Principal Investigator

Southlake Regional Health Centre

DH

David H Birnie, MD

Principal Investigator

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Are You a Good Fit for This Trial?

This trial is for adults over 18 who've had successful catheter ablation for non-valvular atrial fibrillation at least a year ago, with no arrhythmia since then and have a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1+. It's not for those with severe kidney issues, recent strokes, conditions needing long-term blood thinners other than AF, or women at risk of pregnancy not using contraception.

Inclusion Criteria

I had a successful heart rhythm correction procedure over a year ago with no arrhythmia since.
You have a certain score that shows your risk for stroke.
I am older than 18 years.
See 1 more

Exclusion Criteria

You are very sick or are not expected to live for more than 3 years.
I cannot take blood thinners or antiplatelet medications due to other health issues.
I cannot have a loop recorder implanted due to health reasons.
See 16 more

Timeline for a Trial Participant

Screening

Participants are screened for eligibility to participate in the trial

2 months
1 visit (in-person)

Treatment

Participants are randomized to receive either ASA 75-160 mg daily or rivaroxaban 15 mg daily for stroke prevention post-ablation

3 years
Annual visits (in-person)

Follow-up

Participants are monitored for safety and effectiveness after treatment, including annual blood tests, ECG, Holter monitoring, and quality of life assessments

3 years
Annual visits (in-person)

MRI Assessment

Cerebral MRI scanning at baseline and at three years to assess for silent cerebral infarction

3 years
2 visits (in-person)

What Are the Treatments Tested in This Trial?

Interventions

  • Acetylsalicylic acid
  • Rivaroxaban
Trial Overview The study compares two stroke prevention strategies in post-ablation AF patients: taking the oral anticoagulant Rivaroxaban versus daily Aspirin. The goal is to determine which approach is more effective after the elimination of arrhythmia through ablation.
How Is the Trial Designed?
2Treatment groups
Active Control
Group I: Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)Active Control1 Intervention
Group II: RivaroxabanActive Control1 Intervention

Find a Clinic Near You

Who Is Running the Clinical Trial?

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Lead Sponsor

Trials
200
Recruited
95,800+

Abbott

Industry Sponsor

Trials
760
Recruited
489,000+
Dr. Etahn Korngold profile image

Dr. Etahn Korngold

Abbott

Chief Medical Officer

MD, Harvard Medical School

Robert B. Ford profile image

Robert B. Ford

Abbott

Chief Executive Officer since 2020

Bachelor's degree from Boston College, MBA from UC Berkeley, Haas School of Business

Bayer

Industry Sponsor

Trials
2,291
Recruited
25,560,000+
Founded
1863
Headquarters
Leverkusen, Germany
Known For
Pharmaceutical Innovations
Top Products
Aspirin, Aleve, Yaz, Nexavar

Bill Anderson

Bayer

Chief Executive Officer since 2023

BSc in Chemical Engineering from the University of Texas, MSc in Chemical Engineering and Management from MIT

Michael Devoy profile image

Michael Devoy

Bayer

Chief Medical Officer since 2014

MD, PhD

Biotronik Canada Inc

Industry Sponsor

Trials
5
Recruited
1,900+

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

Collaborator

Trials
1,417
Recruited
26,550,000+

Published Research Related to This Trial

Rivaroxaban combined with aspirin is more effective in preventing recurrent cardiovascular events than aspirin alone, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €16,522 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, based on a lifetime analysis of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD).
The cost-effectiveness of the combination therapy was consistent across subgroups, showing ICERs of €8003 for PAD and €18,599 for CAD, indicating that this treatment strategy is economically viable for improving cardiovascular outcomes in these patient populations.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy.Ferrara, P., Cortesi, PA., Di Laura, D., et al.[2022]

Citations

Ablation to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation Burden and Improve ...Treatment with CA was associated with a decrease in all-cause mortality (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.86, p = 0.01) and risk of hospitalization for ...
Safety and Efficacy of Switching Anticoagulation to Aspirin ...Switching warfarin to aspirin 3 months after successful RFCA of AF could be as safe and efficacious as long-term anticoagulation even in patients with CHA 2 DS ...
Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation compared with ...In this cohort study, patients who received CA demonstrated a reduction in the risk of long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared with ...
Does Catheter Ablation Eliminate the Need for Oral ...Although these retrospective studies suggest that the risk-benefit ratio favored the suspension of OAC after successful AF ablation over medium- ...
Safety/Efficacy of DOAC Versus Aspirin for Reduction ...DOAC use following endocardial and/or epicardial ablation for LVA-RFA was associated with reduced risk of TIA or stroke and asymptomatic MRI-detected ...
Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation compared with ...In this cohort study, patients who received CA demonstrated a reduction in the risk of long-term adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared with medical therapy ...
Ablation of atrial fibrillation and risk of stroke: A meta-analysisOverall, our results indicate a significant reduction (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45–0.87; P = .006) of stroke risk in eligible patients with AF ...
Unbiased ResultsWe believe in providing patients with all the options.
Your Data Stays Your DataWe only share your information with the clinical trials you're trying to access.
Verified Trials OnlyAll of our trials are run by licensed doctors, researchers, and healthcare companies.
Terms of Service·Privacy Policy·Cookies·Security