Your session is about to expire
← Back to Search
Omadacycline for Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease
Study Summary
This trial will test if omadacycline is better than placebo at treating NTM pulmonary disease caused by MABc.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
You may be eligible if you check “Yes” for the criteria belowTimeline
Treatment Details
Study Objectives
Outcome measures can provide a clearer picture of what you can expect from a treatment.Trial Design
Find a Location
Who is running the clinical trial?
Media Library
- I haven't taken steroids for a chronic condition in the last 3 months.I have been treated with omadacycline before.I have at least two symptoms like coughing, chest pain, or weight loss due to NTM infection.I have not had cancer treatments in the last year.My doctor thinks I won't need antibiotics for my condition in the next 3 months.I have been diagnosed with a lung infection caused by MABc.I have taken antibiotics in the last 6 months for MABc or MAC.I have active tuberculosis in my lungs.My lung function is severely reduced.I have cystic fibrosis.I have at least 2 symptoms like coughing, chest pain, or weight loss.My recent CT scan shows signs of a MABc infection in my chest.I can cough up sputum on my own or with help.I have not taken antibiotics, except for chronic macrolides, in the last 4 weeks.My NTM infection has spread beyond my lungs.You have had a lung transplant in the past.
- Group 1: Omadacycline 300 mg PO
- Group 2: Placebo PO
- Screening: It may take up to 8 Weeks to process to see if you qualify in this trial.
- Treatment: You will receive the treatment for 84 null
- Follow Ups: You may be asked to continue sharing information regarding the trial for 30 Months after you stop receiving the treatment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are there any slots remaining in this clinical experiment for prospective participants?
"According to the clinicaltrials.gov database, this trial is in its recruitment phase; it was launched on October 15th 2021 and updated most recently on November 17th 2022."
What potential risks can be associated with Omadacycline Oral Tablet utilization?
"While there is some evidence of safety with Omadacycline Oral Tablet, the lack of clinical data supporting efficacy resulted in a score of 2."
Is this medical experiment being conducted in multiple locations within the city?
"This clinical trial is currently running at 30 different sites, including Tyler, Saint Louis and Liverpool. To reduce the burden of travel for potential participants, it is best to join a study in a location nearby."
What is the current enrollment size for this clinical experiment?
"To fulfil the requirements of this clinical trial, 75 patients must meet the inclusion criteria and be located at any one of several medical centres. The sponsor for this project is Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc., who will oversee operations from sites such as Tyler, Texas' Medical Facility and Saint Louis Missouri's University of Texas Health Science Center locations."
What diseases does Omadacycline Oral Tablet address?
"Omadacycline Oral Tablet is mainly used to address staphylococcus lugdunensis, however it has been known to be an effective intervention for conditions such as enterobacter cloacae, enterococcus faecalis and klebsiella pneumoniae."
Are there any analogous experiments using Omadacycline Oral Tablet?
"Currently, there are 2 active clinical trials exploring the effects of Omadacycline Oral Tablet with 0 Phase 3 studies. Most research sites for this drug are centered in Atlanta, Georgia; however, 31 other locations also have running trials concerning Omadacycline Oral Tablet."
Is this the pioneering research of its kind?
"Currently, two trials are taking place involving Omadacycline Oral Tablet in 20 cities across a single nation. The initial study for the drug was conducted by Paratek Pharmaceuticals Inc in 2021 and enrolled twelve participants, concluding its Phase 4 approval stage. Since then, 18334 additional tests have been successfully completed."
Who else is applying?
What state do they live in?
What site did they apply to?
What portion of applicants met pre-screening criteria?
How many prior treatments have patients received?
Why did patients apply to this trial?
How responsive is this trial?
Most responsive sites:
- Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC): < 24 hours
- Einstein/Montefiore Medical Center: < 48 hours
- Northwell Health: < 48 hours
Average response time
- < 2 Days
Typically responds via
Share this study with friends
Copy Link
Messenger